Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a popular method to assess pain. Recently, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has been suggested to be more accurate in measuring pain. This study aimed to compare NPRS and PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) scores in a population of foot and ankle patients to determine which method demonstrated a stronger correlation with preoperative and postoperative function, as measured by PROMIS Physical Function (PF).

Methods:

Prospective PROMIS PF and PI and NPRS data were obtained for 8 common elective foot and ankle surgical procedures. Data were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at a follow-up visit at least 6 months after surgery. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the relationship among NPRS (0-10) and PROMIS domains (PI, PF) pre- and postoperatively. A total of 500 patients fit our inclusion criteria.

Results:

PROMIS PF demonstrated a stronger correlation to PROMIS PI in both the pre- and postoperative settings (preoperative: ρ = −0.66; postoperative: ρ = −0.69) compared with the NPRS (preoperative: ρ = −0.32; postoperative:ρ = −0.33). Similar results were found when data were grouped by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code.

Conclusion:

PROMIS PI was a superior tool to gauge a patient’s preoperative level of pain and functional ability. This information may assist surgeons and patients in setting postoperative functional expectations and pain management.

Level of Evidence:

Level II, prognostic.

Keywords

patient-reported outcomes PROMIS pain surgical expectations value-based healthcare

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Houck

Saltzman

et al . Validation and generalizability of preoperative PROMIS scores to predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(7):763-770.

Baumhauer

JF.

Patient-reported outcomes—are they living up to their potential?

N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):6-9.

Cella

Yount

Rothrock

et al . The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S3-S11.

Houck

Flemister

et al . Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(9):911-918.

Hung

Baumhauer

Brodsky

et al . Psychometric comparison of the PROMIS Physical Function CAT with the FAAM and FFI for measuring patient-reported outcomes. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(6):592-599.

Hung

Baumhauer

Latt

Saltzman

SooHoo

Hunt

KJ.

Validation of PROMIS (R) Physical Function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(11):3466-3474.

Hung

Franklin

Hon

Cheng

Conrad

Saltzman

CL.

Time for a paradigm shift with computerized adaptive testing of general Physical Function outcomes measurements. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(1):1-7.

Hunt

Alexander

Baumhauer

et al . The Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Outcomes Research (OFAR) network: feasibility of a multicenter network for patient outcomes assessment in foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(9):847-854.

Kazmers

Hung

Rane

Bounsanga

Weng

Tyser

AR.

Association of Physical Function, Anxiety, and Pain Interference in nonshoulder upper extremity patients using the PROMIS platform. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(10):781-787.

10.

Kendall

Wagner

Brodke

et al . The relationship of PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function scales [published online December 7, 2017]. Pain Med. doi:10.1093/pm/pnx310.

11.

Nixon

McCormick

Johnson

Klein

SE.

PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function scores correlate with the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in patients with hallux valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(11):2775-2780.

12.

Overbeek

Nota

Jayakumar

Hageman

Ring

The PROMIS Physical Function correlates with the QuickDASH in patients with upper extremity illness. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(1):311-317.

13.

Papuga

Dasilva

McIntyre

Mitten

Kates

Baumhauer

. Large-scale clinical implementation of PROMIS computer adaptive testing with direct incorporation into the electronic medical record. Health Syst. 2017:1-12.

14.

Porter

ME.

A strategy for health care reform—toward a value-based system. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(2):109-112.

15.

Reed

Van Nostran

Assessing pain intensity with the visual analog scale: a plea for uniformity. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54(3):241-244.

16.

Saad

Kassam

Suriani

Jr Pan

Blaine

Kovacevic

. Performance of PROMIS Global-10 compared with legacy instruments in patients with shoulder arthritis [published online July 20, 2018]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.006.

17.

Yaffe

Goyal

Kokmeyer

Merrell

GA.

The use of an iPad to collect patient-reported functional outcome measures in hand surgery. Hand (N Y). 2015;10(3):522-528.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.31 MB

PROMIS Pain Interference Is Superior vs Numeric Pain Rating Scale for Pain Assessment in Foot and Ankle Patients

Abstract

Background:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Level of Evidence:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material