Patients with progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD), hallux valgus (HV), and midfoot arthritis (MA) could benefit from a bone-block tarsometatarsal (TMT) arthrodesis. The allograft wedge, producing distraction and plantarflexion, provides a stable medial column while correcting the deformity, but with increased risk of pseudoarthrosis. The objective of this study was to report the clinical nonunion and results of the bone-block first-TMT arthrodesis in collapsed feet.
Methods:
In this short-term prospective cohort (mean follow-up 17 months) we evaluated patients with PCFD, HV, and MA who underwent allograft bone-block first-TMT fusion between August 2020 and November 2022. Patients were kept nonweightbearing for 6 weeks and followed, having a WBCT at 3 months and subsequent follow-ups. Bone healing was determined by at least 50% of bone trabeculae crossing both graft interfaces. Complications were documented. Forefoot arch angle (FAA), Meary angle, talonavicular coverage angle (TNCA), middle facet subluxation (MFS), and foot and ankle offset (FAO) were obtained, as well as PROs.
Results:
Sixty-four patients (67 feet) were included, mean age 54.0 (18-77), body mass index 31.6 (29.6-33.6), 17.3 months (6-33) follow-up. Median allograft size was 8 mm (5-19 mm). Clinical nonunion rate was 11.9%, minor complications 2.9%, and major complications 5.9%. Tomographic healing at 3 months occurred in 86.4% and 66.7% at the most recent WBCT (mean: 10.1 months; 6-29). Improvement (P < .001) in FAA of 6.9 degrees (5.8-7.9), MFS of 22.6% (19.8-25.4), TNCA of 13.5 (12.1-14.3), Meary angle of 8.1 degrees (6.7-9.5), and FAO of 3.8% (3.1-4.6) were found. PROs improved for VAS, PROMIS-PH, PROMIS-PI, Pain Catastrophic Scale, and EFAS (P < .001).
Conclusion:
Although the first-TMT bone-block arthrodesis restored many markers associated with foot collapse and alignment, the clinical nonunion rate was 11.9%, which is in the top range of the literature for TMT fusions. The use of allograft wedges can explain our findings. Tomographic healing, initially 86.4% at 3 months, decreased to 66.7% at the most recent follow-up.
ArunakulMAmendolaAGaoYGoetzJEFeminoJEPhisitkulP.Tripod index: a new radiographic parameter assessing foot alignment. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(10):1411-1420. doi:10.1177/1071100713488761
2.
BargAHarmerJRPressonAPZhangCLackeyMSaltzmanCL. Unfavorable outcomes following surgical treatment of hallux valgus deformity: a systematic literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(18):1563-1573. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00975.
3.
BlackwoodSGossettL.Hallux valgus/medial column instability and their relationship with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Foot Ankle Clin. 2018;23(2):297-313. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2018.02.003
4.
BloomDAKaplanDJMojicaE, et al. The minimal clinically important difference: a review of clinical significance. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51(2):520-524. doi:10.1177/03635465211053869
5.
BuschAWegnerAHaversathMBrandenburgerDJägerMBeckS.First ray alignment in Lapidus arthrodesis - effect on plantar pressure distribution and the occurrence of metatarsalgia. Foot (Edinb). 2020;45:101686. doi:10.1016/j.foot.2020.101686
6.
ChenCLiZZhangY, et al. What’s the clinical significance of VAS, AOFAS, and SF-36 in progressive collapsing foot deformity. Foot Ankle Surg. 2024;30(2):103-109. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2023.10.002
7.
CifaldiAThompsonMAbichtB.Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with structural allograft for management of large osseous defects of the hindfoot and ankle: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;61(4):900-906. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2022.01.003
8.
ContiMSGarfinkelJHKunasGCDelandJTEllisSJ.Postoperative medial cuneiform position correlation with patient-reported outcomes following Cotton osteotomy for reconstruction of the stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(5):491-498. doi:10.1177/1071100718822839
9.
ContiMSWillettJFGarfinkelJH, et al. Effect of the modified lapidus procedure on pronation of the first ray in hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2020;41(2):125-132. doi:10.1177/1071100719883325
10.
CottonFJ.Foot statics and surgery. N Engl J Med. 1936;214:353-362.
11.
CoughlinMJGrimesJSTraughberPDJonesCP.Comparison of radiographs and CT scans in the prospective evaluation of the fusion of hindfoot arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(10):780-787. doi:10.1177/107110070602701004
12.
CoughlinMJKazA.Correlation of Harris mats, physical exam, pictures, and radiographic measurements in adult flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(7):604-612. doi:10.3113/FAI.2009.0604
13.
CychoszCCMizherRDigiovanniGMJonesACContiMSEllisSJ.Correlation of clinical outcomes and relative position of the first metatarsal after the modified lapidus procedure. Foot Ankle Int. 2024;45(9):979-987. doi:10.1177/10711007241255378
14.
