Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The valid assessment of engagement a player of serious games experiences is vital if future research is to focus on the role such a state has in improving learning outcomes. Researchers have attempted to do so by quantifying aspects of flow and immersion. Both constructs are distinctly defined in the literature yet feature a great amount of overlap when applied to the gaming domain to the point where they are often used to describe one-another. This work seeks to examine the ways in which these two constructs converge when assessed by two commonly-used measures, the Dispositional Flow State Scale (DFS-2) and the Immersive Tendencies Questionnaire (ITQ). Not only did we find a surprising lack of conceptual overlap between flow and immersion in this domain using these specific measures, the results suggested that the use of the DFS-2 and ITQ may not be adequate for use in the gaming domain. This pilot study reveals the necessity for a line of research further examining these two constructs and their measurement in gaming.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brockmyer

J. H.

Fox

C. M.

Curtiss

K. A.

McBroom

Burkhart

K. M.

Pidruzny

J. N.

(2009). The development of the Game Engagement Questionnaire: A measure of engagement in video game-playing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 624–634.

Chen

(2007). Flow in games (and everything else). Communications of the ACM, 50(4), 31–34.

Comrey

A. L.

Lee

H. B.

(1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cowley

Charles

Black

Hickey

(2008). Toward an understanding of flow in video games. Computers in Entertainment, 6(2), article 20.

Csikszentmihalyi

(1975). Play and intrinsic rewards. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 15, 41–63.

Csikszentmihalyi

(1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.

Dede

(1996). The evolution of constructivist learning environments: Immersion in distributed, virtual worlds. In Wilson

B. G.

(Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 165–175). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Douglas

Hargadon

(2000). The pleasure principle: Immersion, engagement, flow. Proceedings from The 11th ACM on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 153–160). New York, NY: ACM.

(2009). EGameFlow: A scale to measure learners’ enjoyment of e-learning games. Computers & Education, 52(1), 101–112.

10.

Jackson

S. A.

Eklund

R. C.

(2004). The flow scales manual. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.

11.

Jackson

S. A.

Martin

A. J.

Eklund

R. C.

(2008). Long and short measures of flow: The construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30(5), 561–587.

12.

Pavlas

Heyne

Bedwell

Lazzara

Salas

(2009). Game-based learning: The impact of flow state and videogame self-efficacy. Proceedings from The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53rd Annual Meeting (pp. 2398–2402). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.

13.

Przybylski

A. K.

Rigby

C. S.

Ryan

R. M.

(2010). A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 154–166.

14.

Shernoff

D. J.

Csikszentmihalyi

Schneider

Shernoff

E. S.

(2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176.

15.

Slater

(1999). Measuring presence: A response to the Witmer and Singer presence questionnaire. Presence, 8(5), 560–565.

16.

Wang

C. K. J.

Liu

W. C.

Khoo

(2009). The psychometric properties of Dispositional Flow Scale-2 in internet gaming. Current Psychology, 23(3), 194–201.

17.

Witmer

B. G.

Singer

M. J.

(1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225–240.

An Examination of Flow and Immersion in Games

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References