Embodied Cognitive Fidelity (ECF) offers both a theoretical framework by which simulation may be considered in terms of contemporary cognitive theory and a methodology for application in effective and useful simulation tools. We overview the context for simulation use in human robot teams and offer ECF as an alternative to other foci of fidelity. We identify the criteria and attributes expected of simulations with high ECF and propose future considerations for research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baron-CohenSTager-FlusbergH.CohenD.J. (eds,) (2007). Understanding other minds: perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience – 2nd Edition.Oxford University Press.
2.
Cannon-BowersJ. A.BowersC. A. (2008). Synthetic learning environments: On developing a science of simulation, games and virtual worlds for training. In KozlowskiS. W. J.SalasE. (Eds.), Learning, Training, and Development in Organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
ClarkA. (2007). Re-inventing ourselves: the plasticity of embodiment, sensing, and mind. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 32:263–82.
4.
CookeN. J.ShopeS. M. (2004), Designing a synthetic task environment. In SchiflettS. G.ElliottL. R.SalasE.CoovertM. D.Scaled Worlds: Development, Validation, and Application, pp. 263-278. Surrey, England: England: Ashgate.
5.
DennettD. (1991). Real Patterns, The Journal of Philosophy87: 27-51.
6.
DurlachN. I.MavorA. S. (Eds.) (1995). Virtual Reality: Scienti®c and Technological Challenges, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
7.
EntinE.B.SerfatyD.ElliotL.R.SchiflettS. G. (2001). DMT-Rnet: An internet-based infrastructure for distributed multidisciplinary investigations of team performance. Proceedings of the Command and Control Research Technology Conference, Annapolis, MD.
8.
FidopiastisC.M.StapletonC.B.WhitesideJ.D.HughesC.E.FioreS.M.MartinG.A.RollandJ.P.SmithE.M. (2006). Human experience modeler: Context driven cognitive retraining to facilitate transfer of training. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: Special Issue: International Workshop on Virtual Reality, 9, 2, 183-187.
9.
FioreS. M. (2008). Interdisciplinarity as teamwork - How the science of teams can inform team science. Small Group Research, 39, 251-277.
10.
FioreS. M.JentschF.SalasE.FinkelsteinN. (2005). Cognition, Teams, and Augmenting Team Cognition: Understanding Memory Failures in Distributed Human-Agent Teams. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
11.
FioreS. M.Vogel-WalcuttJ. J. (2010). Making Metacognition Explicit: Developing a Theoretical Foundation for Metacognitive Prompting During Scenario-based Training. Proceedings of 54th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 2233-2237). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
12.
IckesW.GonzalezR. (1994). “Social” cognition and social cognition: From the subjective to the intersubjective. Small Group Research, 25, 294-315.
LarsonJ.R.ChristensenC. (1993). Groups as problem-solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 5-30.
15.
LevineJ.M.ResnickL.B.HigginsE.T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585-612.
16.
LimBeng-ChongKatherineKlein (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 403-418.
17.
LinJ.BlytheJ.ClarkS.DavarpanahN.HughstonR.ZydaM. (2010). Unbelievable Agents for Large Scale Security Simulation. Working Notes for the 2010 AAAI Workshop on Intelligent Security, 20-25.
18.
LucianiA.UrmaD.MarlièreS.ChevrierJ. (2004), Presence: the sense of believability of inaccessible worlds, Computers & Graphics, 28, 509–517.
19.
Marks MichelleA.ZaccaroStephen J.MathieuJohn E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (6), 971-986.
20.
Magnenat-ThalmannN.HyungSeokK.EggesA.GarcheryS. (2005), “Believability and Interaction in Virtual Worlds,” Multimedia Modelling Conference, 2005. MMM 2005. Proceedings of the 11th International, (pp. 2-9).
OullierO.BassoF. (2010). Embodied economics: how bodily information shapes the social coordination dynamics of decision-making. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 365: 291-301.
23.
SalasE.FioreS. M. (Editors). (2004). Team Cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24.
StrasserG.Dietz-UhlerB. (2001). Collective choice, judgment, and problem solving. In: HoggM.A.TindaleR.S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 31–55). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
25.
TaylorH. A.NaylorS. J.ChechileN. A. (1999). Goal-specific influences on the representation of spatial perspective. Memory & Cognition, 27, 309–319.
26.
WalmsleyJ. (2008). Methodological situatedness; or, DEEDS worth doing and pursuing. Cognitive Systems Research. 9:150–159.
