EscuderoMIEscobarFAlbarránCFMedinaAPellegriniMJ.Minimally invasive vs open distal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus: a randomized controlled trial of short-term wound healing and 1-year outcomes. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(10):1092-1102. doi:10.1177/10711007251361121
2.
LamPMurphyEPChuaMJ, et al. Fourth-generation percutaneous transverse osteotomies for hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025;107(19):2185-2196. doi:10.2106/JBJS.24.01326
3.
LamPFletcherLWattC, et al. First metatarsal pronation correction after fourth-generation percutaneous transverse osteotomy for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(10):1071-1082. doi:10.1177/10711007251344273
4.
YoonYKShimDWHanSHLeeJWParkKH.One-month postoperative tibial sesamoid position predicts recurrence after minimally invasive hallux valgus correction: a retrospective cohort study. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(12):1360-1369. doi:10.1177/10711007251384646
5.
Bejarano-PinedaLAslanLBeldameJ, et al. Intraoperative radiation exposure with percutaneous vs hybrid hallux valgus correction: a comparative study. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(8):880-886. doi:10.1177/10711007251341894
6.
GuevaraCGFanfanDSchneppT, et al. Does use of allograft affect union rates in minimal invasive hallux valgus surgery?Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(7):740-746. doi:10.1177/10711007251337459
7.
LewisTLWattCFletcherL, et al. The filament union sign: prevalence and clinical outcomes of incomplete bone remodeling following percutaneous hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(9):1003-1015. doi:10.1177/10711007251346448
8.
CarvalhoKAMFayedABarbachan MansurNS, et al. Anatomical and micro-CT assessment of the first metatarsal head vascularization and soft tissue envelope following minimally invasive chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(1):102-114. doi:10.1177/10711007241298681
9.
LewisTLMansurHFerreiraGF, et al. Comparative biomechanical study of different screw fixation methods for minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery: A finite element analysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2025;31(2):160-169. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2024.09.001
10.
TogeiKShimaHHiraiY, et al. Relationship between the relative length of the second metatarsal and occurrence of metatarsalgia in patients with hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(2):217-226. doi:10.1177/10711007241298682
11.
TanakaKShimaHTogeiKHiraiYYasudaTOtsukiS.Postural stability in patients with bilateral hallux valgus—does the comorbid hammer toe affect stability?Foot Ankle Surg. 2025;31(8):732-736. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2025.05.002
12.
ChoiYHLeeSWAhnJHKimGJKangMHKimYC.Hallux valgus and pes planus: correlation analysis using deep learning-assisted radiographic angle measurements. Foot Ankle Surg. 2025;31(2):170-176. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2024.09.003
13.
WangCSHuánuco CasasEJLuoEJAckerASEasleyMEde Cesar NettoC.A comprehensive weightbearing computed tomography study on patients with hallux valgus: exploring multiplanar deformity interrelationships. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(3):343-356. doi:10.1177/10711007241309912
14.
de BuysMSaragasNPFerraoPNF.Why I want bunion surgery—the patient’s preoperative and postoperative perspective. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(4):410-414. doi:10.1177/10711007251321475
15.
PatelAWangJPatelTYPanchbhaviMPanchbhaviVK.Assessing the impact of nicotine and non-tobacco nicotine use on postoperative complications following hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Surg. 2025;31(8):749-754. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2025.05.008
16.
FerreiraGFde MirandaCREMatarézioMVP, et al. Mayo versus ankle block in minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery: a comparative study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2026;32(1):78-84. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2025.06.007
17.
MaDWangYXuC, et al. Biplane chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus: biomechanical effects of lateral and plantar displacement under simulated standing load. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(8):903-913. doi:10.1177/10711007251344255
18.
AttiaAKNjoku AustinCOClaytonEO, et al. Deformity correction and early maintenance of hallux valgus correction treated with modified Lapidus procedure: intermetatarsal miniature suture button vs first metatarsal to intermediate cuneiform cross-screw fixation. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(5):497-505. doi:10.1177/10711007251314813
19.
HamreMEMolundMHolstRNilsenFA.Association of radiologic and clinical outcomes after chevron osteotomy treatment of hallux valgus: average 6.5-year follow-up study in women. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(5):522-529. doi:10.1177/10711007251323877
20.
Piclet-LegreBSchenkelsEAmsellemDLalevéeMMicicoiL.Minimally invasive distal chevron with supination corrects first metatarsal pronation in hallux valgus: a retrospective weightbearing computed tomography study. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(12):1351-1357. doi:10.1177/10711007251351301
21.
