Three-Dimensional Biometric Weightbearing CT Evaluation of the Operative Treatment of Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Abstract

Background:

Assessment of operative correction of adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) has been traditionally performed by clinical evaluation and conventional radiographic imaging. Previously, a 3-dimensional biometric weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) tool, the foot ankle offset (FAO), has been developed and validated in assessing hindfoot alignment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of FAO in evaluating operative deformity correction in AAFD.

Methods:

In this prospective comparative study, 19 adult patients (20 feet) with stage II (flexible) flatfoot deformity underwent preoperative and postoperative standing WBCT examination at mean 19 months (range, 6-24) after surgery. Three-dimensional coordinates of the foot tripod and center of the ankle joint were acquired by 2 independent and blinded observers. These coordinates were used to calculate the FAO using dedicated software, and subsequently compared pre- and postoperatively. The FAO is a previously validated biometric measurement that represents centering of the foot tripod as well as hindfoot alignment, with a normal mean FAO of 2.3% ± 2.9%. In addition, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) clinical outcomes scores were compared pre- and postoperatively with a mean follow-up of 22.6 months (range, 14-37).

Results:

There was significant correction of flatfoot deformity from a mean preoperative FAO of 9.8% to a mean postoperative value of 1.3% (P < .001). Additionally, there was statistically significant improvement in all PROMIS domains (P < .05), except depression, at an average follow-up of 22.6 months. Spring ligament reconstruction was the only procedure associated with a significant correction in FAO (P = .0064).

Conclusion:

The FAO was a reliable and sensitive tool that was used to evaluate preoperative deformity as well as postoperative correction, with patients demonstrating both significant improvement in FAO as well as patient-reported outcomes. These findings demonstrate the role for biometric 3-dimensional WBCT imaging in assessing operative correction after flatfoot reconstruction, as well as the potential role for operative planning to address preoperative deformity.

Level of Evidence:

Level II, prospective comparative study.

Keywords

flatfoot deformity correction weightbearing CT WBCT foot ankle offset FAO spring ligament

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barg

Amendola

Henninger

Kapron

Saltzman

Anderson

AE.

Influence of ankle position and radiographic projection angle on measurement of supramalleolar alignment on the anteroposterior and hindfoot alignment views. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(11):1352-1361.

Bastias

Dalmau-Pastor

Astudillo

Pellegrini

MJ.

Spring ligament instability. Foot Ankle Clin. 2018;23(4):659-678.

Baverel

Brilhault

Odri

Boissard

Lintz

Influence of lower limb rotation on hindfoot alignment using a conventional two-dimensional radiographic technique. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;23(1):44-49.

Castaneda

Thordarson

Charlton

. Radiographic assessment of medial cuneiform opening wedge osteotomy for flatfoot correction. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(6):498-500. doi:10.3113/FAI.2012.0498

Chadha

Pomeroy

Manoli

Radiologic signs of unilateral pes planus. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18(9):603-604.

Chan

Greenfield

Soukup

Deland

Ellis

SJ.

Contribution of lateral column lengthening to correction of forefoot abduction in stage IIb adult acquired flatfoot deformity reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(12):1400-1411.

Chan

Williams

Nair

, et al. The contribution of medializing calcaneal osteotomy on hindfoot alignment in the reconstruction of the stage II adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(2):159-166.

Conti

Chan

Ellis

Deland

JT.

Correlation of postoperative midfoot position with outcome following reconstruction of the stage II adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(3):239-247.

Conti

Deland

Ellis

SJ.

Stage IIB flatfoot reconstruction using literature-based equations for heel slide and lateral column lengthening. Techn Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;16(4):153-166.

10.

Conti

Ellis

Chan

Deland

. Optimal Position of the Heel Following Reconstruction of the Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(8):919-927. doi:10.1177/1071100715576918

11.

Dagneaux

Moroney

Maestro

Reliability of hindfoot alignment measurements from standard radiographs using the methods of Meary and Saltzman. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25(2):237-241.

12.

de Cesar Netto

Bernasconi

Roberts

, et al. Foot alignment in symptomatic national basketball association players using weightbearing cone beam computed tomography. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7(2):2325967119826081.

