The bone density of cadaveric specimens is highly variable and has a significant effect on the results of biomechanical testing but it is not often assessed before testing is performed in the lab. Bone mineral density (BMD) tests such as dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are widely available, easy to perform and correlate highly and significantly with bone strength in many modes of failure. We present the results of two different studies performed on cadaveric foot and ankle specimens. In these studies the results vary significantly according to BMD, and this effect is not always eliminated with the use of matched pairs of cadaveric specimens.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
. BuhlerDW; BerlemannU.; OxlandTR; NolteLP: Moments and Forces During Pedicle Screw Insertion. Spine, 23:1220–1228, 1998.
2.
. CarterDR; HayesWC: Bone Compressive Strength: The Influence of Density and Strain Rate. Science, 194:1174–1176, 1976.
3.
. CarterDR; HayesWC: The Compressive Behavior of Bone as a Two-Phase Porous Structure. J. Bone Joint S;59-Am:954–962, 1977.
4.
. ChuIT; MyersonMS; NyskaM.; ParksBG: Experimental Flatfoot Model: The Implications of Dynamic Loading. Foot Ankle Int;22:220–225, 2001.
5.
. CoeJD; WardenKE; HerzigMA; McAfeePC: Influence of Bone Mineral Density on the Fixation of Thoracolumbar Implants: A Comparative Study of Transpedicular Screws, Laminar Hooks, and Spinous Process Wires. Spine, 15:902–907, 1990.
6.
. EbbesenEN; ThomsenJS; Beck-NeilsonH.; Nepper-RasmussenHJ; MosekildeL.: Lumbar Vertebral Body Compressive Strength Evaluated by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry, Quantitative Computed Tomography, and Ashing. Bone, 25:713–724, 1999.
7.
. FatayerjiD.; CooperAM; EastellR.: Total Body and Regional Bone Mineral Density in Men: Effect of Age. Osteop. Int;10:59–65, 1999.
8.
. GilbertSG; JohnsPC; ChowDC; BlackRC: Relation of Vertebral Bone Screw Axial Pullout Strength to Quantitative Computed Tomographic Trabecular Bone Mineral Content. J. Spinal Disorder, 6:513–521, 1993.
9.
. HallerJ.; AndreMP; ResnicD.; MillerC.; HowardBA; MitchellMJ; SchilsJP; SartorisDJ; TrudellD.: Detection of Thoracolumbar Vertebral Body Destruction with Lateral Spine Radiography. Part II: Clinical Investigation with Computed Tomography. Invest. Radiol;25:523–532, 1990.
10.
. KangC.; SpellerR.: Comparison of Ultrasound and Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurements in the Calcaneus. Br. J. Radiol;71:861–867, 1998.
11.
. KellyIP; GlissonRR; FinkC.; EasleyME; NunleyJA: Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Jones Fractures. Foot Ankle Int;22:585–589, 2001.
12.
. KimballHL; AronowMS; SullivanRJ; TarinalliDJ; NowakMD: Biomechanical Evaluation of Calcaneocuboid Distraction Arthodesis: A Cadaver Study of Two Different Fixation Methods. Foot Ankle Int;21:845–848, 2000.
13.
. LookerAC; OrwollES; JohnstonCC; LindsayRL; WahnerHW; DunnWL; CalvoMS; HarrisTB; HeyseSP: Prevalence of Low Femoral Bone Density in Older U.S. Adults from NHANES III. J. Bone Mineral Res; 12:1761–1768, 1997.
14.
. MannMR; ParksBG; PakSS; MillerSD: Tibiocalcaneal Arthrodesis: A Biomechanical Analysis of the Rotational Stability of the Biomet Ankle Arthrodesis Nail. Foot Ankle Int;22:731–733, 2000.
15.
. MarshallD.; JohnellO.; WedelH.: Meta-analysis of How Well Measures of Bone Mineral Density Predict Occurrence of Osteoporotic Fractures. Br. Med. J;312:1254–1259, 1996.
16.
. MeltonLJ: How Many Women Have Osteoporosis Now?J. Bone Mineral Res; 10:175–177, 1995.
17.
. MyersBR; BelmontPJ; RichardsonWJ; YuJR; HarperKD; NightingaleRW: The Role of Imaging and In Situ Biomechanical Testing in Assessing Pedicle Screw Pull-out Strength. Spine, 21:1962–1968, 1996.
18.
. NewmanAS; NegrineJP; ZecovicM.; StanfordP.; WalshWRA: Biomechanical Comparison of the Z Step-cut and Basilar Crescentric Osteotomies of the First Metatarsal. Foot Ankle Int.;21:584–587, 2000.
19.
. NjehCF; KuoCW; LangtonCM; AtrahHI; BoivinCM: Prediction of Human Femoral Bone Strength Using Ultrasound Velocity and BMD: An In Vitro Study. Osteop. Int;7:471–477, 1997.
20.
. NyskaM.; ParksBG; ChuIT; MyersonMS: The Contribution of the Medical Calcaneal Osteotomy to the Correction of Flatfoot Deformities. Foot Ankle Int;22:278–282, 2001.
21.
. OlschewskiE.; MurrayP.; BuckleyR.; FennellC.; PowellJN: Assessment of Osteoporosis Using Standard Radiographs of the Wrist. J. Trauma, 51:912–916, 2001.
22.
. RykenTC; ClausenJD; TraynelisVC; GoelVK: Biomechanical Analysis of Bone Mineral Density, Insertion Technique, Screw Torque, and Holding Strength of Anterior Cervical Plate Screws. J. Neurosurg;83:324–329, 1995.
. SnyderBD; ZaltzI.; HallJE; EmansJB: Predicting the Integrity of Vertebral Bone Screw Fixation in Anterior Spinal Instrumentation. Spine, 20:1568–1574, 1995.
25.
. TabenshyAD; WilliamsJ.; DeLucaV.; BrigantiE.; SeemanE.: Bone Mass, Areal, and Volumetric Bone Density are Equally Accurate, Sensitive, and Specific Surrogates of the Breaking Strength of the Vertebral Body: An In Vitro Study. J. Bone Mineral Res;11:1981–1989, 1996.
26.
. ThompsonMC; GesinkDS: Biomechanical Comparison of Syndesmosis Fixation with 3.5- and 4.5-millemeter Stainless Steel Screws. Foot Ankle Int; 21:736–741, 2000.
27.
. Van der VoortDJM; GuesensPP; DinantGJ: Risk Factors for Osteoporosis Related to Their Outcome: Fractures. Osteop. Int;12:630–638, 2001.
