Wear debris of polyethylene within joint replacement systems can result in clinical complications including osteolysis and component loosening. Highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXPE) was introduced to improve these outcomes, and has been shown to result in improved wear performance in several joint replacement systems. However, bearing couples within total ankle replacement (TAR) systems have historically used conventional polyethylene (CPE) articulating on metal. The extent to which HXPE would result in a reduction of polyethylene wear compared to CPE in the ankle has not been studied. The hypothesis motivating this study was that use of HXPE within TAR will result in significantly lower wear rate than CPE.
Methods:
HXPE and CPE inserts within a semiconstrained, bicondylar TAR system were manufactured for this study. Samples were subjected to 5.0 million cycles of wear on an in vitro wear simulator. Testing was performed within a physiological environment, using kinematic and kinetic loading profiles characteristic of walking gait. Samples were weighed at regular intervals to determine gravimetric mass loss, and the morphology of wear particles was analyzed.
Results:
The wear rates for CPE and HXPE samples were 7.4 ± 1.3 and 1.9 ± 0.3 mg/Mc (mean ± SD), respectively. HXPE samples exhibited a significant (P < .01) wear rate reduction of 74% when compared with the CPE. Debris morphology trends between HXPE and CPE were consistent with what has been observed in other joint systems.
Conclusion:
Use of HXPE significantly reduces wear of TAR as compared to CPE, based on in vitro wear testing.
Clinical Relevance:
Highly crosslinked polyethylene may reduce clinical complications of total ankle replacement that are linked to polyethylene wear.
AffatatoSLeardiniALeardiniWGianniniSVicecontiM. Meniscal wear at a three-component total ankle prosthesis by a knee joint simulator. J Biomech. 2007;40:1871-1876.
2.
AffatatoSTaddeiPLeardiniAGianniniSSpinelliMVicecontiM. Wear behavior in total ankle replacement: a comparison between an in vitro simulation and retrieved prostheses. Clin Biomech. 2009;24:661-669.
3.
ASTM Standard F1877-05. Standard Practice for Characterization of Particles. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2005. doi:10.1520/F1877-05R10.
4.
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Demographics and Outcome of Ankle Arthroplasty 2013. Adelaide: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry; 2013.
5.
BakerDABellareAPruittL. The effects of degree of crosslinking on the fatigue crack initiation and propagation resistance of orthopedic-grade polyethylene. J Biomed Mat Res Part A. 2003;66A:146-154.
6.
BellCJFisherJ. Simulation of polyethylene wear in ankle joint prostheses. J Biomed Mat Res Part B: Appl Biomat. 2007;81B:162-167.
7.
BonninMJudetTColombierJABuscayretFGraveleauNPiriouP. Midterm results of the salto total ankle prosthesis. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2004;242:6-18.
8.
BragdonCRGreeneMEEkeledoAM, et al. Seven to ten year follow-up of highly cross-linked polyethylene liners in total hip arthroplasty. Paper presented at: Orthopaedic Research Society; February 2009; Las Vegas, NV.
9.
CalderalePMGarroABarbieroRFasolioGPipinoF. Biomechanical design of the total ankle prosthesis. Med Eng Phys. 1983;12(2):68-80.
10.
DanielsTRYoungerASEPennerM. Intermediate-term results of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis: a COFAS multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2014;96:135-142.
11.
DeOrioJKEasleyME. Total ankle arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:383-413.
12.
EnghCAStepniewskiASGinnSD. A randomized prospective evaluation of outcomes after total hip arthroplasty using cross-linked marathon and non-cross-linked enduron polyethylene liners. J Arthrop. 2006;21(6)-S2:17-25.
13.
FisherJMcEwenHMJTipperJL. Wear, debris, and biologic activity of cross-linked polyethylene in the knee: benefits and potential concerns. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2004;428:114-119.
14.
García-ReyEGarcía-CimbreloECruz-PardosAOrtega-ChamarroJ. New polyethylenes in total hip replacement: a prospective, comparative clinical study of two types of liner. Bone Joint J. 2008;90-B(2):149-153.
15.
HelmRStevensJ. Long-term results of total ankle replacement. J Arthrop. 1986;1(4):271-277.
16.
HenricsonASkoogACarlssonA. The Swedish Ankle Arthroplasty Register: an analysis of 531 arthroplasties between 1993 and 2005. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(5):569-574.
17.
HodrickJTSeversonEPMcAlisterDSDahlBHofmannAA. Highly crosslinked polyethylene is safe for use in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2008;466:2806-2812. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0472-4.
