Progressive collapsing flatfoot deformity (PCFD) describes the pathologic form of a flatfoot (pes planus). Pes planus is often treated with lateral column–lengthening (LCL) procedures such as the Evans LCL. The Z-osteotomy has been explored as an alternative to the Evans LCL. We aim to compare bone position using radiographs and dynamic movement using a robotic gait simulator (RGS).
Methods:
Flatfoot was produced in cadaveric specimens by attenuating medial arch supporting ligaments and cyclically loading through the tibia. Clinical diagnostic measures from radiographs were used to assess foot shape. Each flatfoot underwent testing on the RGS with ground reaction forces scaled to 25% of the donor’s body weight and the stance phase simulated 6 times slower than physiologic gait (4.09 seconds). After flatfoot data collection, one foot in each pair received either the Evans LCL or Z-osteotomy. Postoperative radiographs were taken, and the feet were again tested on the RGS. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected and compared for both flatfoot and postsurgical trials.
Results:
All radiographic parameters were significantly (P < .05) different after the flattening procedure, indicating arch collapse, forefoot abduction, and hindfoot eversion. The calcaneal pitch angle decreased, although not to the level seen in physiologic flatfoot. Changes toward arch restoration were seen in the radiographic parameters after surgeries, but there were no radiographic differences between surgery type for the number of specimens we tested (7 pairs). Peak pressure under the lateral forefoot significantly (P < .05) increased after both surgeries but did not differ between procedures. Kinematic data only showed a few differences between the Evans and the Z-osteotomy.
Conclusion:
Radiographic evidence demonstrated that our model produced a mild flatfoot from neutrally aligned cadaveric specimens, and postsurgical feet showed significant improvement (P < .05). Few differences between the surgical techniques were seen in the kinematic and kinetic data.
Clinical Relevance:
This cadaveric simulation study found that the Evans and Z-osteotomies are similar in their ability to biomechanically address mild flatfoot.
ArangioGRogmanAReedJF.Hindfoot alignment valgus moment arm increases in adult flatfoot with Achilles tendon contracture. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(11):1078-1082.
2.
ArangioGAChopraVVoloshinASalatheEP.A biomechanical analysis of the effect of lateral column lengthening calcaneal osteotomy on the flat foot. Clin Biomech. 2007;22(4):472-477.
3.
AubinPMWhittakerELedouxWR.A robotic cadaveric gait simulator with fuzzy logic vertical ground reaction force control. IEEE Trans Robot. 2012;28(1):246-255.
4.
BaghdadiTMazoochyHGuityMHeidari khabbazN.Evaluation of clinical and radiological results of calcaneal lengthening osteotomy in pediatric idiopathic flexible flatfoot. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018;6(5):402-411.
5.
BatesDMaechlerMBolkerB.lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes. R package version 0.999375-42; 2011.
6.
BaxterJRDemetracopoulosCAPradoMPGilbertSLTharmviboonsriTDelandJT.Graft shape affects midfoot correction and forefoot loading mechanics in lateral column lengthening osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(11):1192-1199.
7.
BaxterJRDemetracopoulosCAPradoMPTharmviboonsriTDelandJT.Lateral column lengthening corrects hindfoot valgus in a cadaveric flatfoot model. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(6):705-709.
8.
BenthienRAParksBGGuytonGPSchonLC.Lateral column calcaneal lengthening, flexor digitorum longus transfer, and opening wedge medial cuneiform osteotomy for flexible flatfoot: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(1):70-77.
BlumanEMTitleCIMyersonMS.Posterior tibial tendon rupture: a refined classification system. Foot Ankle Clin. 2007;12(2):233-249, v.
11.
BuldtAKForghanySLandorfKBLevingerPMurleyGSMenzHB.Foot posture is associated with plantar pressure during gait: a comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet. Gait Posture. 2018;62:235-240.
DavittJSMacWilliamsBAArmstrongPF.Plantar pressure and radiographic changes after distal calcaneal lengthening in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(1):70.