Bejarano-PinedaLAshkani-EsfahaniSPeifferM, et al. Defining normative side-to-side differences in the distal tibiofibular joint of healthy individuals using weight-bearing CT 3D image analysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2025;31(7):583-586. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2025.02.015
22.
MilstreyAGartungSKlimekMWermersJRaschkeMJOchmanS.Assessing the need for additional syndesmotic stabilization in open reduction of the posterior malleolus: a biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025;107(12):1377-1385. doi:10.2106/JBJS.23.01088
23.
KaranjaANHo-HuynhAWalshTPlattSR.Ligamentous injuries in stable ankle fractures: an MRI-based study. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025;10(1):24730114251328694. doi:10.1177/24730114251328694
24.
MichalskiMPPorterGMRockovZA, et al. Weightbearing computed tomography evaluation of acute SER4a ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(1):37-45. doi:10.1177/10711007241298669
25.
DalenAFGregersenMGSkredeAL, et al. Effects of fibular plate fixation and deep posterior tibiotalar ligament repair on ankle stability in a Weber B fracture model with complete deltoid ligament sectioning. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(7):688-696. doi:10.1177/10711007251334085
26.
SogardOMcDonaldJWatersMELeeW.The clinical outcome comparison between trans-syndesmotic fixation and anatomic deltoid ligament repair in unstable ankle fractures with medial clear space widening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2025;31(2):95-104. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2024.08.008
27.
FlorentinoSARascoeASBerkAN, et al. Non-tobacco nicotine dependence is associated with increased risk of reoperation and complications after ankle fracture ORIF: a propensity-matched database study. Foot Ankle Int. 2026;47(2):143-152. doi:10.1177/10711007251390529
28.
KhojalyRRowanFEShahV, et al. Immediate weight-bearing compared with non-weight-bearing after operative ankle fracture fixation: results of the INWN pragmatic, randomized, multicenter trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025;107(13):1423-1438. doi:10.2106/JBJS.24.00965
29.
LabmayrVMartinelliMHuetterKHohenbergerGHolwegPOrnigM.Clinical outcomes of Lapidus arthrodesis with nitinol staples for hallux valgus correction. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025;10(3):1-9. doi:10.1177/24730114251353789
30.
BaluARDalloulJShenPC, et al. Comparative analysis of isolated nitinol staple fixation vs staple plus screw fixation in midfoot and hindfoot arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(6):622-628. doi:10.1177/10711007251329021
31.
AnastasioATWuKALuoEJNettoCDCEasleyME.Complications and early-term radiographic analysis of a novel active compression tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis nail with a proximal flexible coil. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025;10(1):1-9. doi:10.1177/24730114251323895
32.
KirilukSHVulcanoESchipperON, et al. Percutaneous Zadek osteotomy vs open Haglund resection for insertional Achilles tendinopathy: early outcomes and complication rates. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(10):1103-1114. doi:10.1177/10711007251359639
33.
CattolicoASergioFBoemioA, et al. Preliminary anatomical and surgical assessment of combined percutaneous resection and proximal medial gastrocnemius release vs historical controls in treating Haglund syndrome: a mixed prospective-retrospective study. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025;10(3):24730114251372601. doi:10.1177/24730114251372601
34.
HallSLewisTKaplanJRM, et al. Severity of Achilles tendinopathy on preoperative MRI and short-term functional outcomes after minimally invasive Zadek osteotomy. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025;10(1):24730114251322775. doi:10.1177/24730114251322775
35.
NicholsonCWBerletGCLeeTH.Prediction of the success of nonoperative treatment of insertional Achilles tendinosis based on MRI. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(4):472-477. doi:10.3113/FAI.2007.0472
36.
Hall KirilukSJohnsonAHKaplanJRM, et al. The effect of preoperative X/Y ratio on clinical outcomes following percutaneous Zadek osteotomy for insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(8):887-894. doi:10.1177/10711007251341890
37.
TournéYBarayALBarthélémyRMoroneyP.Contribution of a new radiologic calcaneal measurement to the treatment decision tree in Haglund syndrome. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104(8):1215-1219. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2018.08.014
38.
KaraismailogluBPeifferMSharmaS, et al. Impact of dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy on hindfoot alignment and biomechanics of patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy; a weightbearing CT-based simulation study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2025;31(3):264-272. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2024.11.002
39.
