Methods for Biomechanical Testing of Posterior Malleolar Fractures in Ankle Fractures: A Scoping Review

Abstract

Background:

The treatment of posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs) is debated, including the need for surgery and method of fixation. Recent literature has suggested that fracture pattern, rather than fragment size, may be an important predictor for ankle biomechanics and functional outcome. Biomechanical studies have been conducted to provide evidence-based treatment on the effects of fracture and fixation on contact pressure and stability. The objective of this scoping review is to summarize the methodologies used in biomechanical studies on PMFs and assess whether they are sufficient to test the need for surgery and method of fixation.

Methods:

A scoping review of publications before January 2022 was performed. PubMed/Medline and Embase Ovid were searched for cadaver or finite element analysis (FEA) studies that created and tested the effects of PMFs in ankle fractures. Both cadaver and FEA studies were included. Data about fragment characteristics, mode of testing, and outcomes were charted by 2 persons from the study group. The data were synthesized when possible and compared.

Results:

We included 25 biomechanical studies, including 19 cadaver studies, 5 FEA studies, and 1 cadaver and FEA study. Aside from the fragment size, few other fragment characteristics were reported. Mode of testing varied with different loads and foot positions. Strong conclusions on the effects of fracture and fixation on contact pressure and stability could not be made.

Conclusion:

Biomechanical studies on PMFs demonstrate wide variability in fragment characteristics and mode of testing, which makes it difficult to compare studies and draw conclusions on the need for surgery and method of fixation. Additionally, limited reporting of fragment measurements questions the applicability to clinical practice. The biomechanical literature on PMFs would benefit from the use of a standard classification and universal fragment measurements to match clinical injuries in future biomechanical studies. Based on this review, we recommend the Mason classification, which addresses the pathomechanism, and use of the following fragment measurements in all 3 anatomic planes when creating and describing PMFs: fragment length ratio, axial angle, sagittal angle or fragment height, and interfragmentary angle. The testing protocol needs to reflect the purpose of the study.

Clinical Relevance:

This scoping review demonstrates wide methodological diversity of biomechanical studies. Consistency in methodology should enable comparison of study results, leading to stronger evidence-based recommendations to guide surgeons in decision making and offer PMF patients the best treatment.