14.
De CockAVanrenterghemJWillemsTWitvrouwEDe ClercqD. The trajectory of the centre of pressure during barefoot running as a potential measure for foot function. Gait Posture. 2008;27(4):669-675.
15.
DelandJTde AslaRJSungIHErnbergLAPotterHG.Posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: which ligaments are involved?Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(6):427-435.
16.
DemetracopoulosCANairPMalzbergADelandJT.Outcomes of a stepcut lengthening calcaneal osteotomy for adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(7):749-755.
17.
DumontierTAFalicovAMoscaVSangeorzanB.Calcaneal lengthening: investigation of deformity correction in a cadaver flatfoot model. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(2):166-170.
18.
DunnJELinkCLFelsonDTCrincoliMGKeysorJJMcKinlayJB.Prevalence of foot and ankle conditions in a multiethnic community sample of older adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(5):491-498.
19.
EllisSJDeyerTWilliamsBR, et al. Assessment of lateral hindfoot pain in acquired flatfoot deformity using weightbearing multiplanar imaging. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(5):361-371.
20.
EllisSJWilliamsBRGargRCampbellGPavlovHDelandJT.Incidence of plantar lateral foot pain before and after the use of trial metal wedges in lateral column lengthening. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(7):665-673.
21.
EllisSJYuJCJohnsonAHElliottAO’MalleyMDelandJ.Plantar pressures in patients with and without lateral foot pain after lateral column lengthening. JBJS. 2010;92(1):81.
22.
EllisSJYuJCWilliamsBRLeeCChiuY-LDelandJT.New radiographic parameters assessing forefoot abduction in the adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(12):1168-1176.
23.
EvansD.Calcaneo-valgus deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975;57(3):270-278.
24.
GriendRV.Lateral column lengthening using a “Z” osteotomy of the calcaneus. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;7(4):257-263.
25.
HenryJKHoffmanJKimJ, et al. The foot and ankle kinematics of a simulated progressive collapsing foot deformity during stance phase: a cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Int. 2022;43(12):1577-1586.
26.
HurschlerCEmmerichJWülkerN.In vitro simulation of stance phase gait, part I: model verification. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(8):614-622.
27.
ImhauserCWSieglerSAbidiNAFrankelDZ.The effect of posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction on the plantar pressure characteristics and the kinematics of the arch and the hindfoot. Clin Biomech. 2004;19(2):161-169.
KettelkampDBAlexanderHH.Spontaneous rupture of the posterior tibial tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(4):759-764.
31.
KimKJKitaokaHBLuoZP, et al. In vitro simulation of the stance phase in human gait. J Musculoskelet Res. 2001;5(2):113-121.
32.
KitaokaHBAhnTKLuoZPAnKN.Stability of the arch of the foot. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18(10):644-648.
33.
LeeDGDavisBL.Assessment of the effects of diabetes on midfoot joint pressures using a robotic gait simulator. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(8):767-772.
34.
LeeKMChungCYParkMSLeeSHChoJHChoiIH.Reliability and validity of radiographic measurements in hindfoot varus and valgus. JBJS. 2010;92(13):2319.
35.
LogelKJParksBGSchonLC.Calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis and first metatarsocuneiform arthrodesis for correction of acquired flatfoot deformity in a cadaver model. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(4):435-440.
ManiSDelandJ.Lateral column lengthening and how to achieve good correction. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;13(1):23-28.
38.
MyersonMS.Adult acquired flatfoot deformity: treatment of dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon. Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:393-405.
39.
MyersonMSBadekasASchonLC.Treatment of stage II posterior tibial tendon deficiency with flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer and calcaneal osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(7):445-450.
40.
MyersonMSThordarsonDBJohnsonJE, et al. Classification and nomenclature: progressive collapsing foot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2020;41(10):1271-1276.
41.
NessMELongJMarksRHarrisG.Foot and ankle kinematics in patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Gait Posture. 2008;27(2):331-339.
