Enhanced recovery after surgery programs, also called fast-track protocols, were developed and successfully applied in the last decade for hip and knee reconstruction. Specific fast-track protocols have not yet been applied to ankle prostheses. The aim of the study was to develop and validate an enhanced recovery protocol for total ankle replacement (TAR) evaluating the clinical and radiographic results. We hypothesize that on the basis of well-defined pre- and postoperative characteristics, the current knowledge on ankle replacement, and referring to hip and knee reconstruction, it is possible to identify a "patient type" to be safely eligible to a Fast-Track Protocol with at least comparable results and without increasing the complications risk.
Methods:
We identified 8 predictive variables that might affect the outcome of TAR. Those variables were the body mass index, the state of anxiety or depression, the functional preoperative status, ankle equinus, the coronal malalignment, the surgical time, the surgical accessory procedures, and the bone quality. These characteristics were evaluated for each patient with almost validated outcome tools attributing a specific score. Based on the score obtained, the patients were divided into 2 groups: the Standard Protocol group (Control Group) and the Fast-Track Protocol group (Study Group). The main difference between treatment of the 2 groups relates to the use of postoperative plaster casts: in the Fast-Track group the cast was removed the first day after surgery and walking was allowed in sports shoes assisted with crutches, whereas in the Standard Protocol group, the cast was removed after 3 weeks. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed for all patients preoperatively and postoperatively every 6 months.
Results:
A total of 163 patients received a score between 1 and 5 and were included in the control group (Standard Protocol); 47 patients received a score of 0 and were allocated to the study group (Fast-Track Protocol). Clinically, except for the preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale score, no statistically significant differences were recorded in the multiple comparisons between the 2 groups. No significant differences were found regarding complications.
Conclusion:
In selected patients, it is possible to apply an enhanced recovery protocol of rehabilitation, focused on immediate weightbearing and mobilization without any plaster or boot.
BergUBüLowESundbergMRolfsonO.No increase in readmissions or adverse events after implementation of fast-track program in total hip and knee replacement at 8 Swedish hospitals: an observational before-and-after study of 14,148 total joint replacements 2011–2015. Acta Orthop. 2018;3674:1-6. doi:10.1080/17453674.2018.1492507
3.
BobynJDPoggieRAKrygierJJ, et al. Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86:123-129. doi:10.2106/00004623-200412002-00017
4.
BrigidoSAWobstGMGalliMMBleazeySTProtzmanNM.Evaluating component migration after modular stem fixed-bearing total ankle replacement. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(3):326-331. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2014.06.028
CodyEALachmanJRGausdenEBNunleyJAEasleyME.Lower bone density on preoperative computed tomography predicts periprosthetic fracture risk in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(1):1-8. doi:10.1177/1071100718799102
7.
D’ambrosiRdi SilvestriCManziLIndinoCMaccarioCUsuelliFG.Post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis: quality of life, frequency and associated factors. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2019;9(3):363-371. doi:10.32098/mltj.03.2019.10
8.
DebonoBWainwrightTWWangMY, et al. Consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar spinal fusion: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Spine J. 2021;21(5):729-752. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.001
9.
DeVriesJGDerksenTAScharerBMLimoniR.Perioperative complications and initial alignment of lateral approach total ankle arthroplasty. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56(5):996-1000. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2017.04.016
10.
EskiciogluCForbesSSAartsMAOkrainecAMcLeodRS.Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(12):2321-2329. doi:10.1007/s11605-009-0927-2
GlazebrookMAArsenaultKDunbarM.Evidence-based classification of complications in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(10):945-949. doi:10.3113/FAI.2009.0945
13.
GougouliasNKhannaAMaffulliN.How successful are current ankle replacements?: A systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):199-208. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0987-3
14.
HayashiKTanakaYKumaiTSugimotoKTakakuraY.Correlation of compensatory alignment of the subtalar joint to the progression of primary osteoarthritis of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(4):400-406. doi:10.3113/FAI.2008.0400
15.
HenricsonAPopelkaSRydholmU.Six year results of the Rebalance mobile bearing total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Surg. 2021;27(1):66-69. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2020.02.004
HintermannBValderrabanoVDereymaekerGDickW.The HINTEGRA ankle: rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:57-68. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000132462.72843.e8
18.
