The objective of this study is to perform a pre-implementation assessment of workflows in private primary care clinics in Hong Kong. Data were collected through direct observations and in-depth semi-structured interviews from December 2009 to March 2010. Seventeen health care providers (5 physicians and 12 clinical assistants) of five local private primary care clinics participated in this study. Our findings 1) illustrate the work and information flow and step-by-step details of clinical work processes and 2) reveal gaps and weaknesses in the current clinical work system for possible application of an electronic medical records (EMR) sharing system. This preliminary EMR pre-implementation study demonstrates the inadequacy of the current work system and work processes and indicates the improvement opportunities offered by information technologies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. A.CulpL. M.ByronJ. S. (2005). Workflow assessment and redesign In WalkerJ. M.BieberE. J.RichardsF. (Eds.), Implementing an Electronic Health Record System (pp. 36-39). London: Springer.
2.
AshJ. S.BatesD. W. (2005). Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: Report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(1), 8-12.
3.
CarayonP.HundtA. S.KarshB. T.GursesA. P.AlvaradoC. J.SmithM.. (2006). Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 25(Suppl I), i50-i58.
4.
CarterJ. H. (2008). Electronic health records implementation: planning your implementation? In CarterJ. H. (Ed.), Electronic Health Records: A Guide for Clinicians and Administrators (2nd ed., pp. 407-418). Washington, DC: American College of Physicians.
5.
ChinT. (2006). Avoiding EMR meltdown: How to get your money’s worth. American Medical News.
6.
DesRochesC. M.CampbellE. G.RaoS. R.DonelanK.FerrisT. G.JhaA.. (2008). Electronic health records in ambulatory care – A national survey of physicians. [Article]. New England Journal of Medicine, 359(1), 50-60.
7.
DykesP. C.McGibbonM.JudgeD.LiQ.PoonE. G. (2005). Workflow analysis in primary care: implications for EHR adoption. Paper presented at the Annual Symposium of American Medical Informatics Association.
8.
FlickU. (2006). Chapter 17. Observation and ethnographyAn Introduction to Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9.
HeathC.LuffP. (1996). Documents and professional practice: ’bad’ organisational reasons for ’good’ clinical records.
10.
Hong Kong Legislative Council Panel on Health Services. (2009). Development of a territory-wide electronic health record sharing system. LC Paper No. CB(2) 1006/08-09(03), 1-43.
11.
KarshB.AlperS. J. (2004). Work system analysis: the key to understanding health care systemsAdvances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation, Volume 2 (pp. 337-348) AHRQ Publication Nos. 050021 (1-4). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
12.
LeungG. M.YuP. L. H.WongI. O. L.JohnstonJ. M.TinK. Y. K. (2003). Incentives and barriers that influence clinical computerization in Hong Kong: A population-based physician survey. [Article]. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10(2), 201-212.
13.
LorenziN. M.RileyR. T.BlythA. J. C.SouthonG.DixonB. J. (1997). Antecedents of the people and organizational aspects of medical informatics: Review of the literature. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4(2), 79-93.
14.
MaS.YuP.AlcockC. (2004). Workflow analysis, an important tool for identifying opportunities for ICT adoption in palliative care ward. Paper presented at the National Health Informatics Conference; Health Informatics Society of Australia.
15.
McGowanJ. J.CusackC. M.PoonE. G. (2008). Formative evaluation: A critical component in EHR implementation. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15(3), 297-301.
16.
OrC. K. L.CasperG.KarshB.BrennanP. F.BurkeL. J.CarayonP.. (2005). Work system analysis of home nursing care and implications for medication errors. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, 1052-1056.
17.
OrC. K. L.ValdezR.CasperG.CarayonP.BurkeL. J.BrennanP. F.. (2009). Human factors and ergonomics in home care: Current concerns and future considerations for health information technology. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 33(2), 201-209.
18.
SamuelsC. (2008). Electronic health records implementation: workflow. In CarterJ. H. (Ed.), Electronic Health Records: A Guide for Clinicians and Administrators (2nd ed., pp. 453-472). Washington, DC: American College of Physicians.
19.
SicotteC.DenisJ. L.LehouxP. (1998). The computer based patient record: A strategic issue in process innovation. Journal of Medical Systems, 22(6), 431-443.
20.
UnertlK. M.WeingerM. B.JohnsonK. B. (2006). Applying direct observation to model workflow and assess adoption. Paper presented at the Annual Symposium of American Medical Informatics Association.
21.
UnertlK. M.WeingerM. B.JohnsonK. B.LorenziN. M. (2009). Describing and modeling workflow and information flow in chronic disease care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16(6), 826-836.
