Supramalleolar Osteotomy for Tibial Component Malposition in Total Ankle Replacement

Abstract

Background:

Persistent pain despite a total ankle replacement is not uncommon. A main source of pain may be an insufficiently balanced ankle. An alternative to the revision of the existing arthroplasty is the use of a corrective osteotomy of the distal tibia, above the stable implant. This strictly extraarticular procedure preserves the integrity of the replaced joint. The aim of this study was to review a series of patients in whom a corrective supramalleolar osteotomy was performed to realign a varus misaligned tibial component in total ankle replacement. We hypothesized that the supramalleolar osteotomy would correct the malpositioned tibial component, resulting in pain relief and improvement of function.

Methods:

Twenty-two patients (9 male, 13 female; mean age, 62.6 years; range, 44.7-80) were treated with a supramalleolar osteotomy to correct a painful ankle with a varus malpositioned tibial component. Prospectively recorded radiologic and clinical outcome data as well as complications and reoperations were analyzed.

Results:

The tibial anterior surface angle significantly changed from 85.2 ± 2.5 degrees preoperatively to 91.4 ± 2.9 degrees postoperatively (P < .0001), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society hindfoot score significantly increased from 46 ± 14 to 66 ± 16 points (P < .0001) and the patient’s pain score measured with the visual analog scale significantly decreased from 5.8 ± 1.9 to 3.3 ± 2.4 (P < .001). No statistical difference was found in the tibial lateral surface angle and the range of motion of the ankle when comparing the preoperative to the postoperative measurements. The osteotomy healed in all but 3 patients on first attempt. Fifteen patients (68%) were (very) satisfied, 4 moderately satisfied, and 3 patients were not satisfied with the result.

Conclusion:

The supramalleolar osteotomy was found to be a reliable treatment option for correcting the varus misaligned tibial component in a painful replaced ankle. However, nonunion (14%) should be mentioned as a possible complication of this surgery. Nonetheless, as a strictly extraarticular procedure, it did not compromise function of the previously replaced ankle, and it was shown to relieve pain without having to have revised a well-fixed ankle arthroplasty.

Level of evidence:

Level IV, case series.

Keywords

supramalleolar osteotomy total ankle replacement (TAR)varus tibial component tibial anterior surface angle (TAS)pain

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barg

Elsner

Anderson

Hintermann

The effect of three-component total ankle replacement malalignment on clinical outcome: pain relief and functional outcome in 317 consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(21):1969-1978.

Doets

Zurcher

AW.

Salvage arthrodesis for failed total ankle arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(1):142-147.

Ellington

Gupta

Myerson

MS.

Management of failures of total ankle replacement with the agility total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(23):2112-2118.

Espinosa

Walti

Favre

Snedeker

JG.

Misalignment of total ankle components can induce high joint contact pressures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(5):1179-1187.

Fukuda

Haddad

Ren

Zhang

LQ.

Impact of talar component rotation on contact pressure after total ankle arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(5):404-411.

Gallagher

Liebman

Bijur

PE.

Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(6):633-638.

Gougoulias

Khanna

Maffulli

How successful are current ankle replacements? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):199-208.

Hintermann

Barg

Knupp

Corrective supramalleolar osteotomy for malunited pronation-external rotation fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(10):1367-1372.

Hintermann

Barg

Knupp

Revision arthroplasty of the ankle joint [in German]. Orthopade. 2011;40(11):1000-1007.

10.

Ishikawa

Murphy

Richardson

EG.

The effect of cigarette smoking on hindfoot fusions. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23(11):996-998.

11.

Kamrad

Henricson

Magnusson

Carlsson

Rosengren

BE.

Outcome after salvage arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(3):255-261.

12.

Kelly

A-M.

Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain?

Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5(11):1086-1090.

13.

Kessler

Sendi

Graber

et al

Risk factors for periprosthetic ankle joint infection: a case-control study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(20):1871-1876.

14.

Knupp

Stufkens

Pagenstert

Hintermann

Valderrabano

Supramalleolar osteotomy for tibiotalar varus malalignment. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;8(1):17-23.

15.

Lindsjo

Danckwardt-Lilliestrom

Sahlstedt

Measurement of the motion range in the loaded ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;199:68-71.

16.

Pagenstert

Hintermann

Barg

Leumann

Valderrabano

Realignment surgery as alternative treatment of varus and valgus ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;462(462):156-168.

17.

Saltzman

Tochigi

Rudert

McIff

Brown

TD.

The effect of agility ankle prosthesis misalignment on the peri-ankle ligaments. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:137-142.

18.

Stamatis

Cooper

Myerson

MS.

Supramalleolar osteotomy for the treatment of distal tibial angular deformities and arthritis of the ankle joint. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(10):754-764.

19.

Stufkens

Barg

Bolliger

et al

Measurement of the medial distal tibial angle. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(3):288-293.

20.

Todd

Funk

Bonacci

Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27(4):485-489.

21.

Williams

Wegner

Sangeorzan

Brage

ME.

Intraoperative and perioperative complications during revision arthroplasty for salvage of a failed total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(2):135-142.