Assessment of Coronal Plane Subtalar Joint Alignment in Peritalar Subluxation via Weight-Bearing Multiplanar Imaging

Abstract

Background:

Patients with adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) develop peritalar subluxation, which may stem from valgus inclination of the inferior surface of the talus. We hypothesized that patients with AAFD would have an increased valgus tilt of the subtalar joint in the coronal plane compared to controls when assessed with a novel multiplanar weight-bearing imaging (MP-WB).

Methods:

Eighteen normal and 36 stage II AAFD patients scheduled to undergo operative reconstruction were evaluated by MP-WB through measuring 3 novel angles of the subtalar joint in the coronal view: (1) angle between inferior facet of the talus and the horizontal/floor (inftal-hor), (2) angle between inferior and superior facets of the talus (inftal-suptal), and (3) angle between inferior facet of the talus and superior facet of the calcaneus (inftal-supcal). Intra- and interobserver reliability were evaluated via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Differences in angles between AAFD patients and controls were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Results:

Intra- and interobserver reliability were excellent for inftal-hor (ICC .942 and .991, respectively) and inftal-suptal (ICC .948 and .989, respectively), and moderate-good for inftal-supcal (ICC .604 and .742, respectively). Inftal-hor and inftal-suptal angles were found to be significantly greater in AAFD patients (P < 0.001) at all 3 locations along the posterior subtalar joint, while inftal-supcal did not demonstrate a significant difference (P = .741). While controls exhibited varus orientation at the anterior aspect of the joint, AAFD patients maintained a valgus orientation throughout.

Conclusion:

Inftal-hor and inftal-suptal angles provided a reliable means of evaluating the orientation of the subtalar joint axis in AAFD via MP-WB, and showed that the subtalar joint had increased valgus orientation in AAFD compared to controls. This may allow for identification of patients at risk for developing AAFD, and could potentially be used in guiding operative reconstruction.

Level of Evidence:

Level III, comparative series.

Keywords

flatfoot adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD)tibialis posterior tendon insufficiency Mulitplanar Weightbearing Imaging (MP-WB)inferior talus-horizontal angle (inftal-hor)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ananthakrisnan

Ching

Tencer

Hansen

Jr Sangeorzan

. Subluxation of the talocalcaneal joint in adults who have symptomatic flatfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(8):1147-54.

Aranow

. Tendon transfer options in managing the adult flexible flatfoot. Foot Ankle Clin N Am. 2012;17(2):205-226. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2012.02.001.

Deland

. Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(7):399-406.

Ellis

Deyer

Williams

. Assessment of lateral hindfoot pain in acquired flatfoot deformity using weightbearing multiplanar imaging. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(5):361-371. doi:10.3113/FAI.2010.0361.

Ferri

Scharfenberger

Goplen

Daniels

Pearce

. Weightbearing CT scan of severe flexible pes planus deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(2):199-204. doi:10.3113/FAI.2008.0199.

Gentili

Masih

Yao

Seeger

. Foot axes and angles. Brit J Rad. 1996;69(826):968-974. doi:10.1259/0007-1285-69-826-968.

Haleem

Pavlov

Bogner

. Comparison of deformity with respect to talus in adult acquired flatfoot patients and controls using multi-planar weight-bearing imaging versus conventional radiography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(8):1-8. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.01205.

Kido

Ikoma

Imai

. Load response of the medial longitudinal arch in patients with flatfoot deformity: in vivo 3D study. Clin Biomech. 2013;28(5):568-573. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.04.004.

Kido

Ikoma

Maki

. Load response of the tarsal bones in patients with flatfoot deformity: in vivo 3D study. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(11):1017-1022. doi:10.3113/FAI.2011.1017.

10.

Landis

Koch

. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977;33(2):363-374.

11.

Ledoux

Rohr

Ching

Sangeorzan

. Effect of foot shape on the three-dimensional position of foot bones. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(12):2176-2186. doi:10.1002/jor.20262.

12.

Myerson

. Adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Treatment of dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon. Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:393-405.

13.

Perry

Mont

Einhorn

Waller

. The validity of measurements made on standard foot orthoroentgenograms. Foot Ankle Int. 1992;13(9):502-507. doi:10.1177/107110079201300902.

14.

Sensiba

Coffey

Williams

Mariscalco

Laughlin

. Inter- and intraobserver reliability in the radiographic evaluation of adult flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(2):141-145. doi:10.3113/FAI.2010.0141.

15.

Younger

Sawatzky

Dryden

. radiographic assessment of adult flatfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(10):820-825. doi:10.1177/107110070502601006.

16.

Zhang

Wang

. An in vivo study of hindfoot 3D kinetics in stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD). Flatfoot based on weight-bearing CT scan. Bone Joint Res. 2013;2(12):255-263. doi:10.1302/2046-3758.212.2000220.