Relationship Between Neutral Subtalar Joint Position and Pattern of Rearfoot Motion During Walking

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the angle formed by the rearfoot when the subtalar joint is positioned in neutral and the pattern of rearfoot motion during walking. Each lower extremity for 50 healthy young adult subjects (mean age 25.5 years) was videotaped and the pattern of rearfoot motion was assessed using two-dimensional analysis. The results indicate that the rearfoot is slightly inverted before heel strike and that the average time to maximum pronation occurs at approximately 37.9% of the stance phase duration. Contrary to a previously published theory, the “neutral” position of the rearfoot for the typical pattern of rearfoot motion during the walking cycle was found to be resting standing foot posture rather than subtalar joint neutral position.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Ambled

Nigg

B.M.

Ekstrand

Three-dimensional measurement of rearfoot motion during running. J. Biomech., 23: (pp. 933–940), (1990.)

2. Bums

M.J.

Biomechanics.In Fundamentals of Foot Surgery. McGlamry

E.D.

(ed.), Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, (1988), (pp. 111–135)

3. Donatelli

The Biomechanics of the Foot and Ankle. Philadelphia, F. A. Davis, (1990), (pp. 17).

4. Engsberg

J.R.

Andrews

J.G.

Kinematic analysis of the talocalcaneal/talocrural joint during running support. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 19: (pp. 275–284), (1987.)

5. Kemozak

T.W.

Ricard

M.D.

Foot placement angle and arch type: effect on rearfoot motion. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 71: (pp. 988–991), (1990.)

6. Landis

J.R.

Koch

G.G.

The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33: (pp. 159–174), (1977.)

7. Levens

AS.

Inman

V.T.

Blosser

J.A.

Transverse rotation of the segments of the lower extremity in locomotion. J. Bone Joint Surg., 30A: (pp. 850–872), (1948.)

8. McPoil

T.G.

Brocato

The foot and ankle: biomechanicalevaluation and treatment. In

Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. Gould

(ed.). St. Louis, C. V. Mosby, (1990), (pp. 298).

9. McPoil

T.G.

Schuit

Knecht

H.G.

Comparison of three methods used to obtain a neutral plaster foot impression. Phys. Ther., 69: (pp. 446–452), (1989.)

10.

10. Root

M.L.

Orien

W.P.

Weed

J.H.

Clinical Biomechanics Normal and Abnormal Function of the Foot. Vd. 2. Los Angeles, Clinical Biomechanics Corp., (1977), (pp. 138–139).

11.

11. Root

M.L.

O'Brien

W.P.

Weed

J.H.

Hughes

R.J.

Biomechanical Examination of the Foot. Vol. 1. Los Angeles, Clinical Biomechanics Corp., (1971), (pp. 36–56).

12.

12. Scott

S.H.

Winter

D.A.

Talocrural and talocalcaneal joint kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking. J. Biomech., 24: (pp. 743–752), (1991.)

13.

13. Sgarlato

T.E.

Compendium of Podiatric Biomechanics. San Francisco. California College of Podiatry Press, (1971), (p. 86).

14.

14. Shrout

P.E.

Fleiss

J.L.

lntraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull., 86: (pp. 420–428), (1979.)

15.

15. Soutas-Little

R.W.

Beavis

G.C.

Verstraete

M.C.

Markus

T.L.

Analysis of foot motion during running using a joint coordinate system. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 19: (pp. 285–293), (1987.)

16.

16. Valmassy

R.L.

Advantages and disadvantages of various casting techniques. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc., 69: (pp. 707–712).(1979.)

17.

17. Wright

D.G.

Desai

S.M.

Henderson

W.H.

Action of the subtalar and ankle-joint complex during the stance phase of walking. J. Bone Joint Surg., 46A: (pp. 361–382). (1964.)