Abstract
In this paper, we explore the relationship between confidence and basic knowledge information collected prior to a forecast and forecast performance (i.e. achievement). Forecasters were asked at the beginning of the 2008 Major League Baseball season to predict end-of-year performance in five statistical categories for both hitters and pitchers. At the time of the initial forecast, participants were asked to rate the confidence in their forecast (0-100 scale) and were asked simple knowledge-based questions related to the player they were making forecasts about (e.g. player position and team). A regression analysis was used to compare the participant’s performance on the statistical categories with their knowledge and confidence. In general, there was a significant relationship between performance in the statistical categories and both knowledge and confidence when compared individually. However, given both confidence and knowledge, confidence provides no additional significant information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
