Abstract
To test the hypothesis that a plate applied to the plantar (tension) side of the medial midfoot provides stronger fixation than midfoot fusion with screw fixation, we biomechanically compared the two constructs for midfoot fusion. We created a model of midfoot instability in eight matched pairs of cadaver legs by section of joint capsule, ligaments, and tendons about Lisfranc's joints, and then performed a load-to-failure study to compare the fixation provided by a plantarly applied third tubular plate with that by cortical screws. After an initial load deformation curve to 1000 N was obtained, specimens were cyclicly loaded at 200 to 750 N for 3000 cycles and then loaded to failure (screw pullout, fracture, or deformation >3 mm). Comparing the plantar plate and midfoot fusion with screw fixation constructs, a plate applied to the plantar (tension) aspect of the medial midfoot provides a stronger, sturdier construct than does midfoot fusion with screw fixation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.