HirschmannMTKortNKopfSBeckerR.Fast track and outpatient surgery in total knee arthroplasty: beneficial for patients, doctors and hospitals. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(9):2657-2658. doi:10.1007/s00167-017-4660-1
19.
HolzerNSalvoDMarijnissenACA, et al. Radiographic evaluation of posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: the Kellgren-Lawrence scale is reliable and correlates with clinical symptoms. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23(3):363-369. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2014.11.010
20.
HuntKJHurwitD.Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(16):1-9. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.01476
21.
JenkinsonCLayteRJenkinsonD, et al. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies?J Public Health (Bangkok). 1997;19(2):179-186. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024606
22.
JohnsonCCGausdenEBWeilandAJLaneJMSchreiberJJ.Using Hounsfield units to assess osteoporotic status on wrist computed tomography scans: comparison with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Hand Surg. 2016;41(7):767-774. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.04.016
23.
KehletH.Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Lancet. 2013;381(9878):1600-1602. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61003-X
24.
KitaokaHBAlexanderIJAdelaarRSNunleyJAMyersonMSSandersM.Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(7):349-353. doi:10.1177/107110079401500701
25.
KrischakGDWachterNJZabelT, et al. Influence of preoperative mechanical bone quality and bone mineral density on aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty after seven years. Clin Biomech. 2003;18(10):916-923. doi:10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00175-X
26.
LeeKTLeeYKYoungKWKimJBSeoYS.Perioperative complications and learning curve of the Mobility Total Ankle System. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(2):210-214. doi:10.1177/1071100712467430
27.
LiMGNilssonKG.The effect of the preoperative bone quality on the fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15(6):744-753. doi:10.1054/arth.2000.6617
28.
LimYZWangYCicuttiniFM, et al. Obesity defined by body mass index and waist circumference and risk of total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):1-9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245002
29.
MaccarioCPaoliTRomanoFD’ambrosiRIndinoCUsuelliFG.Transfibular total ankle arthroplasty: a new reliable procedure at five-year follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2022;104(4):472-478. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.104B4
30.
MaccarioCTanEWdi SilvestriCAIndinoCKangHPUsuelliFG.Learning curve assessment for total ankle replacement using the transfibular approach. Foot Ankle Surg. 2021;27(2):129-137. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2020.03.005
31.
MathijssenNMCVerburgHvan LeeuwenCCGMolenaarTLHanninkG. Factors influencing length of hospital stay after primary total knee arthroplasty in a fast-track setting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(8):2692-2696. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3932-x
32.
McCormackHMde L. HorneDJSheatherS.Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988;18(4):1007-1019. doi:10.1017/S0033291700009934
33.
NaalFDImpellizzeriFMRippsteinPF.Which are the most frequently used outcome instruments in studies on total ankle arthroplasty?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(3):815-826. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1036-y
34.
NaranjeSLendwayLMehleSGioeTJ.Does operative time affect infection rate in primary total knee arthroplasty?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(1):64-69. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3628-4
35.
NarayananACaiAXiYMaaloufNMRubinCChhabraA.CT bone density analysis of low-impact proximal femur fractures using Hounsfield units. Clin Imaging. 2019;57:15-20. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.04.009
36.
OrtegaFBSuiXLavieCJBlairSN.Body mass index, the most widely used but also widely criticized index: would a criterion standard measure of total body fat be a better predictor of cardiovascular disease mortality?Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(4):443-455. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.01.008
37.
PetersenPBKehletHJørgensenCC, et al. Improvement in fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective multicentre study of 36,935 procedures from 2010 to 2017. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1-9. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77127-6
38.
PigaCMaccarioCD’AmbrosiRRomanoFUsuelliFG.Total ankle arthroplasty with valgus deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2021;42(7):867-876. doi:10.1177/1071100720985281
39.
PriceAJAlvandATroelsenA, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2018;392(10158):1672-1682. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32344-4
40.
PugelyAJLuXAmendolaACallaghanJJMartinCTCramP.Trends in the use of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis in the United States Medicare population. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(3):207-215. doi:10.1177/1071100713511606
41.
RocchiMStagniCGovoniM, et al. Comparison of a fast track protocol and standard care after hip arthroplasty in the reduction of the length of stay and the early weight-bearing resumption: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):348. doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05314-5
42.
