Cognitive distraction while driving often reduces the variability of lane position. However, data do not make clear whether this effect should be interpreted as a performance loss, indicating driver rigidity or unresponsiveness to external stimuli, or a performance improvement, indicating better vehicle control. To distinguish these possibilities, the present study assessed drivers’ responsiveness to heavy lateral winds under varying levels of working memory load. Cognitive load reduced the variability of lane position, increased drivers’ steering reversal rate, and increased the coherence between steering wheel position and lateral wind velocity. Results suggest that cognitive distraction improved lateral lane keeping, rather than inducing rigidified steering manipulation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlmH.NilssonL. (1994). Changes in driver behaviour as a function of handsfree mobile phones - A simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26(4), 441-451.
2.
AlmH.NilssonL. (1995). The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 27(5), 707-715.
3.
AndersenG. J.NiR. (2005). The spatial extent of attention during driving, Proceedings of the Third International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 395-400
BeedeK.KassS. (2006). Engrossed in conversation: The impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38(2), 415-421.
6.
BrookhuisK. A.de VriesG.de WaardD. (1991). The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 23(4), 309-316.
7.
BrookhuisK.De WaardD.MulderB. (1994). Measuring driving performance by car-following in traffic. Ergonomics, 37(3), 427-434.
8.
BrownI.TicknerA.SimmondsD. (1969). Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(5), 419-424.
9.
CairdJ.WillnessC.SteelP.ScialfaC. (2008). A metaanalysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(4), 1282-1293.
10.
DastrupE.LeesM.BecharaA.DawsonJ.RizzoM. (2010). Risky car following in abstinent users of MDMA. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(3), 867-873.
11.
GrootS.WinterJ. C. F.López-GarcíaJ. M.MulderM.WieringaP. A. (2011). The effect of concurrent bandwidth feedback on learning the lane keeping task in a driving simulator. Human Factors. 53: 50-62.
EngströmJ.JohanssonE.ÖstlundJ. (2005). Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(2 SPEC. ISS.), 97-120.
14.
HaigneyD.TaylorR.WestermanS. (2000). Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: Task demand characteristics and compensatory processes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 3(3), 113-121.
15.
HancockP.LeschM.SimmonsL. (2003). The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35(4), 501-514.
16.
HeJ.BecicE.LeeY.McCarleyJ. S. (2011). Mind Wandering Behind the Wheel: Performance and Oculomotor Correlates. Human Factors. 53 (1): 13-21.
17.
HorreyW.WickensC.ConsalusK. (2006). Modeling drivers’ visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(2), 67-78.
18.
JamsonA.MeratN. (2005). Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driver behaviour: Effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated rural driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(2 SPEC. ISS.), 79-96.
19.
JanacekG.J.2008. Spectral analysis. In: Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, second ed.John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
20.
JustM.KellerT.CynkarJ. (2008). A decrease in brain activation associated with driving when listening to someone speak. Brain Research, 1205, 70-80.
21.
KuboseT.BockK.DellG.GarnseyS.KramerA.MayhughJ. (2006). The effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(1), 43-63.
22.
LambleD.KauranenT.LaaksoM.SummalaH. (1999). Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 31(6), 617-623.
23.
MehlerB.ReimerB.CoughlinJ.DusekJ. (2009). Impact of incremental increases in cognitive workload on physiological arousal and performance in young adult drivers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 6-12.
24.
ÖstlundJ.CarstenO.MeratN.JamsonS.JanssenW.BrouwerR.. (2004). Deliverable 2—HMI and safety-related driver performance. Human Machine Interface And the Safety of Traffic in Europe (HASTE) Project, Report No. GRD1/2000/25361 S12.319626
25.
PattenC.KircherA.ÖstlundJ.NilssonL. (2004). Using mobile telephones: Cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(3), 341-350.
26.
RakauskasM.GugertyL.WardN. (2004). Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance. Journal of Safety Research, 35(4), 453-464.
27.
RecarteM.NunesL. (2000). Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Applied, 6(1), 31-43.
28.
RecarteM.NunesL. (2003). Mental workload while driving: Effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Applied, 9(2), 119-137.
29.
RedelmeierD. A.TibshiraniR.J. (1997). Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. The New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 453-458. Reed, M., & Green, P. (1999). Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialing task. Ergonomics, 42(8), 1015-1037.
30.
ReimerB. (2009). Impact of cognitive task complexity on drivers’ visual tunneling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 13-19.
31.
SonJ.ReimerB.MehlerB.PohlmeyerA.GodfreyK.OrszulakJ.LongJ.. (2010). Age and cross-cultural comparison of drivers’ cognitive workload and performance in simulated urban driving. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 11(4), 533-539.
32.
StrayerD.DrewsF.JohnstonW. (2003). Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 9(1), 23-32.
33.
StrayerD.JohnstonW. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychological Science, 12(6), 462-466.
34.
TheeuwesJ.AlferdinckJ. W. A. M.PerelM. (2002). Relation between glare and driving performance. Human Factors, 44, 95-107.
