Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce an Organizational Constraints Analysis (OCA) approach to work analysis that focuses on how organizational rules constrain coordination work possibilities. OCA is guided by ideas from Cognitive Work Analysis and by organizational theory. First, using nurse rostering and rail controller rostering case studies, we discuss the development of two analytical tools: the Organizational Constraints model and Work Possibilities template. Second, we conduct an initial test of the generalizability of the analytical tools in a hospital bed management domain. Overall, the findings suggest that the OCA approach has the potential to help researchers and analysts develop a richer understanding of the organizational processes that constrain the coordination of work.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ash

J. S.

Berg

Coiera

(2004). Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors. JAMIA, 11(2), 104–112.

Burke

E. K.

De Causmaecker

VandenBerghe

Van Landeghem

(2004). The state of the art of nurse rostering. J Schedul, 7(6), 441–499.

Feldman

M. S.

Pentland

B. T.

(2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. ASQ, 48(1), 94–118.

Gersick

C.J.G.

Hackman

J.R.

(1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(1), 65–97.

Ham

D. H.

Yoon

W. C.

(2001). The effects of presenting functionally abstracted information in fault diagnosis tasks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 73(2), 103–119.

Hoffman

R. R.

Crandall

Shadbolt

(1998). Use of the critical decision method to elicit expert knowledge: A case study in the methodology of cognitive task analysis. Human Factors, 40(2), 254–276.

Malone

T. W.

Crowston

(1990). What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? Paper presented at the Third Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, LA.

Meyer

J. W.

Rowan

(1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 340–363.

Mintzberg

(1983). Structure in fives: designing effective organizations. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

10.

Nyssen

A. S.

Javaux

(1996). Analysis of synchronization constraints and associated errors in collective work environments. Ergonomics, 39(10), 1249–1264.

11.

Rasmussen

Pejtersen

Goodstein

(1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

12.

Reddy

Dourish

Pratt

(2006). Temporality in medical work: Time also matters. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15, 29–53.

13.

Rerup

Feldman

(2011). Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: the role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 577–610.

14.

Symon

Long

Ellis

(1996). The coordination of work activities: Cooperation and conflict in a hospital context. CSCW, 5, 1–31.

15.

Thompson

J. D.

(1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw Hill.

16.

Zerubavel

(1979). Patterns of time in hospital life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Developing and evaluating the Organizational Constraints Analysis (OCA) approach to analysing work coordination via resource allocation case studies

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References