SagherianBHClaridgeRJ.Salvage of failed total ankle replacement using tantalum trabecular metal: case series. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(3):318-324. doi:10.1177/1071100714556760
Sanchez-SantosMTGarrigaCJudgeA, et al. Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for patient-reported pain and function after primary total knee replacement surgery article. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1-9. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21714-1
45.
SansostiLEVanJCMeyrAJ.Effect of obesity on total ankle arthroplasty: a systematic review of postoperative complications requiring surgical revision. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;57(2):353-356. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2017.10.034
46.
SchenkKLieskeSJohnM, et al. Prospective study of a cementless, mobile-bearing, third generation total ankle prosthesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(8):755-763. doi:10.3113/FAI.2011.0755
47.
SchimmelJJPWalschotLHBLouwerensJWK. Comparison of the short-term results of the first and last 50 Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacements. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(4):326-333. doi:10.1177/1071100713518187
48.
SchipperONDenduluriSKZhouYHaddadSL.Effect of obesity on total ankle arthroplasty outcomes. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(1):1-7. doi:10.1177/1071100715604392
49.
SchuberthJMBabuNSRicheyJMChristensenJC.Gutter impingement after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(3):329-337. doi:10.1177/1071100712466850
50.
TanEWMaccarioCTalusanPGSchonLC.Early complications and secondary procedures in transfibular total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(8):835-841. doi:10.1177/1071100716644817
51.
TiusanenHKormiSKohonenISaltychevM.Results of trabecular-metal total ankle arthroplasties with transfibular approach. Foot Ankle Int. 2020;41(4):411-418. doi:10.1177/1071100719894929
52.
UsuelliFGdi SilvestriCAD’AmbrosiROrentiARandelliF.Total ankle replacement: is pre-operative varus deformity a predictor of poor survival rate and clinical and radiological outcomes?Int Orthop. 2019;43(1):243-249. doi:10.1007/s00264-018-4189-z
53.
UsuelliFGMaccarioCGranataFIndinoCVakhshoriVTanEW.Clinical and radiological outcomes of transfibular total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(1):24-33. doi:10.1177/1071100718798851
54.
UsuelliFGMaccarioCManziLTanEW.Posterior talar shifting in mobile-bearing total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(3):281-287. doi:10.1177/1071100715610426
55.
UsuelliFGMaccarioCPantaloneASerraNTanEW.Identifying the learning curve for total ankle replacement using a mobile bearing prosthesis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;23(2):76-83. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2016.02.007
56.
UsuelliFGManziLBrusaferriGNeherREGuelfiMMaccarioC.Sagittal tibiotalar translation and clinical outcomes in mobile and fixed-bearing total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;23(2):95-101. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2016.08.005
57.
ValderrabanoVHorisbergerMRussellIDougallHHintermannB.Etiology of ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(7):1800-1806. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0543-6
58.
VilagutGForeroCGPinto-MezaA, et al. The mental component of the Short-Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) as a measure of depressive disorders in the general population: Results with three alternative scoring methods. Value Health. 2013;16(4):564-573. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.006
59.
von ElmEAltmanDGEggerMPocockSJGøtzschePCVandenbrouckeJP.The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495-1499. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013
60.
WainwrightTWGillMMcDonaldDA, et al. Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Acta Orthop. 2020;91(1):3-19. doi:10.1080/17453674.2019.1683790
61.
WaltersMChambersMCSayeedZAnoushiravaniAAEl-OthmaniMMSalehKJ.Reducing length of stay in total joint arthroplasty care. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016;47(4):653-660. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2016.05.006
62.
WillsBWSheppardEDSmithWR, et al. Impact of operative time on early joint infection and deep vein thrombosis in primary total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104(4):445-448. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2018.02.008
63.
WoodPLRPremHSuttonC. Total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90-B(5):605-609. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.19677
64.
YangHYWangSHLeeKB.The HINTEGRA total ankle arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(6):695-701. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1578.R1
65.
ZaidiRMacgregorAJGoldbergA.Quality measures for total ankle replacement, 30-day readmission and reoperation rates within 1 year of surgery: a data linkage study using the NJR data set. BMJ Open. 2016;6(5). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011332
66.
ZhuSQianWJiangCYeCChenX.Enhanced recovery after surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Postgrad Med J. 2017;93(1106):736-742. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-134991
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
