Circular frames for ankle fusion are reserved for complex clinical scenarios. The literature is heterogenous and conflicting. We aim to present the indications and outcomes of this procedure.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort study based on a prospective database of frame surgeries performed in a tertiary institution. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing complex ankle fusion with circular frames between 2005 and 2020, with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical indications, comorbidities, surgical procedures, external fixator time (EFT), length of stay (LOS), radiologic and clinical outcomes, and adverse events. Factors influencing radiologic and clinical outcomes were analyzed.
Results:
47 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 30 months (interquartile range [IQR] 20-40). The median age at time of surgery was 63.5 years (IQR 58-71). Patients had a median of 2 previous surgeries (IQR 1-3). The median LOS was 8.5 days, and median EFT was 237 days (IQR 166-280). Simultaneous limb lengthening (median 3.3 cm, IQR 1.9-3.5) was performed in 11 patients, increasing the EFT by a mean of 4 months. Primary and final union rates were 91.5% and 95.7%, respectively. At last follow-up, ASAMI bone scores were excellent or good in 87.2%. ASAMI functional scores were good in 79.1%. Patient satisfaction was 83.7%. In addition, 97.7% of patients experienced adverse events, most commonly pin-site related, with major complications in 30.2% and reoperations in 60.5%. There were 3 amputations. Adverse events were associated with increased age, poor soft tissue condition, severe deformities, subtalar fusions, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and prolonged EFT.
Conclusion:
Complex ankle fusion using circular frames can achieve good outcomes, however time in frame may be prolonged with a high rate of adverse events. Identified risk factors for poorer outcomes should be considered in patient counselling and prognostication.
Abdel-Aleem AhmedASAbdelshafi TablE.Treatment of open intraarticular distal femur fractures by Ilizarov fixator; an approach to improve the outcome with mid-term results. Injury. 2019;50(10):1731-1738. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2019.05.011
2.
AbuhantashMVeljkovicAWingK, et al. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: a 5-year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104(13):1197-1203. doi:10.2106/JBJS.21.01088
3.
AbulaitiAYilihamuYYashengTAlikeYYusufuA.The psychological impact of external fixation using the Ilizarov or orthofix LRS method to treat tibial osteomyelitis with a bone defect. Injury. 2017;48(12):2842-2846. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2017.10.036
4.
AtefAEl-RosasyMEl-TantawyA.Salvage arthrodesis for infected ankle fractures with segmental bone-loss using Ilizarov concepts: a prospective study. Int Orthop. 2021;45(1):233-240. doi:10.1007/s00264-020-04874-6
5.
BaiZYangYChenS, et al. Clinical effectiveness of arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis for advanced ankle arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(10):e24998. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000024998
6.
BerletGCBaumhauerJFGlazebrookM, et al. The impact of patient age on foot and ankle arthrodesis supplemented with autograft or an autograft alternative (rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP). JB JS Open Access. 2020;5(4):e20.00056. doi:10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00056
7.
BuckPMorreyBFChaoEY.The optimum position of arthrodesis of the ankle. A gait study of the knee and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(7):1052-1062.
8.
ChalayonOWangBBlankenhornB, et al. Factors affecting the outcomes of uncomplicated primary open ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(10):1170-1179. doi:10.1177/1071100715587045
9.
ChaudharyMMLakhaniPH.Double-level fixator-assisted nailing (DL-FAN). Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(2):178-188. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.101B2.BJJ-2018-0622.R1
10.
CobeyJC.Posterior roentgenogram of the foot. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;118:202-207.
DindoDDemartinesNClavienPA.Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-213. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
13.
El-AlfyB.Arthrodesis of the ankle joint by Ilizarov external fixator in patients with infection or poor bone stock. Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;16(2):96-100. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2009.06.004
14.
EylonSPoratSBorNLeibnerED.Outcome of Ilizarov ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(8):873-879. doi:10.3113/FAI.2007.0873
15.
FeibelRJUhthoffHK.Primary Ilizarov ankle fusion for nonreconstructable tibial plafond fractures. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2005;17(4-5):457-480. doi:10.1007/s00064-005-1139-5.Article in German.
16.
FourmanMSBorstEWBognerERozbruchSRFragomenAT.Recombinant human BMP-2 increases the incidence and rate of healing in complex ankle arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(2):732-739. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3261-7
17.