DayJContiMSWilliamsNEllisSJDelandJTCodyEA.Contribution of first-tarsometatarsal joint fusion to deformity correction in the treatment of adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2020;5(3):247301142092732. doi:10.1177/2473011420927321
15.
de Cesar NettoCAhrenholzSIehlC, et al. Lapicotton technique in the treatment of progressive collapsing foot deformity. J Foot Ankle. 2020;14(3):301-308.
16.
de Cesar NettoCBangKMansurNS, et al. Multiplanar semiautomatic assessment of foot and ankle offset in adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2020;41(7):839-848. doi:10.1177/1071100720920274
17.
de Cesar NettoCEhretAWaltJ, et al. Early results and complication rate of the LapiCotton procedure in the treatment of medial longitudinal arch collapse: a prospective cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(5):2283-2295. doi:10.1007/s00402-022-04399-0
18.
de Cesar NettoCGodoy-SantosALSaitoGH, et al. Subluxation of the middle facet of the subtalar joint as a marker of peritalar subluxation in adult acquired flatfoot deformity: a case-control study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(20):1838-1844. doi:10.2106/JBJS.19.00073
19.
de Cesar NettoCSchonLCThawaitGK, et al. Flexible adult acquired flatfoot deformity: comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing measurements using cone-beam computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(18):e98. doi:10.2106/JBJS.16.01366
20.
de Cesar NettoCSilvaTLiS, et al. Assessment of posterior and middle facet subluxation of the subtalar joint in progressive flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2020;41(10):1190-1197. doi:10.1177/1071100720936603
21.
DockCCFreemanKLCoetzeeJCMcGaverRSGiveansMR.Outcomes of nitinol compression staples in tarsometatarsal fusion. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2020;5(3):2473011420944904. doi:10.1177/2473011420944904
22.
EttingerSAltemeierAStukenborg-ColsmanC, et al. Comparison of isolated screw to plate and screw fixation for tarsometatarsal arthrodesis including clinical outcome predictors. Foot Ankle Int. 2021;42(6):734-743. doi:10.1177/1071100720980014
23.
FerriMScharfenbergerAVGoplenGDanielsTRPearceD.Weightbearing CT scan of severe flexible pes planus deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(2):199-204. doi:10.3113/fai.2008.0199
24.
GlazebrookMBeasleyWDanielsT, et al. Establishing the relationship between clinical outcome and extent of osseous bridging between computed tomography assessment in isolated hindfoot and ankle fusions. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(12):1612-1618. doi:10.1177/1071100713504746
25.
GreeffWStrydomASaragasNPFerraoPNF. Radiographic assessment of relative first metatarsal length following modified lapidus procedure. Foot Ankle Int. 2020;41(8):972-977. doi:10.1177/1071100720924016
26.
GrossCEJacksonJB3rd. The importance of the medial column in progressive collapsing foot deformity: osteotomies and stabilization. Foot Ankle Clin. 2021;26(3):507-521. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2021.06.001
27.
HabbuRHolthusenSMAndersonJGBohayDR.Operative correction of arch collapse with forefoot deformity: a retrospective analysis of outcomes. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(8):764-773. doi:10.3113/fai.2011.0764
28.
HamiltonGAMullinsSSchuberthJMRushSMFordL.Revision lapidus arthrodesis: rate of union in 17 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007;46(6):447-450. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2007.08.005
29.
HeifnerJJMaterónSRZhangLGiovanniTPS. Union rates with the use of structural allograft in lapidus arthrodesis: a comparison between two fixation constructs. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023;62(1):91-95. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2022.05.004
30.
HoveidaeiAHRoshanshadAVosoughiAR.Clinical and radiological outcomes after arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Int Orthop. 2021;45(3):711-719. doi:10.1007/s00264-020-04807-3
31.
HungMBaumhauerJFBrodskyJW, et al. Psychometric comparison of the PROMIS physical function CAT with the FAAM and FFI for measuring patient-reported outcomes. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(6):592-599. doi:10.1177/1071100714528492
32.
HungMBaumhauerJFLicariFWVossMWBounsangaJSaltzmanCL.PROMIS and FAAM minimal clinically important differences in foot and ankle orthopedics. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(1):65-73. doi:10.1177/1071100718800304
33.
KomendaGAMyersonMSBiddingerKR.Results of arthrodesis of the tarsometatarsal joints after traumatic injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(11):1665-1676.
34.
LalevéeMBarbachan MansurNSRojasEO, et al. Prevalence and pattern of lateral impingements in the progressive collapsing foot deformity. Arch Orthop trauma Surg. 2023;143(1):161-168.
35.
LandisJRKochGG.The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174.
36.
LiSMyersonMS.Evolution of thinking of the lapidus procedure and fixation. Foot Ankle Clin. 2020;25(1):109-126. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2019.11.001
37.
LintzFBartonTMilletMHarriesWJHeppleSWinsonIG.Ground reaction force calcaneal offset: a new measurement of hindfoot alignment. Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;18(1):9-14. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2011.01.003
38.
