We aimed to perform an economic analysis and compare the clinical outcomes between inpatient and short-stay designation total ankle replacement (TAR).
Methods:
We performed a retrospective study on 178 consecutive patients undergoing primary inpatient versus short-stay designation TAR during the 2016 and 2017 fiscal years. Patient demographics, concomitant procedures, perioperative complications, patient-reported outcomes, and perioperative costs were collected.
Results:
The mean age of our cohort was 62.5 ± 9.6 years (range, 30-88 years), with a significant difference in age (64.1 vs 58.5 years) (P = .005) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.3 ± 1.9 vs 2.3 ± 1.4; P = .002) for the inpatient and short-stay designation groups, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 29.6 ± 11.8 months (range, 12-52.3 months), there was no difference in complications between groups (P = .97). The inpatient designation TAR group had a worse baseline Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) function score (76.1; 95% CI, 70.5-81.6) than the short-stay designation TAR group (63.9; 95% CI, 52.5-75.3) while achieving similar final postoperative SMFA function scores for the inpatient (55.2; 95% CI, 51.1-59.2) and short-stay (56.2; 95% CI, 48.2-64.2) designation TAR groups (P > .05). However, the inpatient designation TAR group showed a significantly greater mean improvement in SMFA function score (20.9; 95% CI, 19.4-22.4) compared with the short-stay designation TAR group (7.7; 95% CI, 3.7-11.1) (P = .0442). The total direct cost was significantly higher for the inpatient designation group ($15 340) than the short-stay designation group ($13 002) (P < .001).
Conclusion:
While inpatient designation TARs were more comorbid, short-stay designation TARs were associated with a 15.5% reduction in perioperative costs, comparable complication rates, and similar final postoperative patient-reported outcome scores compared with inpatient TARs.
AdamsSBJrDemetracopoulosCAQueenRMEasleyMEDeOrioJKNunleyJA. Early to mid-term results of fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty with a modular intramedullary tibial component. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(23):1983-1989.
2.
BargABettinCCBursteinAHSaltzmanCLGilillandJ. Early clinical and radiographic outcomes of trabecular metal total ankle replacement using a transfibular approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(6):505-515.
3.
BorensteinTRAnandKLiQCharltonTPThordarsonDB. A review of perioperative complications of outpatient total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(2):143-148.
4.
BovonratwetPOndeckNTTyagiVNelsonSJRubinLEGrauerJN. Outpatient and inpatient unicompartmental knee arthroplasty procedures have similar short-term complication profiles. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(10):2935-2940.
5.
BovonratwetPWebbMLOndeckNT, et al. Definitional differences of ‘outpatient’ versus ‘inpatient’ THA and TKA can affect study outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(12):2917-2925.
6.
BozicKJGrossoLMLinZ, et al. Variation in hospital-level risk-standardized complication rates following elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(8):640-647.
7.
BrolinTJMulliganRPAzarFMThrockmortonTW. Neer Award 2016: outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty in an ambulatory surgery center is a safe alternative to inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty in a hospital: a matched cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(2):204-208.
8.
CharlsonMSzatrowskiTPPetersonJGoldJ. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245-1251.
9.
CunninghamDKarasVDeOrioJNunleyJEasleyMAdamsS. Patient risk factors do not impact 90-day readmission and emergency department visitation after total ankle arthroplasty: implications for the comprehensive care for joint replacement (CJR) bundled payment plan. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(15):1289-1297.
10.
CunninghamDKarasVDeOrioJKNunleyJAEasleyMEAdamsSB. Possible implications for bundled payment models of comorbidities and complications as drivers of cost in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(2):210-217.
11.
CunninghamDJDeOrioJKNunleyJAEasleyMEAdamsSB. The effect of patient characteristics on 1 to 2-year and minimum 5-year outcomes after total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(3):199-208.
12.
de GraafMWEl MoumniMHeinemanEWendtKWReiningaIH. Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment: normative data of the Dutch population. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(8):2015-2023.
13.
DeyoRACherkinDCCiolMA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613-619.
14.
ElixhauserASteinerCHarrisDRCoffeyRM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care1998;36(1):8-27.
15.
EscuderoMILeVBarahonaM, et al. Total ankle arthroplasty survival and risk factors for failure. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(9):997-1006.
16.
Federal Register. Rules and Regulations 52356-52367. Vol. 82, No. 217. Office of the Federal Register; November13, 2017.
17.
Federal Register. Rules and Regulations 61142-61492. Vol. 84, No. 218. Office of the Federal Register; November12, 2019.
18.
GonduskyJSChoiLKhalafNPatelJBarnettSGorabR. Day of surgery discharge after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an effective perioperative pathway. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(3):516-519.
19.
GonzalezTFiskEChiodoCSmithJBlumanEM. Economic analysis and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(5):507-513.
20.
GrossCELampleyAGreenCL, et al. The effect of obesity on functional outcomes and complications in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(2):137-141.
21.
HaasDAZhangXDavisCMIIIIorioRBarnesCL. The financial implications of the removal of total knee arthroplasty from the Medicare inpatient-only list. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(6S):S33-S36.
22.