13.

de Cesar Netto

Schon

Thawait

, et al. Flexible adult acquired flatfoot deformity: comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing measurements using cone-beam computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg. 2017;99(18):e98.

14.

de Cesar Netto

Shakoor

Roberts

, et al. Hindfoot alignment of adult acquired flatfoot deformity: a comparison of clinical assessment and weightbearing cone beam CT examinations. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25(6):790-797.

15.

Deland

JT.

Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(7):399-406.

16.

Deland

de Asla

Sung

Ernberg

Potter

HG.

Posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: which ligaments are involved?

Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(6):427-435.

17.

Ellis

Joseph

Johnson

Elliott

O’Malley

Deland

Plantar pressures in patients with and without lateral foot pain after lateral column lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg. 2010;92(1):81-91.

18.

Ellis

Williams

Joseph

Deland

JT.

Spring ligament reconstruction for advanced flatfoot deformity with the use of an Achilles allograft. Oper Tech Orthop. 2010;20(3):175-182.

19.

Ellis

Williams

Wagshul

Pavlov

Deland

JT.

Deltoid ligament reconstruction with peroneus longus autograft in flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(9):781-789.

20.

Ferri

Scharfenberger

Goplen

Daniels

Pearce

Weightbearing CT scan of severe flexible pes planus deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(2):199-204.

21.

Gazdag

Cracchiolo

III . Rupture of the posterior tibial tendon. evaluation of injury of the spring ligament and clinical assessment of tendon transfer and ligament repair. J Bone Joint Surg. 1997;79(5):675-681.

22.

Henry

Shakked

Ellis

SJ.

Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2019;4(1):2473011418820847.

23.

Holmes

Mann

RA.

Possible epidemiological factors associated with rupture of the posterior tibial tendon. Foot Ankle Int. 1992;13(2):70-79.

24.

Johnson

KA.

Tibialis posterior tendon rupture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;177:140-147.

25.

Kohls-Gatzoulis

Woods

Angel

Singh

The prevalence of symptomatic posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction in women over the age of 40 in England. Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;15(2):75-81.

26.

Kunas

Aiyer

Deland

Ellis

SJ.

Contribution of medial cuneiform osteotomy to correction of longitudinal arch collapse in stage IIb adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(8):885-893.

27.

Lintz

Welck

Bernasconi

, et al. 3D biometrics for hindfoot alignment using weightbearing CT. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(6):684-689.

28.

Mann

Thompson

FM.

Rupture of the posterior tibial tendon causing flat foot. surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(4):556-561.

29.

Mosier

Pomeroy

Manoli

2nd . Pathoanatomy and etiology of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;365:12-22.

30.

Myerson

MS.

Adult acquired flatfoot deformity: Treatment of dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon. Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:393-405.

31.

Imhauser

Choi

Williams

Ellis

Deland

Sensitivity of plantar pressure and talonavicular alignment to lateral column lengthening in flatfoot reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg. 2013;95(12):1094-1100.

32.

Perry

Mont

Einhorn

Waller

JD.

The validity of measurements made on standard foot orthoroentgenograms. Foot Ankle. 1992;13(9):502-507.

33.

Richter

Zech

Hahn

PedCAT for radiographic 3D-imaging in standing position. Fuß Sprunggelenk. 2015;13(2):85-102.

34.

Saltzman

Brandser

Berbaum

, et al. Reliability of standard foot radiographic measurements. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(12):661-665.

35.

Saltzman

El-Khoury

GY.

The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16(9):572-576.

36.

Steginsky

Vora

What to do with the spring ligament. Foot Ankle Clin. 2017;22(3):515-527.

37.

Vulcano

Deland

Ellis

SJ.

Approach and treatment of the adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013;6(4):294-303.

38.

Williamson

Chan

Burket

Deland

Ellis

SJ.

New radiographic parameter assessing hindfoot alignment in stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(4):417-423.

39.

Younger

Sawatzky

Dryden

Radiographic assessment of adult flatfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(10):820-825.

40.

Zhang

Lintz

Bernasconi

, Weight Bearing CT Inter-national Study Group, Zhang S. 3D biometrics for hindfoot alignment using weightbearing computed tomography. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(6):720-726.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.30 MB