Abstract
Background:
Limited data are available comparing the results of lateral sesamoidectomy and medial sesamoidectomy for the treatment of fractures recalcitrant to nonoperative treatment interventions. The hypothesis of this study was that sesamoidectomy for either lateral or medial sesamoid fractures would not change radiographic alignment of the first ray given the use of identical reconstruction of the plantar plate, intersesamoid ligament, and plantar ligament complex at the time of surgery.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study compared the outcomes of 46 consecutive patients treated with sesamoidectomy (24 lateral, 22 medial). Patient demographics, mechanisms of injury, and outcomes were recorded. Preoperative, postoperative, and changes in both hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) were measured.
Results:
No statistically significant difference could be detected for age (
Conclusion:
Although statistically significant changes in both HVA and IMA were detected, these values were too small to be considered clinically significant. Patient outcomes did not differ between the 2 groups, and sesamoidectomy was used with low patient morbidity for both medial and lateral sesamoid fractures that failed to respond to nonoperative modalities. These data suggest that the underlying mechanics of the foot may be different in patients who sustain medial and lateral sesamoid stress injury, suggesting a possible etiologic difference between medial and lateral sesamoid injuries.
Level of Evidence:
Level III, retrospective cohort study
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
