The present study investigated the effects of task type (cognitive vs. sensory) and source complexity (number of displays to be monitored) of the performance, workload, and stress associated with vigilance. Results affirmed the utility of the cognitive-sensory task distinction of the vigilance taxonomy, although in contrast to previous research the cognitive task was associated with lower performance and higher levels of perceived workload and stress. The results also indicated that both task type and source complexity exhibited the typical performance-workload associations previously reported in research on sustained attention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakanP. (1959). Extraversion-introversion and improvement in an auditory vigilance task. British Journal of Psychology, 50, 325-332.
2.
DemberW. N.WarmJ.S.BowersJ.C.LanzettaT. (1984). Intrinsic motivation and the vigilance decrement. In MitalA. (Ed.), Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors I (pp. 21-26). North Holland: Elsevier.
3.
GrubbP. L.WarmJ.S.DemberW.N.BerchD.B. (1995). Effects of multiple signal discrimination on vigilance performance and perceived workload. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39, 1360-1364.
4.
HancockP.A.WarmJ.S. (1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors, 31, 519-537.
5.
HancockP.A. (1996). Effects of control order, augmented feedback, input device and practice on tracking performance and perceived workload. Ergonomics, 39(9), 1146-1162.
6.
HartS.G.StavelandL.E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In. HancockP.A.NajmedinM. (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). Oxford, England: North-Holland.
7.
HeltonW.S.MatthewsG.WarmJ.S. (2009). Stress state mediation between environmental variables and performance: The case of noise and vigilance. Acta Psychologica, 130, 204-213.
8.
MatthewsG.CampbellS.E. (1998). Task-induced stress and individual differences in coping. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 42, 821-825.
9.
MatthewsG.JoynerL.GillilandK.CampbellS.FalconerS.HugginsJ. (1999). Validation of a comprehensive stress state questionnaire: Towards a state ‘big three’? In: MervieldeI.DearyI.J.DeFruytF.OstendorfF. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (vol 7) (pp. 335-350). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
10.
MatthewsG.CampbellS.E.FalconerS.JoynerL.A.HugginsJ.GillilandKGrierR.WarmJ.S. (2002). Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry. Emotion, 2, 315-340.
11.
NoonanT.K.KarwowskiW.LoebM. (1985). Perception of challenge and difficulty in a cognitive vigilance task. In EbertsR. E.EbertsC.G. (Eds.), Trends in ergonomics/human factors II. (pp. 189193). Amsterdam: Elsevier (North-Holland).
12.
ParasuramanR.DaviesD.R. (1977). A taxonomic analysis of vigilance performance.In: MackieR.R. (Ed), Vigilance: Theory, operational performance, and physiological correlates (pp. 559-574). New York: Plenum Press.
13.
SeeJ.E.HoweS.R.WarmJ.S.DemberW.N. (1995). Meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 230-249.
14.
SheridanT. (1987). Supervisory control. In: SalvendyG. (Ed.), Handbook of human factors (pp. 1243-1268). New York: Wiley.
15.
TeoG.SzalmaJ.L. (2010). The effects of spatial and temporal task characteristics on performance, workload, and stress. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54, 1699-1703.
16.
TeoG.SzalmaJ.L. (in press) Predicting performance, subjective states and coping style during a vigilance task: the role of individual differences. Paper proposal submitted for the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 55.
17.
WarmJ.S.DemberW.N.HancockP.A. (1996) Vigilance and workload in automated systems. In: ParasuramanR.MoulouaM. (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 183-200). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
WarmJ.S.ParasuramanR.MatthewsG. (2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, 50, 433-441.
19.
WarmJ. S.HoweS.R.FishbeinH.D.DemberW.N.SpragueR.L. (1984). Cognitive Demand and the vigilance decrement. In MitalA. (Ed.), Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors I (pp. 15-20). North Holland: Elsevier.
