Kinematic Changes After Fusion and Total Replacement of the Ankle Part 1: Range of Motion

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine how closely the present designs of ankle prostheses mimic the unique requirements of the foot and ankle. The three-dimensional range of motion (ROM) of the ankle joint complex, before and after ankle arthrodesis and after implantation of three currently used total ankle prostheses, was investigated. Methods: The three-dimensional ROM was determined in six fresh-frozen cadaver leg specimens using a 6-df device with an axial load of 200 N and a four-camera high-speed video system. A moment of 100 Nm was applied to the footplate to determine the ROM in the sagittal (dorsiflexion and plantarflexion) and frontal (inversion and eversion) planes. The same moment was applied to the tibia to determine the ROM for the internal and external tibial rotation. The measurements were performed for the normal ankle, the fused ankle, and the AGILITY, HINTEGRA, and S.T.A.R. prostheses. Results: Compared to the normal condition, the ROM for dorsiflexion and plantarflexion was changed for all surgical interventions. The changes were highest for the ankle arthrodesis. The changes due to the prostheses were significantly less than the changes due to ankle arthrodesis. Compared to the normal condition, the total ROM for inversion/eversion was slightly decreased by the fused ankle and not changed by the three-component prostheses (HINTEGRA, S.T.A.R.). However, the ROM for inversion/eversion was significantly higher for the two-component prosthesis, AGILITY. The ROM for internal and external tibial rotation was not altered by the AGILITY and HINTEGRA ankle, but it was significantly reduced by the ankle arthrodesis. S.T.A.R. showed a significant shift of the total ROM toward internal tibial rotation. Conclusions: The three tested ankle joint prostheses changed the ROM of the ankle joint complex less than ankle fusion did. Total ankle prostheses were shown to replicate normal joint ROM closely. However, ankle arthrodesis was found to reduce the ROM substantially in all three planes: the sagittal, frontal, and horizontal planes. Clinical Implications: With respect to the ROM, total ankle replacement changes the natural ankle joint condition less than ankle arthrodesis, which reduces the ROM in all three planes and might increase stress in adjacent structures. The prosthesis that replicated the normal ankle joint ROM best was the one with the most anatomical design.

Keywords

Ankle Arthrodesis Arthroplasty Biomechanics Hindfoot Range of Motion Total Ankle Replacement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Boobbyer

: The long-term results of ankle arthrodesis Acta Orthop. Scand. 52:107–110, 1981.

2. Close

: Some applications of the functional anatomy of the ankle joint J. Bone Joint Surg. 38-A:761–781, 1956.

3. Deland

Morris

Sung

: Biomechanics of the ankle joint. A perspective on total ankle replacement Foot Ankle Clin. 5:747–759, 2000.

4. Gellmann

Lenihan

Halikis

: Selective tarsal arthrodesis: an in vitro analysis of the effect on foot motion Foot Ankle 8:127–133, 1987.

5. Glick

Morgan

Myerson

Sampson

Mann

: Ankle arthrodesis using an arthroscopic method: long-term follow-up of 34 cases Arthroscopy 12:428–434, 1996.

6. Hefti

Baumann

Morscher

: Ankle joint fusion – determination of optimal position by gait analysis Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 96:187–195, 1980.

7. Hintermann

: Short- and mid-term results with the S.T.A.R. total ankle prosthesis Orthopaede 28:792–803, 1999.

8. Hintermann

Nigg

: Influence of arthrodeses on kinematics of the axially loaded ankle complex during dorsiflexion/plantarflexion Foot Ankle Int. 16:633–636, 1995.

9. Hintermann

Nigg

Sommer

Cole

: The transfer movement between tibia and calcaneus Clin. Biomech. 9:349–355, 1994.

10.

10. Hintermann

Valderrabano

: Total ankle joint replacement Z. Arztl. Fortbild. Qualitatssich. 95:187–194, 2001.

11.

11. Kofoed

Lundberg-Jensen

: Ankle arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 50 years: a prospective series with long-term follow-up Foot Ankle Int. 20:501–506, 1999.

12.

12. Kofoed

Stürup

: Comparison of ankle arthroplasty and arthrodesis. A prospective series with long-term follow-up Foot 4:6–9, 1994.

13.

13. Lance

Paval

Fries

Larsen

Patterson

Jr : Arthrodesis of the ankle joint. A follow-up study Clin. Orthop. 142:146–158, 1979.

14.

14. Lundberg

Goldie

Kalin

Selvik

: Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex: plantarflexion and dorsiflexion Foot Ankle 9:194–200, 1989.

15.

15. Lundberg

Svensson

Bylund

Goldie

Selvik

: Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex. Part 2: Pronation and supination Foot Ankle 9:248–253, 1989.

16.

16. Lundberg

Svensson

Bylund

Selvik

: Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex. Part 3: Influence of leg rotation Foot Ankle 9:304–309, 1989.

17.

17. Lundberg

Svensson

Nemeth

Selvik

: The axis of rotation of the ankle joint J. Bone Joint Surg. 71-B:94–99, 1989.

18.

18. Lynch

Bourne

Rorabeck

: The long-term results of ankle arthrodesis J. Bone Joint Surg. 70-B:113–116, 1988.

19.

19. Mazur

Schwartz

Simon

: Ankle arthrodesis. Long-term follow-up with gait analysis J. Bone Joint Surg. 61-A:964–975, 1979.

20.

20. Pyevich

Saltzman

Callaghan

Alvine

: Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve-year follow-up J. Bone Joint Surg. 80-A:1410–1420, 1998.

21.

21. Stahelin

Nigg

Stefanyshyn

van den Bogert

Kim

: A method to determine bone movement in the ankle joint complex in vitro J. Biomech. 30:513–516, 1997.

22.

22. Stauffer

Chao

Brewster

: Force and motion analysis of the normal, diseased, and prosthetic ankle joint Clin. Orthop. 127:189–196, 1977.

23.

23. Waters

Barnes

Husserl

Silver

Liss

: Comparable energy expenditure after arthrodesis of the hip and ankle J. Bone Joint Surg. 70-A:1032–1037, 1988.