Association of Normal vs Abnormal Meary Angle With Hindfoot Malalignment and First Metatarsal Rotation: A Short Report

Abstract

Background:

Recent work has reported a significant association between first metatarsal (M1) rotation and hindfoot alignment, with the finding of a moderate association between the calcaneal moment arm (CMA) and 2 M1 pronation angular measures: Saltzman (r = 0.641, P < .01) and Kim (r = 0.615, P < .01). The aim of the current post hoc investigation was to determine if this association is related with Meary angle.

Methods:

We reanalyzed previously published data set separating patients into 2 groups: (1) those with normal Meary angle (n = 128) and (2) those with abnormal Meary angle (n = 147). Hindfoot alignment and M1 rotation were measured on weightbearing computed tomography. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate for association between these variables among the groups.

Results:

The correlation between CMA and M1 rotation of the entire cohort was r = 0.577 (Saltzman ankle) and r = 0.540 (Kim angle). For the subset with a normal Meary angle, this association was negligible (Saltzman and Kim angles, r = 0.194 and 0.240, respectively). Conversely, for the abnormal Meary angle subset, the association was substantial (Saltzman and Kim angles, r = 0.733 and 0.675, respectively).

Conclusion:

Patients presenting with an abnormal Meary angle and hindfoot deformity have a high likelihood of manifesting a proportionate degree of M1 rotation.

Level of Evidence:

Level III, Retrospective Cohort Study.