We provide a context within the converging fields of team cognition and human-robot interaction (HRI) where the idea of perspective may be able to provide a useful framework for design. Thus, we explore perspective as it has been discussed across disciplines. Our goal is to begin an exploration of how perspective can be appropriately conceptualized and potentially instantiated within the context of social robots and human-robot team interaction, framing theory from the human sciences for design.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsadaM.HosodaK.KuniyoshiY.IshiguroH.InuiT.YoshikawaY.OginoM.YoshidaC. (2009), “Cognitive Developmental Robotics: A Survey,” Autonomous Mental Development, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12-34.
2.
BalM. (1997). Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative (2nd Ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
3.
ArgallBrenna D.ChernovaSoniaVelosoManuelaBrowningBrettA survey of robot learning from demonstration, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Volume 57, Issue 5, 31May2009, Pages 469-483
4.
BockelmanP.FioreS.M.Team Cognition: Coordination across Individuals and Machines. In LeeJ.D.KirlikA. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Engineering, Vol. 1: Foundations, Perspectives and Cognitive Issues. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
DeChurchL. A.Mesmer-MagnusJ. R. (2010) Measuring Shared Team Mental Models: A Meta-Analysis. Group Dynamics, 14, 1-14.
6.
EliasJ.FioreS. M. (in press). Commentary on the Coordinates of Coordination and Collaboration. In SalasE.FioreS. M.LetskyM. (Eds.), Theories of Team Cognition: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
7.
EspinosaJ.A.LerchF.J.KrautR.E. (2004). Explicit versus implicit coordination mechanisms and task dependencies: One size does not fit all. In SalasE.FioreS.M. (Eds.) Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 107-129). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8.
FioreS. M.SalasE. (2004). Why we need team cognition. In SalasE.FioreS.M. (Editors). Team Cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 235-248). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9.
FioreS. M.SchoolerJ. W. (2004). Process mapping and shared cognition: Teamwork and the development of shared problem models. In SalasE.FioreS.M. (Editors). Team Cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 133-152). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.
FioreS. M.JohnstonJ.McDanielR. (2005). Applying the Narrative Form and XML Metadata to Debriefing Distributed Simulation-Based Exercises. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA.
11.
FrithU.de VignemontF. (2005). Egocentrism, Allocentrism, and Asperger Syndrom. Consciousness and Cognition14(4): 719-738.
12.
GallagherS. (2003). Phenomenology and experimental design. Journal of Consciousness Studies10 (9-10): 85-99.
13.
GoodrichM.A.SchultzA.C (2007). Human-Robot Interaction:A Survey.Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 1(3):203-275.
14.
HoffmannM.MarquesHArietaA.SumiokaH.LungarellaM.PfeiferR. (2010). "Body Schema in Robotics: A Review,"Autonomous Mental Development, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 2, no. 4, pp.304-324
15.
JaimesA.SebeN. (2005). “Multimodal Human Computer Interaction: A Survey,” Proc. 11th IEEE Int’l Workshop Human Computer Interaction
16.
MorrowP.FioreS. M.Team Cognition: Coordination across Individuals and Machines. In LeeJ. D.KirlikA.(Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Engineering, Vol. 1: Foundations, Perspectives and Cognitive Issues. NY: Oxford University Press.
17.
SalasE.FioreS. M. (Editors). (2004). Team Cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
ThomazA.CakmakM. (2009). Learning about objects with human teachers. In HRI ‘09: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Intl. Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
19.
VogeleyKFinkG (2003) Neural correlates of the first-person-perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences7: 38–42
20.
VogeleyK.GallagherS. (2011). The self in the brain. In GallagherS. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Self (111-36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
