Alonso-VazquezAVillarroyaMAFrancoMAAsinJCalvoB. Kinematic assessment of paediatric forefoot varus. Gait Posture. 2009;29:214-219.
2.
ArnoldJBMackintoshSJonesSThewlisD. Repeatability of stance phase kinematics from a multisegment foot model in people aged 50 years and older. Gait Posture. 2013;38:349-351.
3.
BalzerJSchelldorferSBauerCvan der LindenML. Effects of simulated crouch gait on foot kinematics and kinetics in healthy children. Gait Posture. 2013;38(4):619-624.
4.
BatesJEStebbinsJAMcCahillJTheologisTNMorrisC. Correlation between the Oxford Foot Model kinematics and the Oxford Ankle Foot questionnaire. Gait Posture. 2012;36:S36.
5.
BeischerADBrodskyJWPolloFEPeereboomJ. Functional outcome and gait analysis after triple or double arthrodesis.Foot Ankle Int.1999;20(9):545-553.
6.
BenedettiMGIngrossoSLeardiniACasanelliSGianniniS. Gait analysis of a novel design of total ankle replacement. Gait Posture. 2008;28:S77.
7.
BenedettiMGMancaMFerraresiGBoschiMLeardiniA. A new protocol for 3D assessment of foot during gait: application on patients with equinovarus foot.Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 26(10):1033-1038.
8.
BirchIDeschampsK. Quantification of skin marker movement at the malleoli and talar heads. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2011;101(6):497-504.
9.
BrodskyJWBaumBSPolloFEMehtaH. Prospective gait analysis in patients with first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis for hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(2):162-165.
10.
BrodskyJWCharlickDAColemanSCPolloFERoyerCT. Hindfoot motion following reconstruction for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(7):613-618.
11.
BrodskyJWPoloFEColemanSCBruckN. Changes in gait following the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(20):1890-1896.
12.
BrueningDACooneyKMBuczekFL. Analysis of a kinetic multisegment foot model. Part I: model repeatability and kinematic validity. Gait Posture. 2012;35(4):529-534.
13.
BrueningDACooneyKMBuczekFL. Analysis of a kinetic multisegment foot model part II: kinetics and clinical implications. Gait Posture. 2012;35(4):535-540.
14.
CansecoKLongJMarksRKhazzamMHarrisG. Quantitative characterization of gait kinematics in patients with hallux rigidus using the Milwaukee foot model. J Orthop Res. 2008;26(4):419-427.
15.
CansecoKLongJMarksRKhazzamMHarrisG. Quantitative motion analysis in patients with hallux rigidus before and after cheilectomy. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(1):128-134.
16.
CansecoKLongJSmedbergTTarimaSMarksRMHarrisGF. Multisegmental foot and ankle motion analysis after hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(2):141-147.
17.
CansecoKRankineLLongJSmedbergTMarksRMHarrisGF. Motion of the multisegmental foot in hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(2):146-152.
18.
CaravaggiPBenedettiMGBertiLLeardiniA. Repeatability of a multisegment foot protocol in adult subjects. Gait Posture. 2011;33(1):133-135.
19.
CarsonMCHarringtonMEThompsonNO’ConnorJJTheologisTN. Kinematic analysis of a multisegment foot model for research and clinical applications: a repeatability analysis. J Biomech. 2001;34(10):1299-1307.
20.
CenniFLeardiniAPieriM. Functional performance of a total ankle replacement: thorough assessment by combining gait and fluoroscopic analyses. Clin Biomech. 2013;28:79-87.
21.
CurtisDJBenckeJStebbinsJAStansfieldB. Intra-rater repeatability of the Oxford foot model in healthy children in different stages of the foot roll over process during gait. Gait Posture. 2009;30(1):118-121.
22.
De MitsSSegersVWoodburnJElewautDDe ClercqDRoosenP. A clinically applicable six-segmented foot model. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(4):655-661.
23.
DeschampsKBirchIDesloovereKMatricaliGA. The impact of hallux valgus on foot kinematics: a cross-sectional, comparative study. Gait Posture. 2010;32:102-106.
24.
DeschampsKStaesFBruyninckxH. Repeatability in the assessment of multisegment foot kinematics. Gait Posture. 2012;35(2):255-260.
25.
DeschampsKStaesFRoosenP. Body of evidence supporting the clinical use of 3D multisegment foot models: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2011;33(3):338-349.
26.
DesloovereK. Repeatability of a 3D multisegment foot model protocol in presence of foot deformities. Gait Posture, 2012;36(3):635-638.
27.
de VriesGRoyKChesterV. Using three-dimensional gait data for foot/ankle orthopaedic surgery. Open Orthop J. 2009;3:89-95.
28.
DixonPCBohmHDoderleinL. Ankle and midfoot kinetics during normal gait: a multisegment approach. J Biomech. 2012;45(6):1011-1016.
29.
GarlingEHKapteinBLMertensB. Soft-tissue artefact assessment during step-up using fluoroscopy and skin-mounted markers. J Biomech. 2007;40(suppl 1):S18-S24.
30.
