As air traffic control (ATC) becomes increasingly automated, software designers need to know how air traffic controllers process information as they manage operations in today’s system. Extracting knowledge from today’s controller workforce and representing that knowledge in the form of mental computations are essential steps toward needs assessment and development of advanced decision-aiding tools and technologies. A recent task analysis documented information derived by controllers from their cognitive integration of displayed information. This work envisions future, more detailed analyses of the controller’s mental computations as essential to identifying needs for advanced software tools, including predictive displays.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhlstromU.RubinsteinJ.SiegelS.MogfordR.ManningC. (2001). Display concepts for En Route air traffic control (DOT/FAA/CT-TN01/06). Atlantic City International Airport, NJ: Department of Transportation, FAA, W. J. Hughes Technical Center.
2.
AhlstromV.LargoK. (2003). Human factors design standard (DOT/FAA/CT-03/05; HF-STD-001). Atlantic City International Airport, NJ: Dept of Transportation, FAA, W. J. Hughes Technical Center.
3.
AmmermanH. L.BeckerE. S.JonesG. W.TobeyW. K.PhillipsM.D. (1987). FAA air traffic control operations concepts (Vol.1). Colorado Springs, CO: Computer Technology Associates (CTA).
4.
BainbridgeL. (1983). Increasing levels of automation can increase, rather than decrease, the problems of supporting the human operator. Automatica, 19, 775-779.
5.
ColemanB.GundersonN.MurphyE.RooneyP.ShannonR.SheppardS.StewartL.TuttleB. (1986). Automated En Route air traffic control (AERA) 2 operations concept. Englewood, CO: CTA.
6.
EndsleyM. R. (1993). Situation awareness: A Fundamental factor underlying the successful implementation of AI in the air traffic control system. In GarlandD. J.WiseJ. M. (Eds.), Human factors and advanced aviation technologies (pp. 117-122). Daytona Beach, FL: Embry Riddle.
7.
EndsleyM. R. (1994). Situation awareness in dynamic human decision making: Theory. In GilsonR. D.GarlandD. J.KoonceJ. M. (Eds.), Situational awareness in complex systems (pp. 27-58). Daytona Beach, FL: Embry Riddle.
8.
EndsleyM. R.BolteB.JonesD. G. (2003). Designing for situation awareness. New York: CRC/Taylor & Francis.
9.
EndsleyM. R.RodgersM. D. (1994). Situation awareness information requirements for en route air traffic control. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting (pp. 71-75). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
10.
EndsleyM. R.RodgersM. D. (1996). Attention distribution and situation awareness in air traffic control. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting (pp. 82-85). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
11.
EndsleyM. R.SmolenskyM. W. (1998). Situation awareness in air traffic control: The Picture. In SmolenskyM. W.SteinE. S. (Eds.), Human factors in air traffic control (pp. 115-154). New York: Academic Press.
12.
EndsleyM. R.SollenbergerR.SteinE. (1999). The Use of predictive displays for aiding controller situation awareness. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (pp.51-56). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
13.
ExumM.BolczakR.CelioJ. C.PooreD. S. (2010). Concept of operations for En Route separation management enhancements (MP090111R2)). McLean, VA: MITRE.
14.
FAA Planning Directorate. (2010). CSE NextGen midterm transition planning products (Ver. 3.4). Washington, DC: FAA, En Route and Oceanic Services, Chief System Engineer.
15.
Federal Aviation Administration. (2010). FAA’s NextGen implementation plan. Washington, DC: FAA NextGen Integration and Implementation Office.
16.
FoldsD. J. (2005). Quantification of rapid decision making. In McBrideD. K.SchmorrowD. (Eds.), Quantifying human information processing (pp. 233-243). New York: Lexington/Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
HopkinV. D. (2010). Air-traffic control automation. In WiseJ. A.HopkinV. D.GarlandD. J. (Eds.), Handbook of aviation human factors (2nd Ed., pp. 22-1–22-22). New York: CRC/Taylor & Francis.
18.
HopkinV. D. (1994). Human performance implications of air traffic control automation. In MoulouaM.ParasuramanR. (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 314-319). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
HopkinV. D. (1995). Human factors in air traffic control. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
20.
HopkinV. D. (1998). Impact of automation on air traffic control specialists. In SmolenskyM. W.SteinE. S. (Eds.), Human factors in air traffic control (pp. 391-418). New York: Academic Press.
21.
Human Technology Inc. (HTI). (1991). Cognitive task analysis of En Route air traffic control. McLean, VA: HTI.
22.
JohnsonJ. (2010). Designing with the mind in mind. New York: Morgan Kaufman/Elsevier.
23.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
24.
MogfordR. (1994). Mental models in air traffic control. In GilsonR. D.GarlandD. J.KoonceJ. M. (Eds.), Situational awareness in complex systems (pp. 199-207). Daytona Beach, FL: Embry Riddle.
25.
MurphyE. D.AlbertH. A.ChenJ. M.AndersonG. G.SchultheisU. W. (2011). En Route air traffic control mid-term job task analysis (Report prepared for the Federal Aviation Administration). Washington, D. C.: Human Solutions Inc./Metron Aviation.
26.
NormanD. A. (1990). The ‘problem’ with automation: Inappropriate feedback and interaction, not ‘over-automation.’Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B 327, 585-593.
27.
NormanK. L. (2008). Cyberpsychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
NunesA.MogfordR. H. (2003). Identifying controller strategies that support the ‘picture.’Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
29.
ParasuramanR.SheridanT. B.WickensC. D. (2008). Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2(2), 140-160.
30.
SheridanT. B. (2002). Humans and automation. New York: Wiley.
31.
SteinE.GarlandD. J. (1993). Air traffic control working memory (DOT/FAA/CT-TN93/37). Washington, DC: FAA.
WestrumR. (1991). Automation, information and consciousness in air traffic control. In WiseJ. A.HopkinV.D.SmithM. L. (Eds.), Automation and systems issues in air traffic control (pp. 367-380). Berlin: Springer-Verlag (NATO ASI Series Vol F73).
34.
WickensC. D.MavorA. S.ParasuramanR.McGeeJ. P. (Eds.). (1998). The Future of air traffic control. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35.
XingJ. (2006). Color Analysis in air traffic control displays, Part I. Radar displays (DOT/FAA/AM-06/22). Oklahoma City, OK: FAA, Civil Aeromedical Institute.