42.
NesterCJLiuAMWardE, et al. In vitro study of foot kinematics using a dynamic walking cadaver model. J Biomech. 2007;40(9):1927-1937.
43.
NikiHChingRPKiserPSangeorzanBJ.The effect of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction on hindfoot kinematics. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22(4):292-300.
44.
OeffingerDJPectolRWTylkowskiCM.Foot pressure and radiographic outcome measures of lateral column lengthening for pes planovalgus deformity. Gait Posture. 2000;12(3):189-195.
45.
OhIImhauserCChoiDWilliamsBEllisSDelandJ.Sensitivity of plantar pressure and talonavicular alignment to lateral column lengthening in flatfoot reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(12):1094-1100.
46.
OkitaNMeyersSAChallisJHSharkeyNA.An objective evaluation of a segmented foot model. Gait Posture. 2009;30(1):27-34.
47.
ParsonsSNaimSRichardsPJMcBrideD.Correction and prevention of deformity in type II tibialis posterior dysfunction. Clin Orthop. 2010;468(4):1025-1032.
48.
PihlCMStenderCJBalasubramanianREdingerKMSangeorzanBJLedouxWR.Passive engineering mechanism enhancement of a flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer procedure. J Orthop Res. 2018;36(11):3033-3042.
49.
RaikinSMWintersBSDanielJN.The RAM classification: a novel, systematic approach to the adult-acquired flatfoot. Foot Ankle Clin. 2012;17(2):169-181.
50.
R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011.
51.
RichterMZechS.Lengthening osteotomy of the calcaneus and flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer in flexible flatfoot deformity improves talo-1st metatarsal-index, clinical outcome and pedographic parameter. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;19(1):56-61.
52.
RosenfeldPFDickJSaxbyTS.The response of the flexor digitorum longus and posterior tibial muscles to tendon transfer and calcaneal osteotomy for stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(9):671-674.
SangeorzanBJHintermannBde Cesar NettoC, et al. Progressive collapsing foot deformity: consensus on goals for operative correction. Foot Ankle Int. 2020;41(10):1299-1302.
55.
SangeorzanBJMoscaVHansenST.Effect of calcaneal lengthening on relationships among the hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot. Foot Ankle. 1993;14(3):136-141.
56.
SaundersSMEllisSJDemetracopoulosCAMarinescuABurkettJDelandJT.Comparative outcomes between step-cut lengthening calcaneal osteotomy vs traditional Evans osteotomy for stage IIB adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(1):18-27.
57.
ScottRTBerletGC.Calcaneal Z osteotomy for extra-articular correction of hindfoot valgus. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52(3):406-408.
58.
SmithBAAdelaarRSWayneJS.Patient specific computational models to optimize surgical correction for flatfoot deformity. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(7):1523-1531.
59.
TienTRParksBGGuytonGP.Plantar pressures in the forefoot after lateral column lengthening: a cadaver study comparing the Evans osteotomy and calcaneocuboid fusion. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(7):520-525.
60.
VaudreuilNJLedouxWRRoushGCWhittakerECSangeorzanBJ.Comparison of transfer sites for flexor digitorum longus in a cadaveric adult acquired flatfoot model. J Orthop Res. 2014;32(1):102-109.
61.
WatanabeKKitaokaHBFujiiT, et al. Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction and flatfoot: analysis with simulated walking. Gait Posture. 2013;37(2):264-268.
62.
WhittakerECAubinPMLedouxWR.Foot bone kinematics as measured in a cadaveric robotic gait simulator. Gait Posture. 2011;33(4):645-650.
63.
WillauerPSangeorzanBJWhittakerECShoferJBLedouxWR.The sensitivity of standard radiographic foot measures to misalignment. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(12):1334-1340.
64.
WilliamsDSMcClayIS.Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 2000;80(9):864-864.
65.
YoungerASSawatzkyBDrydenP.Radiographic assessment of adult flatfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(10):820-825.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