GiacomozziCBenedettiMGLeardiniAMacellariVGianniniS. Gait analysis with an integrated system for functional assessment of talocalcaneal coalition. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2006;96:107-115.
31.
HahnMEWrightESSegalADOrenduffMSLedouxWRSangeorzanBJ. Comparative gait analysis of ankle arthrodesis and arthroplasty: initial findings of a prospective study.Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(4):282-289.
32.
HouckJRTomeJMNawoczenskiDA. Subtalar neutral position as an offset for a kinematic model of the foot during walking. Gait Posture. 2008;28(1):29-37.
33.
JenkynTRNicolAC. A multisegment kinematic model of the foot with a novel definition of forefoot motion for use in clinical gait analysis during walking. J Biomech. 2007;40(14):3271-3278.
34.
KabadaMPRamakrishnanHKWoottenME. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res. 1990;8(3):383-392.
35.
KhazzamMLongJTMarksRMHarrisGF. Kinematic changes of the foot and ankle in patients with systemic rheumatoid arthritis and forefoot deformity. J Orthop Res. 2007;25(3):319-329.
36.
KhazzamMLongJTMarksRMHarrisGF. Preoperative gait characterization of patients with ankle arthrosis. Gait Posture. 2006;24(1):85-93.
37.
KidderSMAbuzzahabFSHarrisGFJohnsonJE. A system for the analysis of foot and ankle kinematics during gait. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1996;4(1):25-32.
38.
KitaokaHBAhnTKLuoZPAnKN. Stability of the arch of the foot. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18(10):644-648.
39.
KitaokaHBLundbergALuoZPAnKN. Kinematics of the normal arch of the foot and ankle under physiologic loading. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16(8):492-499.
40.
LeardiniABenedettiMGBertiLBettinelliDNativoRGianniniS. Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot motion during the stance phase of gait. Gait Posture. 2007;25(3):453-462.
41.
LeardiniABenedettiMGCataniFSimonciniLGianniniS. An anatomically based protocol for the description of foot segment kinematics during gait. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999;14(8):528-536.
42.
LeardiniACataniFRomagnoliM. A novel total ankle replacement: from biomechanics research to clinical outcome. J Biomech. 2013;40:S93.
43.
Legault-MooreDChesterVLde VriesG. Multisegment foot kinematics during walking in younger and older adults. J Clin Med Res. 2012;4(4):259-66.
44.
LevingerPMurleyGSBartonCJCotchettMPMcSweeneySRMenzHB. A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal- and flat-arched feet using the Oxford Foot Model. Gait Posture. 2010;32:519-523.
45.
LongJTEastwoodDCGrafARSmithPAHarrisGF. Repeatability and sources of variability in multicenter assessment of segmental foot kinematics in normal adults. Gait Posture. 2012;31(1):32-36.
46.
LongJTWangMWintersJMHarrisGF. A multisegmental foot model with bone-based referencing: sensitivity to radiographic input parameters. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Sci. 2008;879-882.
47.
LuiWSieglerSHillstromHWhitneyK. Three-dimensional, six-degrees-of-freedom kinematics of the human hindfoot during the stance phase of level walking. Hum Mov Sci. 1997;16:283-298.
48.
LundbergAGoldieIKalinBSelvikG. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex: plantarflexion and dorsiflexion. Foot Ankle. 1989;9(4):194-200.
49.
LundgrenPNesterCLiuA. Invasive in vivo measurement of rear-, mid- and forefoot motion during walking. Gait Posture. 2008;28(1):93-100.
50.
LundbergASvenssonOKBylundCGoldieISelvikG. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex-part 2: Pronation and supination. Foot Ankle. 1989;9(5):248-253.
51.
LundbergASvenssonOKBylundCSelvikG. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex-part 3: influence of leg rotation. Foot Ankle. 1989;9(6):304-309.
52.
MacWilliamsBACowleyMNicholsonDE. Foot kinematics and kinetics during adolescent gait. Gait Posture. 2003;17(3):214-224.
53.
MarksRM. Hallux rigidus: surgical treatment with the crescentic oblique basilar resection arthroplasty (COBRA). Foot Ankle Clin. 2009;14(1):23-32.
54.
MarksRMLongJTNessMEKhazzamMHarrisGF. Surgical reconstruction of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction: prospective comparison of flexor digitorum longus substitution combined with lateral column lengthening or medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy. Gait Posture. 2009;29(1):17-22.
55.
MaurerJDWardVMaysonTA. A kinematic description of dynamic midfoot break in children using a multisegment foot model. Gait Posture. 2013;38(2):287-292.
56.
McCahillJStebbinsJAGiacomozziCTheologisTN. Correlation between plantar pressure and Oxford Foot Model kinematics in clubfoot. Gait Posture. 2009;30:S52-S53.
57.
MerkerJHartmannMKreuzpointnerF. Characterisation of pes planovalgus by patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis with the Oxford Foot Model. Gait Posture. 2012;36:S38-S39.
58.
MyersKAWangMMarksRMHarrisGF. Validation of a multisegment foot and ankle kinematic model for pediatric gait. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2004;12(1):122-130.
59.
