Radiographic Angles in Hallux Valgus: Differences Between Measurements Made Manually and With a Computerized Program

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to compare angular measurements in the evaluation of hallux valgus deformities using a goniometer and a computerized program to assess degree of concordance between the two methods and determine the reliability of manual measurements. Methods: Angles measured included the hallux valgus angle (HVA), the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), and the proximal phalangeal articular angle (PPAA), also called the hallux valgus interphalangeus angle or interphalangeal angle. Measurements were made on preoperative weightbearing radiographs in 176 patients with symptomatic hallux valgus. Manual measurements were made with a goniometer by an orthopaedic surgeon. An independent experienced technician used digitized images to perform angular measurements with the Autocad® software program (Autodesk Inc., San Rafael, CA). Results: HVA values obtained with the two techniques were similar. However, significantly higher mean values were obtained with the Autocad® for the IMA and PPAA measurements, and higher mean values were obtained for the DMAA measurement with the manual technique. Whereas differences were more or less randomly distributed for the HVA, in the remaining patients, measurements were clearly related to the measurement technique, i.e., for the DMAA, the manual technique had a tendency to show higher values, and for the IMA and PPAA the manual technique showed lower values than the computer. Correlations between both techniques for the different angular measurements were as follows: HVA, −0.179 (p = 0.018); DMMA, −0.294 (p >0.001); PPAA, −0.876 (p >0.001); and IMA, −0.661 (p >0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed that the concordance between manual and Autocad® angular measurements was excellent for the HVA (ICC = 0.89) and DMAA (ICC = 0.80) and very poor for the PPAA (ICC = 0.11) and IMA (ICC = 0.42). Conclusions: Angular measurements made on weightbearing radiographs with the Autocad® in patients with hallux valgus deformities were more reliable than those made with a goniometer. Although for large angles, such as HVA and DMAA, results obtained with both measurement techniques were similar. Manual measurements, however, may underestimate the true values of the smaller IMA and PPAA angles.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Bland

Altman

: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1: 307–310, 1986

2. Bland

Altman

: A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput. Biol. Med. 20: 337–340, 1990

3. Bland

Altman

: Comparing two methods of clinical measurement: a personal history. Int. J. Epidemiol. 24 (Suppl 1): S7–S14, 1995

4. Brogger

: SSKAPP: Stata module to compute sample size for the kappa-statistic measure of interrater agreement. Available from: http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s415604.html via the INTERNET. Accessed 2004 Aug 24

5. Chi

Davitt

Younger

Holt

Sangeorzan

: Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the distal metatarsal articular angle in adult hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 22: 722–726, 2002

6. Chmura Kraemer

Periyakoil

Noda

: Kappa coefficients in medical research. Stat. Med. 21: 2109–2129, 2002

7. Condon

Kaliszer

Conhyea

: The first intermetatarsal angle in hallux valgus: an analysis of measurement reliability and the error involved. Foot Ankle Int. 22: 717–721, 2002

8. Coughlin

: Hallux valgus. J. Bone Joint Surg. 78-A: 932–966, 1996

9. Coughlin

Freund

: The reliability of angular measurements in hallux valgus deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 22: 369–379, 2001

10.

10. Coughlin

Saltzman

Nunley

: Angular measurements in the evaluation of hallux valgus deformities: a report of the ad hoc committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society on angular measurements. Foot Ankle Int. 23: 68–74, 2002

11.

11. Hardy

Clapham

: Observations on hallux valgus based on a controlled series. J. Bone Joint Surg. 33-B: 376–391, 1951

12.

12. Kramer

Feinstein

: Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics concordance. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 29: 111–123, 1981

13.

13. Landis

Koch

: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–174, 1977

14.

14. Lee

Koh

Ong

: Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable. Comput. Biol. Med. 19: 61–70, 1989

15.

15. Resch

Ryd

Stenström

Johnsson

Reynisson

: Measuring hallux valgus: a comparison of conventional radiography and clinical parameters with regard to measurement accuracy. Foot Ankle Int. 16: 267–270, 1995

16.

16. Schneider

Csepan

Knahr

: Reproducibility of the radiographic metatarsophalangeal angle in hallux surgery. J. Bone Joint Surg. 85-A: 494–499, 2003

17.

17. Smith

Reynolds

Stewart

: Hallux valgus assessment: report of Research Committee of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Foot Ankle 5: 92–103, 1984

18.

18. Tanaka

Takakura

Kumai

Samoto

Tamai

: Radiographic analysis of hallux valgus. A two-dimensional coordinate system. J. Bone Joint Surg. 77-A: 205–213, 1995