The concept of transitional objects from the British Object Relations school of psychoanalysis may offer insight into the affective aspects of the development of dyadic and triadic interactions. Furthermore the concept may be applied to the use of social robotics in autism research and therapy, with social robots in these settings perhaps functioning as transitional objects for autistic children. Possible applications in organizational contexts are suggested as well, along with considerations of future research relating transitional objects to the notions of primary and secondary intersubjectivity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baron-CohenS. (1997). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. MIT Press.
2.
BigelowA. E.MacLeanK.ProctorJ. (2004). The role of joint attention in the development of infants’ play with objects. Developmental Science, 7, 518–526.
3.
BreazealC. (2003). Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 59, 119–155.
4.
CharmanT. (2003). Why is joint attention a pivotal skill in autism?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 358, 315-324.
5.
CharmanT.SwettenhamJ.Baron-CohenS.CoxA.BairdG.DrewA. (1997). Infants with autism: An investigation of empathy, pretend play, joint attention, and imitation. Developmental Psychology, 5(33), 781-789.
6.
DavidsonD. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
FranklandA. (2010). The Little Psychotherapy Book: Object Relations in Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
GallagherS.HuttoD. (2008). Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. In ZlatevJ.RacineT.SinhaC.ItkonenE. (Eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9.
GordonJ.A.WilkersonW.M.ShafferD.W.ArmstrongE.G. (2001). “Practicing” medicine without risk: students’ and educators’ responses to high-fidelity patient simulation. Academic Medicine, 76(5): 469-472.
10.
KozimaH. (2002). Infanoid: a babybot that explores the social environment. In DautenhahnK.. (Eds), Socially Intelligent Agents: Creating Relationships with computers and robots (65-81). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
11.
KozimaH.MichalowskiM.P.NakagawaC. (2009). Keepon: A Playful Robot for Research, Therapy, and Entertainment. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 3-18.
RobinsB.DickersonP.StriblingP.DautenhahnK. (2004). Robot-mediated joint attention in children with autism: A case study in robot-human interaction. Interaction Studies, 5(2), 161-198.
15.
RochatP. (in press). Possession and morality in early development. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development.
16.
RycroftC. (1995). A Critical Dictionary of Psychoanalysis, Second Edition. London: Puffin.
17.
SacksO. (1995). An anthropologist on Mars: Seven paradoxical tales. New York: Knopf.
18.
StahlD.StrianoT. (2005). Joint attention in the first year: The coordination of gaze and affect between 7 and 10 months of age. In BerthouzeL.KaplanF.KozimaH.YanoH.KonczakJ.MettaG.NadelJ.SandiniG.StojanovG.BalkeniusC. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems. Lund University Cognitive Studies. 123.
19.
StorrA. (1989). Freud. Oxford University Press.
20.
StrianoT.StahlD. (2005). Sensitivity to triadic attention in early infancy. Developmental Science. 4(8), 333-343.
21.
StrianoT.StahlD.ClevelandA.HoehlS. (2006). Sensitivity to triadic attention between 6 weeks and 3 months of age. Infant Behavior and Development, 529-534.
22.
SubbotskyE. V. (1994). Early rationality and magical thinking in preschoolers: Space and time. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 97-108.
23.
TomaselloM.FarrarM.J. (1986). Joint Attention and Early Language. Child Development, 57, 1454-1463.
24.
TomaselloM.CarpenterM.CallJ.BehneT.MollH. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675 - 691.
25.
TrevarthenC. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: a description of primary intersubjectivity. In BullowaM. (Ed.), Before Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
TrillingL. (2000). The moral obligation to be intelligent: Selected essays. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
27.
WastellD.G. (1999). Learning dysfunctions in information systems development: Overcoming the social defense with transitional objects. MIS Quarterly, 23(4), 581-600.
28.
WinnicottD.W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena: A study of the first not-me possession. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34, 89-97.
