This study quantified and compared the efficacy of in-shoe orthoses and ankle braces in stabilizing the hindfoot and medial longitudinal arch in a cadaveric model of acquired flexible flatfoot deformity. This was addressed by combining measurement of hindfoot and arch kinematics with plantar pressure distribution, produced in response to axial loads simulating quiet standing. Experiments were conducted on six fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs. Three conditions were tested: intact-unbraced; flatfoot-unbraced; and flatfoot-braced. Flatfoot deformity was created by sectioning the main support structures of the medial longitudinal arch. Six different braces were tested including two in-shoe orthoses, three ankle braces and one molded ankle-foot orthosis.
Our model of flexible flatfoot deformity caused the calcaneus to evert, the talus to plantarflex and the height of the talus and medial cuneiform to decrease. Flexible flatfoot deformity caused a pattern of medial shift in plantar pressure distribution, but minimal change in the location of the center of pressure. Furthermore, in-shoe orthoses stabilized both the hindfoot and the medial longitudinal arch, while ankle braces did not. Semi-rigid foot and ankle orthoses acted to stabilize the medial longitudinal arch. Based on these results, it was concluded that treatment of flatfoot deformity should at least include use of in-shoe orthoses to partially restore the arch and stabilize the hindfoot.
. ContiS.F.: Posterior Tibial Tendon Problems in Athletes. Orthop Clin North Am, 25(1): 109–121, 1994.
7.
. DavitJ.S.MacWilliamsB.A.ArmstrongP.F.: Plantar Pressure and Radiographic Changes After Distal Calcaneal Lengthening in Children and Adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop, 21(1): 70–75, 2001.
8.
. DelandJ.T.ArnoczkyS.P.ThompsonF.M.: Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity at the Talonavicular Joint: Reconstruction of the Spring Ligament in a In Vitro Model. Foot Ankle, 13(6): 327–332, July/August1992.
. GouldN.SchneiderW.AshikagaT.: Epidemiological Survey of Foot Problems in the Continental United States: 1978–1979. Foot Ankle, 1(1): 8–10, 1980.
11.
. GroodE.S.SuntayW.J.: A Joint Coordinate System for the Clinical Description of Three-Dimensional Motions: Application to the Knee. J Biomech Eng, 105:136–144, 1983.
12.
. HencerothW.D.IIDeyerleW.M.: The Acquired Unilateral Flatfoot in the Adult: Some Causative Factors. Foot Ankle, 2(5): 304–308, 1982.
13.
. HintermannB.NiggB.M.SommerC.: Foot Movement and Tendon Excursion: An In Vitro Study. Foot Ankle Int, 15(7): 386–395, July1994.
14.
. HolmesG.B.MannR.A.: Possible Epidemiological Factors Associated with Rupture of the Posterior Tibial Tendon. Foot Ankle, 13(2): 70–79, Feb.1992.
. KoglerG.F.SolomonidisS.E.PaulJ.P.: Biomechanics of Longitudinal Arch Support Mechanisms in Foot Orthoses and Their Effect on Plantar Aponeurosis Strain. Clin Biomech, 11(5): 243–252, 1996.
23.
. LandorfK.B.KeenanA.-M.: Efficacy of Foot Orthoses: What Does the Literature Tell Us?J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 90(3): 159–158, March 2000.
24.
. LundbergA.SvenssonO.K.NemethG.SelvikG.: The Axis of Rotation of the Ankle Joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am71-B(1): 94–99, 1989.
25.
. LundbergA.SvenssonO.K.BylundC.GoldieI.SelvikG.: Kinematics of the Ankle/Foot Complex-Part 2: Pronation and Supination. Foot Ankle Int, 9(5): 248–253, April1989.
. MannR.A.ThompsonF.M.: Rupture of the Posterior Tibial Tendon Causing Flat Foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 67A(1): 556–561, April1985.
28.
. MarcusR.E.GoodfellowD.B.PfisterM.E.: The Difficult Diagnosis of Posterior Tibialis Tendon Rupture In Sports Injuries. Orthopedics, 18(8): 715–721, August1995.
29.
. McCormackA.P.NikiH.KiserP.TencerA.F.SangeorzanB.J.: Two Reconstructive Techniques for Flatfoot Deformity Comparing Contact Characteristics of the Hindfoot Joints. Foot Ankle Int, 19(7): 452–460, July1998.
30.
. McPoilT.G.CornwallM.W.: The Effect of Foot Orthoses on Transverse Tibial Rotation During Walking. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 90(1): 2–11, January2000.
31.
. MeredayC.DolanC.M.E.LusskinR.: Evaluation of the University of California Biomechanics Laboratory Shoe Insert in the Treatment of “Flexible” Pes Planus. Clin Orthop, 82: 45–58, 1972.
32.
. MyersonM.S.: Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity: Treatment of Dysfunction of the Posterior Tibial Tendon. Instructional Course Lectures, 46: 393–405, 1997.
33.
. PetersonK.S.: Advice to Help Keep You Stepping Lively. USA Today, June 20, 1994, p.4D.
34.
. RedmondA.LumbP.S.B.LandorfK.: Effect of Cast and Noncast Foot Orthoses on Plantar Pressure and Force During Normal Gait. 90(9): 441–449, October,2000.
35.
. SangeorzanB.J.MoscaV.HansenS.T.: Effect of Calcaneal Lengthening on Relationships among the Hindfoot, Midfoot and Forefoot. Foot Ankle, 14(3): 137–141, 1993.
36.
. SferraJ.J.RosenbergG.A.: Adult Flatfoot: Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction—Nonoperative Treatment of Posterior Tibial Tendon Pathology. Foot and Ankle Clinics, 2(2):261–273, June1997.
37.
. SieglerS.ChenJ.SchneckC.D.: The Effect of Damage to the Lateral Collateral Ligaments on the Mechanical Characteristics of the Ankle Joint-An In-Vitro Study. J Biomech Eng, 112: 129–137, May1990.
38.
. SieglerS.ChenJ.SchneckC.D.: The Three-Dimensional Kinematics and Flexibility Characteristics of the Ankle and Subtalar Joints-Part 1: Kinematics. J Biomech Eng, 110: 364–373, November1988.
39.
. SieglerS.WangD.PlashaE.BermanA.T.: Technique for In Vivo Measurement of the Three-Dimensional Kinematics and Laxity Characteristics of the Ankle Joint Complex. J Orthop Res, 12(3): 421–431, 1994.
40.
. SieglerSWenLSennettBNobiliniR.J.DunbarD.: The Three-Dimensional Passive Support Characteristics of Ankle Braces. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 26(6): 299–309, 1997.
41.
. SimkinA.: Structural Analysis of the Human Foot in Standing Posture, 1982, Tel-Aviv University: Tel-Aviv.
42.
. SobelE.LevitzS.J.CaselliM.A.: Orthoses in the Treatment of Rearfoot Problems. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 89(5): 220–233, May,1999.
43.
. StiehlJ.B., ed.: Inman's Joints of the Ankle. 2nd ed.1991, Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore.
