An in vitro simulator was developed to reproduce the kinematics and kinetics of stance phase gait on cadaver foot specimens. Ground reaction force was applied by a tilting angle- and force-controlled translation stage upon which a pressure measuring platform was mounted; tibial rotation was reproduced by a servomotor. Force was applied to nine tendons of the foot flexor and extensor muscle groups, and three-dimensional hind- and forefoot motion was measured. The model was verified based on in vivo kinematic and kinetic measurements. It was found to be in good general agreement with some exceptions which include a slightly more lateral gait line.
AllingerTLEngsbergJR: A method to determine the range of motion of the ankle joint complex, in vivo. J. Biomech.26(1):69–76, 1993.
2.
BeckerHRosenbaumDClaesLGerngroH: Measurement of plantar pressure distribution during gait for diagnosis of functional lateral ankle instability. Clin. Biomech.12(3):S19, 1997.
3.
BertschCRosenbaumDClaesL: [Intra-articular and plantar pressure distribution of the ankle joint complex in relation to foot position]. Unfallchirurg104(5):426–433, 2001.
4.
BrandRAPedersenDRFriederichJA: The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area. J. Biomech.19(8):589–596, 1986.
5.
CarsonMCHarringtonMEThompsonNO'ConnorJJTheologisTN: Kinematic analysis of a multi-segment foot model for research and clinical applications: a repeatability analysis. J. Biomech.34(10):1299–1307, 2001.
6.
CavanaghPRPerryJEUlbrechtJSDerrJAPammerSE: Neuropathic diabetic patients do not have reduced variability of plantar loading during gait. Gait Posture.7(3):191–199, 1998.
7.
CuttsA: The range of sarcomere lengths in the muscles of the human lower limb. J. Anat.160:79–88, 1988.
8.
DebrunnerHUJacobHAC: Biomechanik des Fusses, Stuttgart, Ferdinand Enke Verlag, 1998.
9.
FickR: Handbuch der Anatomie und Mechanik der Gelenke unter Berücksichtigung der bewegenden Muskeln, Jena, Fischer, 1910.
10.
FriederichJABrandRA: Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb. J. Biomech.23(1):91–95, 1990.
11.
FukunagaTRoyRRShellockFGHodgsonJADayMKLeePLKwong-FuHEdgertonVR: Physiological cross-sectional area of human leg muscles based on magnetic resonance imaging. J. Orthop. Res.10(6):926–934, 1992.
12.
GefenAMegido-RavidMItzchakYArcanM: Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional foot structure during gait: a basic tool for clinical applications. J. Biomech. Eng.122(6):630–639, 2000.
13.
GlitschUBaumannW: The three-dimensional determination of internal loads in the lower extremity. J. Biomech.30(11–12):1123–1131, 1997.
14.
HamelAJDonahueSWSharkeyNA: Contributions of active and passive toe flexion to forefoot loading. Clin. Orthop.393:326–334, 2001.
15.
HansenMLOtisJCKenneallySMDelandJT: A closed-loop cadaveric foot and ankle loading model. J. Biomech.34(4):551–555, 2001.
16.
HintermannBNiggBMSommerC: Foot movement and tendon excursion: an in vitro study. Foot Ankle Int.15(7):386–395, 1994.
17.
HuangCKKitaokaHBAnKNChaoEY: Biomechanical evaluation of longitudinal arch stability. Foot Ankle14(6):353–357, 1993.
18.
HuijingPA: Architecture of the human gastrocnemius muscle and some functional consequences. Acta Anat. (Basel)123(2):101–107, 1985.
19.
IkaiMFukunagaT: Calculation of muscle strength per unit cross-sectional area of human muscle by means of ultrasonic measurement. Int. Z. Angew. Physiol.26(1):26–32, 1968.
20.
InmanVT: The Joints of the Ankle, Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1976.
21.
JohnsonJV: Ergeb. Physiol.2(2):623, 1903.
22.
LundbergA: Kinematics of the ankle and foot. In vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Acta Orthop. Scand. Suppl.233:1–24, 1989.
23.
MannRA: Biomechanics of the foot and ankle. In: CoughlinMJMannRA, eds, Surgery of the Foot and Ankle, St. Louis, Mosby, 1999, pp. 2–35.
24.
MichelsonJDHamelAJBuczekFLSharkeyNA: Kinematic behavior of the ankle following malleolar fracture repair in a high-fidelity cadaver model. J. Bone Joint Surg.84-A(11):2029–2038, 2002.
25.
MorrisCB: The measurements of the strength of muscle relative to the cross-section. Res. Q. Am. Assoc. Health Phys. Ed. Recrn.19:295–303, 1948.
26.
PerryJ: Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function, Thorofare, SLACK Inc., 1992.
27.
RecklinghausenN: Gliedermechanik und Lahmungsprothesen, Berlin, Springer, 1920.
28.
RoseJGambleJG: Human Walking.Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1994.
29.
RosenbaumDBeckerHPWilkeHJClaesLE: Tenodeses destroy the kinematic coupling of the ankle joint complex. A three-dimensional in vitro analysis of joint movement [see comments]. J. Bone Joint Surg.80-B(1):162–168, 1998.
30.
RosenbaumDSchmittHBertschCBauerGClaesL: [Foot stress simulator for biomechanical in vitro studies of lower leg segments]. Biomed. Tech. (Berl.)41(5):143–150, 1996.
31.
SharkeyNAFerrisLDonahueSW: Biomechanical consequences of plantar fascial release or rupture during gait: part I — disruptions in longitudinal arch conformation. Foot Ankle Int.19(12):812–820, 1998.
32.
SharkeyNAHamelAJ: A dynamic cadaver model of the stance phase of gait: performance characteristics and kinetic validation. Clin. Biomech.13:420–433, 1998.
33.
SnedecorGWCochranWG: Statistical Methods, Ames, IA, Iowa State University Press, 1989.
34.
SpoorCWVeldpausFE: Rigid body motion calculated from spatial co-ordinates of markers. J. Biomech.13(4):391–393, 1980.
35.
StähelinB: A method to determine bone movement in the ankle joint complex in vitro. J. Biomech.30(5):513–516, 1997.
36.
ThordarsonDBSchmotzerHChonJ: Reconstruction with tenodesis in an adult flatfoot model. A biomechanical evaluation of four methods. J. Bone Joint Surg.77-A(10):1557–1564, 1995.
37.
WinterDA: The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly, and pathological. Waterloo, Canada, Waterloo Biomechanics, 1991.
38.
WrightDGDesaiMEHendersonBS: Action of the subtalar and ankle-joint complex during the stance phase of walking. J. Bone Joint Surg.46-A:361, 1964.