FragomenATBorstESchachterLLymanSRozbruchSR.Complex ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov method yields high rate of fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(10):2864-2873. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2470-9
18.
FriggANiggBDavisEPedersonBValderrabanoV.Does alignment in the hindfoot radiograph influence dynamic foot-floor pressures in ankle and tibiotalocalcaneal fusion?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(12):3362-3370. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1449-7
19.
GessmannJOzokyayLFehmerTMuhrGSeyboldD.Arthrodesis of the infected ankle joint: results with the Ilizarov external fixator. Z Orthop Unfall. 2011;149(2):212-218. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1250360. Article in German.
20.
GuptaSMalhotraAMittalNGargSKJindalRKansayR.The management of infected nonunion of tibia with a segmental defect using simultaneous fixation with a monorail fixator and a locked plate. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(8):1094-1099. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2017-1442.R1
21.
HasanOFahadSSattarSUmerMRashidH.Ankle arthrodesis using Ilizarov ring fixator: a primary or salvage procedure? An analysis of twenty cases. Malays Orthop J. 2018;12(3):24-30. doi:10.5704/MOJ.1811.006
IliadisADPalloniVWrightJGoodierDCalderP.Pediatric lower limb lengthening using the PRECICE nail: our experience with 50 cases. J Pediatr Orthop. 2021;41(1):e44-e49. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000001672
24.
IobstCLiuR.A systematic review of incidence of pin tract infections associated with external fixation. J Limb Length Reconstr. 2016;2(1):6-16.
25.
IobstCARozbruchSRNelsonSFragomenA.Simultaneous acute femoral deformity correction and gradual limb lengthening using a retrograde femoral nail: technique and clinical results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(7):241-250. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00573
KatsenisDBhaveAPaleyDHerzenbergJE.Treatment of malunion and nonunion at the site of an ankle fusion with the Ilizarov apparatus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(2):302-309. doi:10.2106/JBJS.C.01421
28.
KhanfourAA.Versatility of Ilizarov technique in difficult cases of ankle arthrodesis and review of literature. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;19(1):42-47. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2012.10.001
29.
KovoorCCPadmanabhanVBhaskarDGeorgeVVViswanathS.Ankle fusion for bone loss around the ankle joint using the Ilizarov technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(3):361-366. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.20935
30.
KrauseFYoungerASBaumhauerJF, et al. Clinical outcomes of nonunions of hindfoot and ankle fusions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(23):2006-2016. doi:10.2106/JBJS.14.00872
31.
LiantisPMavrogenisAFStavropoulosNA, et al. Risk factors for and complications of distraction osteogenesis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24(5):693-698. doi:10.1007/s00590-013-1261-7
32.
LouTFHamushanMLiHWangCYChaiYHanP.Staged distraction osteogenesis followed by arthrodesis using internal fixation as a form of surgical treatment for complex conditions of the ankle. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(6):755-760. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.100B6.BJJ-2017-1188.R1
33.
MaffuliNFixsenJA.Distraction osteogenesis in congenital limb length discrepancy: a review. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1996;41(4):258-264.
34.
McCoyTHGoldmanVFragomenATRozbruchSR.Circular external fixator-assisted ankle arthrodesis following failed total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(11):947-955. doi:10.3113/FAI.2012.0947
35.
McKeeMDDiPasqualeDJWildLMStephenDJKrederHJSchemitschEH.The effect of smoking on clinical outcome and complication rates following Ilizarov reconstruction. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(10):663-667. doi:10.1097/00005131-200311000-00001
36.
McNallyMFergusonJKuganRStubbsD.Ilizarov treatment protocols in the management of infected nonunion of the tibia. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(Suppl 5):S47-S54. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000987
37.
MonteagudoMMartinez-de-AlbornozP.Deciding between ankle and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis. Foot Ankle Clin. 2022;27(1):217-231. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2021.11.012
38.
MorasiewiczPDejnekMUrbanskiWDraganSLKulejMDraganSF.Radiological evaluation of ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation compared to internal fixation. Injury. 2017;48(7):1678-1683. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.013
39.
MoriSAkagiMKikuyamaAYasudaYHamanishiC.Axial shortening during distraction osteogenesis leads to enhanced bone formation in a rabbit model through the HIF-1α/vascular endothelial growth factor system. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(4):653-663. doi:10.1002/jor.20076
40.