18.
HosmanAHMasonRBHobbsTRothwellAG. A New Zealand national joint registry review of 202 total ankle replacements followed for up to 6 years. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(5):584-591.
19.
IllgenRLIIForsytheTMPikeJWLaurentMPBlanchardCR. Highly crosslinked vs conventional polyethylene particles—an in vitro comparison of biologic activities. J Arthrop. 2008;23(5):721-731.
20.
InacioMCSCafriGPaxtonEWKurtzSMNambaRS. Alternative bearings in total knee arthroplasty: risk of early revision compared to traditional bearings. Acta Orthop. 2013;84(2);145-152. doi:10.3109/17453674.2013.784660.
21.
JacobsCAChristensenCPGreenwaldASMcKellopH. Clinical performance of highly cross-linked polyethylenes in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89(12):2779-2786.
22.
JohnsonTSLaurentMPYaoJQGilbertsonLN. The effect of displacement control input parameters on tibiofemoral prosthetic knee wear. Wear. 2001;250:222-226.
23.
KnechtSIEstinMCallaghanJJ. The Agility total ankle arthroplasty: seven to sixteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86-A(6):1161-1171.
24.
KurtzSMedelFJManleyM. Wear in highly crosslinked polyethylenes. Current Orthop. 2008;22(6):392-399.
KurtzSMGawelHAPatelJD. History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2262-2277.
27.
LachiewiczPF. Total ankle arthroplasty: Indications, techniques and results. Orthop Rev. 1994:315-320.
28.
LamoreuxLW. Kinematic measurements in the study of human walking. Bull Pros Res. 1971;10:3-84.
29.
LaurentMPJohnsonTSCrowninshieldRDBlanchardCRBhambriSKYaoJQ. Characterization of a highly cross-linked ultrahigh molecular-weight polyethylene in clinical use in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthrop. 2008;23(5):751-761.
30.
ManningDWChiangPPMartellJMGalanteJOHarrisWH. In vivo comparative wear study of traditional and highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthrop. 2005;20(7):880-886.
31.
MinodaYAiharaMSakawaA. Comparison between highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2009;16;348-351.
32.
MuratogluOKBragdonCRJastyMO’ConnorDOVon KnochRSHarrisWH. Knee-simulator testing of conventional and cross-linked polyethylene tibial inserts. J Arthrop. 2004;19(7):887-897.
33.
MuratogluOKBragdonCRO’ConnorDO. Larger diameter femoral heads used in conjunction with a highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. J Arthrop. 2001;16(8 suppl 1):24-30.
34.
New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. The New Zealand Joint Registry fourteen year report: January 1999 to December 2012. Christchurch: New Zealand Orthopaedic Association; 2013.
35.
PopoolaOOYaoJQJohnsonTSBlanchardCR. Wear, delamination, and fatigue resistance of melt-annealed highly crosslinked UHMWPE cruciate-retained knee inserts under activities of daily living. J Orthop Res. 2010;28:1120-1126.
36.
ReggianiBLeardiniACorazzaFTaylorM. Finite element analysis of a total ankle replacement during the stance phase of gait. J Biomech. 2006;39:1435-1443.
37.
RöhrlSMLiMGNilssonKGNivbrantB. Very low wear of nonremelted highly cross-linked polyethylene cups—an RSA study lasting up to 6 years. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(6):739-745.
38.
SaikkoVCaloniusOKeranenJ. Wear of conventional and cross-linked ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular cups against polished and roughened CoCr femoral heads in a biaxial hip simulator. J Biomed Mat Res (Appl Biomat). 2002;63:848-853.
39.
ScottMForsterHJaniSVadodariaKSauerWAnthonyM. Validation of an alternative method for isolating UHMWPE wear debris from joint simulator serum. Paper presented at: World Biomaterials Congress; May 2000; Kamuela, HI.
40.
StaufferRNChaoEYSBrewsterRC. Force and motion analysis of the normal, diseased, and prosthetic ankle joint. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1977;127:189-196.
41.
Swedish Ankle Register. The Swedish Ankle Register for total ankle replacements and ankle arthrodesis—annual report for 2012. Malmö: Swedish Ankle Register; 2013.
42.
WirthMAKlotzCDeffenbaughDLMcNultyDRichardsLTipperJL. Cross-linked glenoid prosthesis: a wear comparison to conventional glenoid prosthesis with wear particular analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:130-137.
