Is There a Borderline Value in the Radiological Findings of Patients With Calcaneal Malunion That May Help to Select an Appropriate Treatment Option?

Abstract

Background:

Despite the constant evolution of technological support, operative techniques, and rehabilitation techniques after conservative treatment and operative treatment, a considerable number of patients with calcaneal fractures have constant pain, frequently resulting in loss of occupation. There are numerous options for the operative treatment of painful calcaneal malunion; however, very few publications suggest specific radiological measurements for pre- and postoperative planning—even fewer have statistically analyzed how these radiological measurements affect clinical outcomes.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective study of 100 patients after operative treatment of calcaneal malunion to determine the correlation between radiological measurements and clinical outcomes. Data were used to create an algorithm that would help to choose between in situ subtalar arthrodesis and complex reconstructive operations. The algorithm was then used to treat 27 prospective patients. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score and visual analog scale (VAS) were used for clinical assessment, whereas standard weightbearing anteroposterior (AP), lateral (LAT) ankle x-rays, and long axial hindfoot view were used for radiological assessment.

Results:

The talar declination angle was positively correlated with clinical outcome. Patients with talar declination angles less than 6.5 degrees showed worse results in AOFAS score than patients with a greater angle did (57.3 ± 15.3 and 81 ± 15.6, respectively).

Conclusion:

The combination of subtalar arthrodesis with distraction bone block or calcaneal osteotomy in patients with calcaneal malunion and a talar declination angle less than 6.5 degrees showed better results than isolated in situ arthrodesis.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study, case series.