NaudeJManjraMBirkholtzFF, et al. Outcomes following treatment of complex tibial fractures with circular external fixation: a comparison between the Taylor Spatial Frame and TrueLok-Hex. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2019;14(3):142-147. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1443
41.
Ordas-BayonALoganKGargPPeatFKrkovicM.Ankle arthrodesis using the Taylor Spatial Frame for the treatment of infection, extruded talus and complex pilon fractures. Injury. 2021;52(4):1028-1037. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.003
42.
PaleyD.Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;250:81-104.
43.
PaleyDCatagniMAArgnaniFVillaABenedettiGBCattaneoR.Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunions with bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;241:146-165.
44.
PatelSBakerLPerezJVulcanoEKaplanJAiyerA.Risk factors for nonunion following tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;28(1):7-13. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2021.02.010
45.
PerlmanMHThordarsonDB.Ankle fusion in a high risk population: an assessment of nonunion risk factors. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20(8):491-496. doi:10.1177/107110079902000805
46.
RichterMAgrenPHBesseJL, et al. EFAS score - multilingual development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) by the score committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS). Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;24(3):185-204. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2018.05.004
47.
RickmanMKreibichDNSalehM.Fine wire frame arthrodesis for the salvage of severe ankle pathology. Injury. 2001;32(3):241-247. doi:10.1016/s0020-1383(00)00190-x
48.
RosteiusTLotzienSKonigshausenM, et al. Analysis of bone transport for ankle arthrodesis as a limb salvage procedure for the treatment of septic pilon fracture nonunion. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):24472. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-04187-7
49.
RosteiusTPatzholzSRauschV, et al. Ilizarov bone transport using an intramedullary cable transportation system in the treatment of tibial bone defects. Injury. 2021;52(6):1606-1613. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020.12.028
50.
RozisMBenetosIAfratiSRPolyzoisVDPneumaticosSG.Results and outcomes of combined cross screw and Ilizarov external fixator frame in ankle fusion. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;59(2):337-342. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2019.05.008
51.
SadekarVWattsATMoulderE, et al. Is a staged reloading protocol effective to time the removal of circular frames? a retrospective analysis. Bone Jt Open. 2022;3(5):359-366. doi:10.1302/2633-1462.35.BJO-2021-0179.R1
52.
SakurakichiKTsuchiyaHUeharaKKabataTYamashiroTTomitaK.Ankle arthrodesis combined with tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov apparatus. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8(1):20-25. doi:10.1007/s007760300003
53.
SalemKHKinzlLSchmelzA.Ankle arthrodesis using Ilizarov ring fixators: a review of 22 cases. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(10):764-770. doi:10.1177/107110070602701002
54.
SaltzmanCL.Salvage of diffuse ankle osteomyelitis by single-stage resection and circumferential frame compression arthrodesis. Iowa Orthop J. 2005;25:47-52.
55.
ShermanAEMehtaMPNayakR, et al. Biologic augmentation of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with allogeneic bone block is associated with high rates of fusion. Foot Ankle Int. 2022;43(3):353-362. doi:10.1177/10711007211041336
56.
ShibuyaNMcAlisterJEPrisselMA, et al. Consensus statement of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons: diagnosis and treatment of ankle arthritis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;59(5):1019-1031. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2019.10.007
57.
TellisiNFragomenATIlizarovSRozbruchSR.Limb salvage reconstruction of the ankle with fusion and simultaneous tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov/Taylor spatial frame. HSS J. 2008;4(1):32-42. doi:10.1007/s11420-007-9073-0
58.
ThiryayiWANaquiZKhanSA.Use of the Taylor spatial frame in compression arthrodesis of the ankle: a study of 10 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49(2):182-187. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2009.05.015
59.
TomczakCBeamanDPerkinsS.Combined intramedullary nail coated with antibiotic-containing cement and ring fixation for limb salvage in the severely deformed, infected, neuroarthropathic ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(1):48-55. doi:10.1177/1071100718800836
60.
YushanMAbulaitiAMaimaitiXHamitiYYusufuA.Tetrafocal (three osteotomies) and pentafocal (four osteotomies) bone transport using Ilizarov technique in the treatment of distal tibial defect-preliminary outcomes of 12 cases and a description of the surgical technique. Injury. 2022;53(8):2880-2887. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2022.06.006
61.
ZarutskyERushSMSchuberthJM.The use of circular wire external fixation in the treatment of salvage ankle arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;44(1):22-31. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2004.11.004
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
