Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The ability to lock on targets as quickly and easily as possible while maintaining speed and a tactically advantageous position is crucial to success in air combat. The capability of remote eye tracking systems has recently improved significantly and has opened up new possible applications. A modern eye-tracker was integrated in an advanced flight simulator environment and an experiment was conducted. The independent variable was target designation mode that was varied between: Heads-Up Display (HUD), Helmet Mounted Display (HMD) and a solution based on eye tracking. Eleven participants flew in the experiment and mean times to designate targets indicate significant advantages for the eye tracking based solution.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adam

E.C.

(1994). Head-up displays vs. helmet-mounted displays: The issues. In Hopper

D.G.

(Ed.), Proceedings of SPIE 2219 Cockpit Displays.

Äng

. (2007). Neck Pain in Air Force Pilots – On Risk Factors, Neck Motor Function and Exercise Intervention. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet.

Coakwell

M.R.

Bloswick

D.S.

Moser

(2004). High-Risk Head and Neck Movements at High G and Interventions to Reduce Associated Neck Injury. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 75 (1), 68-80.

Franck

McIntire

Marasco

Havig

(2009). Current and Future Helmet Mounted Displays for Piloted Systems. In Marasco

Havig

Jennings

Harding

(Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 7326, 73260C Head- and Helmet-Mounted Displays XIV: Design and Applications. doi:10.1117/12.820204

Havig

Goff

McIntire

Franck

(2009). Helmet-mounted displays: why haven’t they taken off? In Marasco

Havig

Jennings

Harding

(Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE 7326, 73260B Head-and Helmet-Mounted Displays XIV: Design and Applications. doi:10.1117/12.820202

Melzer

J.E.

Brozoski

F.T.

Letowski

T.R.

Harding

T. H.

Rash

C. E.

(2009). Guidelines for HMD design. In Rash

Russo

Letowski

Schmeisser

(Eds.), Helmet-mounted Displays: Sensation, Perception, and Cognition Issues. Fort Rucker, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory.

O’Connell

Rydbeck

Castor

Pousette

Englund

Gejke

Krantz

(2011). QATEP: Quick Access Target Eye Pointer – Förstudierapport (FOI-R–3198–SE). Stockholm: Swedish Defence Research Agency (in Swedish).

Olson

J.L.

Arbak

C.J.

Jauer

R.A.

(1991). Panoramic Cockpit Control and Display System - Volume II. PCCADS2000 (AFWAL-TR-88-1038). Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Wright Laboratory.

Openshaw

Taylor

(2006). Ergonomics and Design - A Reference Guide. Retrieved from http://www.allsteeloffice.com/NR/rdonlyres/3B6AC489-FC78-4B78-895A-0A5D8A9E888A/0/ErgoHandbook.pdf

10.

Perry

C.E.

Buhrman

J.R.

(1997). Head Mounted Display (HMD) Head and Neck Biomechanics. In Melzer

J.E.

Moffitt

(Eds.), Head Mounted Displays: Designing for the User. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

11.

Stahl

J.S.

(1999). Amplitude of human head movements associated with horizontal saccades. Experimental Brain Research. 126 (1), 41–54.

12.

Windle

W.F.

(1980). The spinal cord and its reaction to traumatic injury: Anatomy, Physiology, Pharmacology, Therapeutics. New York: M. Dekker.

13.

Woodson

Tillman

(1992). Human Factors Design Handbook. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Eye Tracking-Based Target Designation in Simulated Close Range Air Combat

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References