LintzFBeaudetPRichardiGBrilhaultJ.Weight-bearing CT in foot and ankle pathology. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107(1S):102772. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102772
39.
LintzFWelckMBernasconiA, et al. 3D biometrics for hindfoot alignment using weightbearing CT. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(6):684-689. doi:10.1177/1071100717690806
40.
LukPCJohnsonJEMcCormickJJKleinSE.First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis technique with interposition allograft bone block. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(8):936-943. doi:10.1177/1071100715577953
MyersonMSBadekasA.Hypermobility of the first ray. Foot Ankle Clin. 2000;5(3):469-484.
43.
NishikawaDRCDuarteFASaitoGH, et al. Is there a tolerance for extension of the first metatarsal after the Lapidus procedure? A clinical, functional, and hindfoot radiographic analysis. Int Orthop. 2024;48(1):103-109. doi:10.1007/s00264-023-05932-5
44.
NishikawaDRCDuarteFASaitoGHde Cesar NettoCMirandaBRDPradoMP. Correlation of first metatarsal sagittal alignment with clinical and functional outcomes following the Lapidus procedure. Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;28(4):438-444. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2021.08.009
45.
NishikawaDRCDuarteFASaitoGHde MirandaBRFenelonEJAPradoMP. Is first metatarsal shortening correlated with clinical and functional outcomes following the Lapidus procedure?Int Orthop. 2021;45(11):2927-2931. doi:10.1007/s00264-021-05199-8
46.
PasqualiniITeplenskyJRTuranO, et al. Establishment of minimum clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state thresholds for Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and visual analog scale scores after hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2025;46(1):83-91. doi:10.1177/10711007241298675
47.
RichterMAgrenPHBesseJL, et al. EFAS Score - Multilingual development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) by the score committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS). Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;24(3):185-204. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2018.05.004
48.
SangeorzanBJHintermannBde Cesar NettoC, et al. Progressive collapsing foot deformity: consensus on goals for operative correction. Foot Ankle Int. 2020;41(10):1299-1302. doi:10.1177/1071100720950759
49.
SangeorzanBJMoscaVHansenSTJr.Effect of calcaneal lengthening on relationships among the hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot. Foot Ankle. 1993;14(3):136-141. doi:10.1177/107110079301400305
50.
SangeorzanBJVerthRGHansenST.Salvage of Lisfranc’s tarsometatarsal joint by arthrodesis. Foot Ankle. 1990;10(4):193-200. doi:10.1177/107110079001000401
51.
ScottWWidemanTHSullivanMJ.Clinically meaningful scores on pain catastrophizing before and after multidisciplinary rehabilitation: a prospective study of individuals with subacute pain after whiplash injury. Clin J Pain. 2014;30(3):183-190. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e31828eee6c
52.
SorensenMDHyerCFBerletGC.Results of lapidus arthrodesis and locked plating with early weight bearing. Foot Ankle Spec. 2009;2(5):227-233. doi:10.1177/1938640009348389
53.
StreeterSRKushSCororatonAHenryJKEllisSJContiMS.Defining the patient acceptable symptom state using PROMIS following reconstruction of the progressive collapsing foot deformity. Foot Ankle Surg. 2024;30(6):504-509. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.002
54.
ThomasTFarougRKhanSMorganSBallesterJS.Comparison of Scarf-Akin osteotomy with Lapidus-Akin fusion in cases of hallux valgus with a disrupted Meary’s line: a case series study. Foot (Edinb). 2021;49:101747. doi:10.1016/j.foot.2020.101747
55.
ThompsonIMBohayDRAndersonJG.Fusion rate of first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis in the modified Lapidus procedure and flatfoot reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(9):698-703. doi:10.1177/107110070502600906
56.
UsuelliFGTaminiJMaccarioCGrassiMTanEW.Bone-block arthrodesis procedure in failures of first metatarsophalangeal joint replacement. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;23(3):163-167. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2017.03.003
57.
WilleggerMBencaEHirtlerL, et al. Biomechanical stability of tape augmentation for anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair compared to the native ATFL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(4):1015-1021. doi:10.1007/s00167-016-4048-7
58.
WilleggerMHolinkaJRistlRWanivenhausAHWindhagerRSchuhR.Correction power and complications of first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis for hallux valgus deformity. Int Orthop. 2015;39(3):467-476. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2601-x
59.
YoshimotoKNoguchiMMarukiHNasuYIshibashiMOkazakiK.How does the postoperative medial arch height influence the patient reported outcomes of stage II acquired adult flatfoot deformity?J Orthop Sci. 2022;27(2):429-434. doi:10.1016/j.jos.2020.12.018
60.
ZhangJZLintzFBernasconiA; Weight Bearing CT International Study Group, Zhang S. 3D biometrics for hindfoot alignment using weightbearing computed tomography. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(6):720-726. doi:10.1177/1071100719835492
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
