Team Displays Work,Particularly with Communication Breakdown: Performance and Situation Awareness in a Simulated Forest Fire

Abstract

A team display provides integrated information required by teams performing command and control tasks in complex situations. This study assessed the impact of such an information display using the C³Fire micro-world simulation of command and control tasks when managing forest fire incidents. The study focused on the impact of the team display when teamwork was interrupted by communication breakdown. The findings show that performance was significantly better with the team display, in terms of a lower mean number of lost houses, particularly when there was a communication breakdown. In addition, the presence of the team display was associated with better situation awareness. In practical terms, the study shows that a team display facilitates performance and situation awareness. In theoretical terms, there may be other cognitive processes and contributing factors to the benefit of the team display in addition to facilitating situation awareness.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arora

Johnson

(2006). A Model for Building a Standardized Hand-off Protocol. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 32(11), 646-655.

Bartels

Herskovic

Monares

Ochoa

Pino

Borges

(2010). A Simple and Portable Command Post to Coordinate Search and Rescue Activities in Disaster Relief Efforts. In Kolfschoten

Herrmann

Lukosch

(Eds.), Collaboration and Technology (Vol. 6257, pp. 337-344): Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.

Bigley

Roberts

(2001). The incident command system: high reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1281-1299.

Bolstad

C. A.

Endsley

M. R.

(2000). The Effect of Task Load and Shared Displays on Team Situation Awareness. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, 44, 189-192.

Brehmer

Dörner

(1993). Experiments With Computer-Simulated Microworlds: Escaping Both the Narrow Straits of the Laboratory and the Deep Blue Sea of the Field Study. Computers in Human Behaviour, Vol. 9. pp.171-184 1993.

Dominguez

Long

W. G.

Miller

T. E.

Wiggins

S. L.

(2006). Design directions for support of submarine commanding officer decision making. Paper presented at the 2006 Undersea HSI Symposium: Research, Acquisition and the Warrior, Mystic, CT, USA.

Douglas

Aleva

Havig

(2007). Shared Displays: An Overview of Perceptual and Cognitive Issues. Paper presented at the 12th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium: Adapting C2 to the 21st Century.

Dudfield

H. J.

Macklin

Fearnley

Simpson

Hall

(2001). Big is better? Human factors issues of large screen displays with military command teams. Paper presented at the Human Interfaces in Control Rooms, Cockpits and Command Centres, 2001. People in Control. The Second International Conference on (IEE Conf. Publ. No. 481).

Emery

Catchpole

Macklin

Dudfield

Myers

(2001, 2001). Big is better? Empirical results of an assessment of command teams with large screen displays. Paper presented at the Human Interfaces in Control Rooms, Cockpits and Command Centres, 2001. People in Control. The Second International Conference on (IEE Conf. Publ. No. 481).

10.

Goin

Vernik

Wark

(2010). Using Large Group Displays to Support Intensive Team Activities in C2. Paper presented at the 16th Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium International: Collective C2 in Multinational Civil-Military Operation, Quebec City, Canada.

11.

Gorman

J. C.

Cooke

N. J.

Winner

J. L.

(2006). Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments. Ergonomics, 49(12), 1312-1325.

12.

Gosbee

. (2010). Handoffs and Communication: The Underappreciated Roles of Situational Awareness and Inattentional Blindness. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 53(3), 545-558 510.1097/GRF.1090b1013e3181ec1091ac1097.

13.

Granlund

Johansson

Persson

(2001). C³Fire a Micro-world for Collaboration Training and Investigations in the ROLF environment. Proceedings of 42nd Conference on Simulation and Modeling: Simulation in Theory and Practice.

14.

Jiang

Hong

J. I.

Takayama

L. A.

Landay

J. A.

(2004). Ubiquitous computing for firefighters: field studies and prototypes of large displays for incident command. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Vienna, Austria.

15.

Lafond

Tremblay

Dubé

Rousseau

Breton

(2010). A tool for estimating the costs/benefits of teamwork in different C2 structures. Retrieved from http://cradpdf.drdcrddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc108/p534757_A1b.pdf

16.

Landgren

. (2005). Shared use of information technology in emergency response work: Results from a field experiment. In Walle

B. V. d.

Carlé

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International ISCRAM Conference (pp. 35-41). Brussels, Belgium.

17.

McKinsey & Company. (2002). McKinsey report: Increasing FDNY’s preparedness. New York.

18.

McLennan

Holgate

A. M.

Omodei

M. M.

Wearing

A. J.

(2006). Decision Making Effectiveness in Wildfire Incident Management Teams. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 14(1), 27-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2006.00478.x

19.

Paris

C. R.

Salas

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

(2000). Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1052-1075.

20.

Parush

Kramer

Foster-Hunt

Momtahan

Hunter

Sohmer

(2011). Communication and Team Situation Awareness in the OR: Implications for augmentative information display. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44 (2011), 477-485. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2010.04.002.

21.

Putnam

. (1995). Findings from the Wildland Firefighters Human Factors Workshop: improving wildland firefighter performance under stressful, risky conditions: toward better decisions on the fireline and more resilient organizations (pp. 74).

22.

Resch

Schmidt

Blaschke

(2007). Enabling geographic situational awareness in emergency management Proceedings of the 2nd Geospatial Integration for Public Safety Conference (pp. 1-8). New Orleans, Louisiana, US.

23.

Roth

E. M.

Lin

Thomas

V. M.

Kerch

Kenney

S. J.

Sugibayashi

(1998). Supporting situation awareness of individuals and teams using group view displays. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA.

24.

Salas

Burke

C. S.

Samman

S. N.

(2001). Understanding Command and Control Teams Operating in Complex Environments. Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag., 2(4), 311-323.

25.

Salas

Cooke

N. J.

Rosen

M. A.

(2008). On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 540.

26.

Stout

R. J.

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

Salas

Milanovich

D. M.

(1999). Planning, Shared Mental Models, and Coordinated Performance: An Empirical Link Is Established. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 41(1), 61-71. doi: 10.1518/001872099779577273

27.

Tolcott

M.A.

(1992). Understanding and aiding military decisions. In S.C.Collyer, The 27th International Applied Military Psychology Symposium: A Focus On Decision Making Research, London, 92, 33-48.

28.

Varone

J. C.

Dept

P. F.

(1996). Fireground Radio Communications and Firefighter Safety: National Fire Academy.

29.

Wilson

K. A.

Salas

Priest

H. A.

Andrews

(2007). Errors in the Heat of Battle: Taking a Closer Look at Shared Cognition Breakdowns Through Teamwork. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 49(2), 243-256. doi: 10.1518/001872007x312478