BhimaniRTamburiniLNayakR, et al. Plantar fascia strain and medial calcaneal tuberosity pressure after Zadek osteotomy: a cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(12):1441-1448. doi:10.1177/10711007251384636
40.
HintonZWKutzerKMMorrissetteKJ, et al. Weightbearing protocols and outcomes in open surgical management of Haglund syndrome: a large retrospective analysis. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025;10(1):24730114251316554. doi:10.1177/24730114251316554
41.
MorrissetteKJKutzerKMKrezAN, et al. Higher BMI is associated with wound breakdown following resection of Haglund deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(1):64-70. doi:10.1177/10711007241290225
42.
RubensonAMohaddesMCarlingMBergdahlC.Calcaneus fractures, epidemiology and treatment–data on 3 949 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register. Foot Ankle Surg. 2025;31(4):306-312. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2024.11.004
43.
SchneidermanBACarlsonBAJohnsonJPElsissyJG.Calcaneus fractures: a review of management, treatment, and recent advances. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2026;34(6):e821-e831. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00567
44.
PurdieSDHoskinsNSumarlieRJ, et al. Minimally invasive surgical techniques compared to an extensile lateral approach in the management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Foot Ankle Surg. 2025;31(6):473-485. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2025.02.012
45.
El BarbariJSMeyerMGrütznerPASwartmanBJVetterSYFrankeJ.Complication and revision rate in complex intraarticular calcaneal fractures: extended lateral vs sinus tarsi approach. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(5):530-539. doi:10.1177/10711007251322466
46.
SeaverTMZellerZTornettaP3rd, et al. Sinus tarsi versus extensile lateral approach for calcaneal fractures—a multicenter study. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025;9(11):e25.00313. doi:10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00313
47.
AnandSBelmonteADGrzeskiewiczEGrothAMartinKD.Radiographic results of percutaneous reduction of calcaneal fractures and posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis (C-PASTA). Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(7):679-687. doi:10.1177/10711007251333367
48.
VerstappenCDriessenMLSBrandtsL, et al. The role of early weight bearing in the aftertreatment of unilateral displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: a systematic review and pooled analysis. J Orthop Traumatol. 2025;26(1):43. doi:10.1186/s10195-025-00863-w
49.
BhimaniRHreskoAMWangKYKwonJY.Increased lateral calcaneal body and subtalar joint visualization utilizing a modified sinus tarsi approach. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(7):765-773. doi:10.1177/10711007251343530
50.
WakkerAMClaassenMVerhofstadMHJ, et al. The sural nerve & the calcaneus: a radiographic and anatomical study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2025;31(7):631-639. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2025.04.005
51.
ChoEPerezAAkwuoleFPinzurMSSchiffAPHamidKS.Incidence of peroneal tendon dislocation with talus fracture. Foot Ankle Surg. 2025;31(5):412-417. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2025.01.002
52.
FengHJiDDYangXQ, et al. Three-plane calcaneal osteotomy with joint preservation vs subtalar arthrodesis to treat painful calcaneal fracture malunions. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(3):295-302. doi:10.1177/10711007241310228
53.
GrünWVermorelPHLuoEJ, et al. Three-plane alignment of the second metatarsal improves reliability of weightbearing CT measurements in Lisfranc injury assessment. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025;10(3):24730114251372593. doi:10.1177/24730114251372593
54.
SaitoGHNishikawaDRCde OliveiraASJrFairbanksPJMoreira MendesAAPradoMP.Results of Lisfranc injuries treated with interosseous suture button fixation with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(5):506-513. doi:10.1177/10711007251322166
55.
SternJBodenAChoDKukadiaSKumarPDrakosM.Clinical outcomes after ORIF vs arthrodesis for subtle Lisfranc injuries: a minimum 2-year comparative study. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025;10(3):24730114251355490. doi:10.1177/24730114251355490
56.
SrokaOCampbellMThorneT, et al. Hardware removal after Lisfranc open reduction and internal fixation results in improved physical function. J Orthop Trauma. 2025;39(2):90-95. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002927
57.
Wilhelmina Maria EngelmannEHalmJASchepersT.Functional outcome and patient satisfaction after primary vs secondary arthrodesis for Lisfranc injuries: toward a single-surgery approach. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(1):46-53. doi:10.1177/10711007241288853
58.
CampbellMLSrokaOCThorneT, et al. Midfoot arthrodesis after failed Lisfranc open reduction and internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma. Published online April 14, 2025. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002994
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
