This article contains observations regarding history taking and physical examination of the foot and ankle which previously have not been compiled in this exact manner. The significance of the chief complaint in relation to problem solving is a major feature. The steps in the actual physical examination are related in a practical order. Terminology is reviewed. Documentation is stressed. The panorama of those involved in decisions relating to solving foot problems is placed in perspective. The general considerations reflect long-standing involvement in minuscule attention required to accurately arrive at a diagnosis. There may be more than one solution for a problem but only one accurate diagnosis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
. HauserEmil D.W.: Foot Examination. InDiseases of the Foot.Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Co.1939, pp. 42–46
2.
. WeedL.L.: Medical records that guide and teach. N. Engl. J. Med., 278:593–599 (Part I), 652–657 (Part II) 1968
3.
. LewinP.: History and physical examination of the foot. InThe Foot and Ankle.Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1941, pp. 58–70
4.
. GiannestrasN.J.: The well balanced normal foot. InFoot Disorders, Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1981, pp. 78–85
5.
. TrottA.W.: The normal foot—What is it? The Foot and Ankle (BatemanJ.E.TrottA.W. Ed) A Selection of Papers from the Orthopaedic Foot Society Meetings.Brian Decker, a Division of Thieme—Stratton Inc. New York, 1980
6.
. Du VriesH.L.: Principles of examination of the foot and ankle, InSurgery of the Foot, 3rd Ed., (InmanV.T. Ed) St. Louis, C. V. Mosby Co.1973, pp. 25–35