HahnMEWrightESSegalADOrendurffMSLedouxWRSangeorzanBJ. Comparative gait analysis of ankle arthrodesis and arthroplasty: initial findings of a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(4):282-289.
23.
HamidKSNwachukwuBUEllisSJ. Competing in value-based health care: keys to winning the foot race. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(5):519-528.
24.
HofmannKJShabinZMFerkelEJockelJSlovenkaiMP. Salto talaris total ankle arthroplasty: clinical results at a mean of 5.2 years in 78 patients treated by a single surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(24):2036-2046.
25.
HuntKJHurwitD. Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(16):e118(1-9).
26.
HustedHHolmGJacobsenS. Predictors of length of stay and patient satisfaction after hip and knee replacement surgery: fast-track experience in 712 patients. Acta Orthop. 2008;79(2):168-173.
27.
KitaokaHBAlexanderIJAdelaarRSNunleyJAMyersonMSSandersM. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(7):349-353.
28.
LewisJSJrGreenCLAdamsSBJrEasleyMEDeOrioJKNunleyJA. Comparison of first- and second-generation fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty using a modular intramedullary tibial component. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(8):881-890.
29.
McHorneyCAWareJEJrLuJFSherbourneCD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care1994;32(1):40-66.
30.
MulliganRPParekhSG. Safety of outpatient total ankle arthroplasty vs traditional inpatient admission or overnight observation. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(8):825-831.
31.
NorvellDCLedouxWRShoferJB, et al. Effectiveness and safety of ankle arthrodesis versus arthroplasty: a prospective multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(16):1485-1494.
32.
NunleyJACaputoAMEasleyMECookC. Intermediate to long-term outcomes of the STAR Total Ankle Replacement: the patient perspective. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(1):43-48.
PedowitzDIKaneJMSmithGMSaffelHLComerCRaikinSM. Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis: a comparative analysis of arc of movement and functional outcomes. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-b(5):634-640.
35.
PennerMDavisWHWingKBemenderferTWalyFAndersonRB. The Infinity Total Ankle System: early clinical results with 2- to 4-year follow-up. Foot Ankle Spec. 2019;12(2):159-166.
36.
PorterMETeisbergEO. Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-Based Competition on Results. Business Review Press; 2006.
37.
PugelyAJLuXAmendolaACallaghanJJMartinCTCramP. Trends in the use of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis in the United States Medicare population. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(3):207-215.
38.
RaikinSMRasouliMREspandarRMaltenfortMG. Trends in treatment of advanced ankle arthropathy by total ankle replacement or ankle fusion. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(3):216-224.
39.
ReddySKoenigLDemiralpBNguyenJTZhangQ. Assessing the utilization of total ankle replacement in the United States. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(6):641-649.
40.
SaitoGHSandersAEde Cesar NettoCO’MalleyMJEllisSJDemetracopoulosCA. Short-term complications, reoperations, and radiographic outcomes of a new fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(7):787-794.
41.
SchipperONDenduluriSKZhouYHaddadSL. Effect of obesity on total ankle arthroplasty outcomes. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(1):1-7.
42.
SchipperONJiangJJChenLKohJToolanBC. Effect of diabetes mellitus on perioperative complications and hospital outcomes after ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(3):258-267.
43.
ScottJHuskissonEC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976;2(2):175-184.
44.
SegalADShoferJHahnMEOrendurffMSLedouxWRSangeorzanBJ. Functional limitations associated with end-stage ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(9):777-783.
45.
StamboughJBNunleyRMCurryMCSteger-MayKClohisyJC. Rapid recovery protocols for primary total hip arthroplasty can safely reduce length of stay without increasing readmissions. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(4):521-516.
46.
StevensKNNadarajahVJaureguiJJ, et al. Preoperative expectations of patients undergoing knee surgery. J Knee Surg. Published online October 22, 2019. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1698805
47.
StewartMGGreenCLAdamsSBJrDeOrioJKEasleyMENunleyJAII. Midterm results of the salto talaris total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(11):1215-1221.
48.
SwiontkowskiMFEngelbergRMartinDPAgelJ. Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(9):1245-1260.
49.
VakhshoriVSabourAFAlluriRKHatchGFIIITanEW. Patient and practice trends in total ankle replacement and tibiotalar arthrodesis in the United States from 2007 to 2013. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(2):e77-e84.
50.
von ElmEAltmanDGEggerMPocockSJGotzschePCVandenbrouckeJP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495-1499.
51.
WareJEJrSherbourneCD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-483.
52.
WernerBCBurrusMTLooneyAMParkJSPerumalVCooperMT. Obesity is associated with increased complications after operative management of end-stage ankle arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(8):863-870.
53.
YatesAJKerrJMFroimsonMIDella ValleCJHuddlestonJI. The unintended impact of the removal of total knee arthroplasty from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient-only list. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(12):3602-3606.
54.
YoungerASWingKJGlazebrookM, et al. Patient expectation and satisfaction as measures of operative outcome in end-stage ankle arthritis: a prospective cohort study of total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(2):123-134.
55.
ZengCMelbergMWTavelHM, et al. Development and validation of a model for predicting rehabilitation care location among patients discharged home after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(7):1840-1846.e2.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