NessMELongJMarksRHarrisG. Foot and ankle kinematics in patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Gait Posture. 2008;27(2):331-339.
60.
NesterCJonesRKLiuA. Foot kinematics during walking measured using bone and surface mounted markers. J Biomech. 2007;40(15):3412-3423.
61.
NesterCJLiuAMWardEHowardDCochebaJDerrickT. Error in the description of foot kinematics due to violation of rigid body assumptions. J Biomech. 2010;43(4):666-672.
62.
NovakACBrouwerB. Sagittal and frontal lower limb joint moments during stair ascent and descent in young and older adults. Gait Posture. 2011;33(1):54-60.
63.
NovakACOlneySJBaggSBrouwerB. Gait changes following botulinum toxin A treatment in stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16(5):367-376.
O’ConnellPGLohmannSiegelKKeppleTMStanhopeSJGerberLH. Foot deformity, pain, and mobility in rheumatoid and nonarthritic subjects.J Rheumatol.1998;25(9):1681-1686.
66.
PlattoMJO’ConnellPGHicksJEGerberLH. The relationship of pain and deformity of the rheumatoid foot to gait and an index of functional ambulation. J Rheumatol. 1991;18:38-43.
67.
PowellDWWilliamsDSButlerRJ. A comparison of two multisegment foot models in high-and low-arched athletes. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2013;103:99-105.
ReeckJFeltenNMcCormackAPKiserPTencerAFSangeorzanBJ. Support of the talus: a biomechanical investigation of the contributions of the talonavicular and talocalcaneal joints, and the superomedial calcaneonavicular ligament. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(10):674-682.
70.
ReinschmidtCvan den BogertAJNiggBMLundbergAMurphyN. Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. J Biomech. 1997;30(7):729-732.
71.
RobertsonDGCaldwellGEHamillJKamenJWhittleseySN. Research Methods in Biomechanics. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004.
72.
SammarcoVJ. The talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints: anatomy, biomechanics, and clinical management of the transverse tarsal joint. Foot Ankle Clin. 2004;9(1):127-145.
73.
SaraswatPMacWilliamsBADavisRB. A multisegment foot model based on anatomically registered technical coordinate systems: method repeatability in pediatric feet.Gait Posture. 35(4):547-555.
74.
ScottSHWinterDA. Biomechanical model of the human foot: kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking. J Biomech. 1993;26(9):1091-1104.
75.
ShultzRKedgleyAEJenkynTR. Quantifying skin motion artifact error of the hindfoot and forefoot marker clusters with the optical tracking of a multisegment foot model using single-plane fluoroscopy. Gait Posture. 2011;34(1): 44-48.
76.
SiegelKLKeppleTMO’ConnellPGGerberLHStanhopeSJ. A technique to evaluate foot function during the stance phase of gait. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16(12):764-770.
77.
StagniRFantozziSCappelloALeardiniA. Quantification of soft tissue artefact in motion analysis by combining 3D fluoroscopy and stereophotogrammetry: a study on two subjects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005;20(3):320-329.
78.
StebbinsJHarringtonMThompsonNZavatskyATheologisT. Gait compensations caused by foot deformity in cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2010;32(2):226-230.
79.
StebbinsJHarringtonMThompsonNZavatskyATheologisT. Repeatability of a model for measuring multisegment foot kinematics in children. Gait Posture. 2006;23(4):401-410.
80.
StebbinsJAZavatskyNThompsonNTheologisTN. Repeatability of the Oxford Foot Model in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2012;28:S21-S22.
81.
TelferSMorlanGHyslopESempleRRaffertyDWoodburnJ. A novel device for improving marker placement accuracy. Gait Posture. 2010;32(4):536-539.
82.
TurnerDEHelliwellPSSiegelKLWoodburnJ. Biomechanics of the foot in rheumatoid arthritis: identifying abnormal function and the factors associated with localised disease “impact.”Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23(1):93-100.
83.
TurnerDEWoodburnJ. Characterising the clinical and biomechanical features of severely deformed feet in rheumatoid arthritis. Gait Posture. 2008;28(4):574-580.
84.
WangRThurCKGutierrez-FarewikEMWretenbergPBrostromE. One year follow-up after operative ankle fractures: a prospective gait analysis study with a multisegment foot model. Gait Posture. 2009;31:234-240.
85.
WestbladPHashimotoTWinsonILundbergAArndtA. Differences in ankle-joint complex motion during the stance phase of walking as measured by superficial and bone-anchored markers. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23(9):856-863.
86.
WilkenJRaoSSaltzmanCYackHJ. The effect of arch height on kinematic coupling during walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011;26(3):318-323.
87.
WinterDA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. 3rd ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2005.
88.
WoodburnJNelsonKMSiegelKLKeppleTMGerberLH. Multisegment foot motion during gait: proof of concept in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(10):1918-1927.
89.
WolfPStacoffALiuA. Functional units of the human foot. Gait Posture. 2008;28(3):434-441.
90.
WrightCJArnoldBLCoffeyTGPidcoePE. Repeatability of the modified Oxford foot model during gait in healthy adults. Gait Posture. 2011;33(1):108-112.
