Developing Performance and Assessment Platforms in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrawis

Chenok

Bozic

. Health policy implications of outcomes measurement in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(11):3475-3481. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3014-7.

Andresen

Gravitt

Aydelotte

Podgorski

. Limitations of the SF-36 in a sample of nursing home residents. Age Ageing. 1999;28(6):562-566. doi:10.1093/ageing/28.6.562.

Baumhauer

Nawoczenski

DiGiovanni

Wilding

. Reliability and validity of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Clinical Rating Scale: a pilot study for the hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(12):1014-1019.

Brown

Holmes

Shah

Hall

Lazarus

Platt

. Distributed health data networks: a practical and preferred approach to multi-institutional evaluations of comparative effectiveness, safety, and quality of care. Med Care. 2010;48(6 suppl):S45-S51. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d9919f.

Button

Pinney

. A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system? Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(8):521-525.

Chen

Lyman

. Validation of Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(12):1145-1155. doi:10.3113/FAI.2012.1145.

Chun

Bafford

. History and background of quality measurement. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014;27(1):5-9. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1366912.

Donabedian

. The end results of health care: Ernest Codman’s contribution to quality assessment and beyond. Milbank Q. 1989;67:233-256, discussion 257-267.

. Orthopaedic Registries Update. AAOS Now. September 2015:1-3.

10.

Glazebrook

Daniels

Younger

. Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with end-stage ankle and hip arthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(3):499-505. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.01299.

11.

Hailer

. Orthopedic registry research—limitations and future perspectives. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(1):1-2. doi:10.3109/17453674.2014.1002183.

12.

Henricson

Carlsson

. Survival analysis of the single- and double-coated STAR ankle up to 20 years: long-term follow-up of 324 cases from the Swedish Ankle Registry. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(10):1156-1160. doi:10.1177/1071100715579863.

13.

Holmes

Elliott

Brown

. Clinical research data warehouse governance for distributed research networks in the USA: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(4):730-736. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002370.

14.

Hung

Baumhauer

Latt

. Validation of PROMIS® Physical Function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(11):3466-3474. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3097-1.

15.

Hunt

Hurwit

. Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research. J Bone Joint Surg. 2013;95(16):e1181-e1189. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.01476.

16.

Inacio

MCS

Paxton

Dillon

. Understanding orthopaedic registry studies: a comparison with clinical studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(1):e3. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.01332.

17.

Kaplan

Porter

. How to solve the cost crisis in health care. Harv Bus Rev. 2011;89(9):46-52, 54, 56-61 passim.

18.

Kofoed

. Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:73-79. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000132414.41124.06.

19.

Krousel-Wood

. Practical considerations in the measurement of outcomes in healthcare. Ochsner J. 1999;1(4):187-194.

20.

Madeley

Wing

Topliss

Penner

Glazebrook

Younger

. Responsiveness and Validity of the SF-36, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Score, and Foot Function Index in End Stage Ankle Arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(1):57-63. doi:10.3113/FAI.2012.0057.

21.

Malchau

Herberts

Eisler

Garellick

Söderman

. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84-A(suppl 2):2-20.

22.

Malviya

Makwana

Laing

. Correlation of the AOFAS scores with a generic health quality score in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(4):494-498. doi:10.3113/FAI.2007.0494.

23.

Mani

Vulcano

Hogan

. Evaluation of the foot and ankle outcome score in patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(5):662-667. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.97B5.

24.

Mann

Horton

. STAR™ ankle: long-term results. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(5):473-484. doi:10.3113/FAI.2011.0473.

25.

Marjoua

Bozic

. Brief history of quality movement in US healthcare. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012;5(4):265-273. doi:10.1007/s12178-012-9137-8.

26.

Maro

Platt

Holmes

. Design of a national distributed health data network. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(5):341-344.

27.

McLeod

Coon

Martin

Fehnel

Hays

. Interpreting patient-reported outcome results: US FDA guidance and emerging methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;11(2):163-169. doi:10.1586/erp.11.12.

28.

Nunley

Caputo

Easley

Cook

. Intermediate to long-term outcomes of the STAR total ankle replacement: the patient perspective. J Bone Joint Surg. 2012;94(1):1-6. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.01613.

29.

Nwachukwu

Hamid

Bozic

. Measuring value in orthopaedic surgery. JBJS Rev. 2013;1(1):e2. doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.M.00067.

30.

Pinsker

Daniels

. AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS clinical rating systems. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(9):841-842. doi:10.3113/FAI.2011.0841.

31.

Porter

. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2477-2481. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1011024.

32.

Prieto

Sacristán

. Health and quality of life outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1(1):80-88. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-1-80.

33.

Pugely

Martin

Harwood

Ong

Bozic

Callaghan

. Database and registry research in orthopaedic surgery: part I: claims-based data. J Bone Joint Surg. 2015;97(15):1278-1287. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.01260.

34.

Pugely

Martin

Harwood

Ong

Bozic

Callaghan

. Database and registry research in orthopaedic surgery: part 2: clinical registry data. J Bone Joint Surg. 2015;97(21):1799-1808. doi:10.2106/JBJS.O.00134.

35.

Roos

Brandsson

Karlsson

. Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22(10):788-794.

36.

Rosenbaum

. Data governance and stewardship: designing data stewardship entities and advancing data access. Health Serv Res. 2010;45(5 Pt 2):1442-1455. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01140.x.

37.

Russell

Rollins

Barnhart

. Charge awareness affects treatment choice. Ann Surg. 2015;262(1):189-193. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000885.

38.

Saleh

Bershadsky

Cheng

Kane

. Lessons learned from the hip and knee musculoskeletal outcomes data evaluation and management system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:272-278. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000137589.23853.61.

39.

Sanders

Newton

Browne

Katz

Birch

Herring

. Bracing for idiopathic scoliosis: How many patients require treatment to prevent one surgery? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(8):649-653. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.00290.

40.

Schilling

Bozic

. Development and validation of perioperative risk-adjustment models for hip fracture repair, total hip arthroplasty, and total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2016;98(1):e2. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.01330.

41.

Singh

Ahn

. Impact of economic incentives on patient selection of surgical facility: Commentary on an article by James C. Robinson, PhD, et al.: “Consumer Choice Between Hospital-Based and Freestanding Facilities for Arthroscopy. Impact on Prices, Spending, and Surgical Complications.” J Bone Joint Surg. 2015;97(18):e63. doi:10.2106/JBJS.O.00575.

42.

Vavken

Ganal-Antonio

Quidde

Shen

Chapman

Samartzis

. Fundamentals of clinical outcomes assessment for spinal disorders: clinical outcome instruments and applications. Global Spine J. 2015;5(4):329-338. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1396046.

43.

Weinstein

Lurie

Tosteson

. Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(6):1295-1304. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00913.