A major argument for upward harmonization of national industrial pollution standards is that unregulated trade competition among countries with wide disparities in standards will exert downward pressure on standards, particularly in the countries with the most stringent standards (the “race to bottom” thesis). But empirical evidence indicates that it is in the rapidly industrializing countries themselves, rather than in the countries with higher standards, that competitiveness concerns exert downward pressure on standards, creating a “stuck at the bottom” problem. The greater sensitivity of rapidly industrializing countries to competitiveness pressures can be explained by the unresponsiveness of their political institutions. This article calls for a radically different approach to the problem of standards and trade competition, proposing an agreement on common minimum standards to be negotiated solely among the rapidly industrializing countries themselves.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, K. (1995). The entwining of trade policy with environmental and labour standards. In W. Martin & L. A. Winters (Eds.), The Uruguay round and the developing economies (pp. 435-456). Washington, DC: World Bank.
2.
Arden-Clarke, C. (1993). Environment, competitiveness and countervailing measures. In Environmental policies and industrial competitiveness (pp. 150-157). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
3.
Atkinson, R. D. (1996). International differences in environmental compliance costs and United States manufacturing competitiveness. International Environmental Affairs, 8, 128-128.
4.
Bachner, B. (1993). Coming home to roost: Pollution, law and economics in the People's Republic of China. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 5, 635-649.
5.
Baumol, W. T., & Oates, W. E. (1975). The theory of environmental policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
Beghin, J., Roland-Holst, D., & van der Mensbrugghe, D. (1994). A survey of the trade and environment nexus: Global dimensions. OECD Economic Studies, 23, 167-192.
7.
Bernstein, J. D. (1993). Alternative approaches to pollution control and waste management: Regulatory and economic instruments. Washington, DC: World Bank.
8.
Bhagwati, J., & Srinivasan, T. N. (1996). Trade and the environment: Does environmental diversity detract from the case for free trade? In J. Bhagwati & R. Hudec (Eds.), Fair trade and harmonization: Prerequisites for free trade? (Vol. 2, pp. 159-224). Cambridge: MIT Press.
9.
Birdsall, N., & Wheeler, D. (1992). Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: Where are the pollution havens? In P. Low (Ed.), International trade and the environment(pp. 159-168). Washington, DC: World Bank.
10.
Bowie, A. (1994). The dynamics of business-government relations in industrializing Malaysia. In A. MacIntyre (Ed.), Business and government in industrializing Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11.
Bradley, C. (1991). 1992: The case of financial services. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 12, 124-124.
12.
Brueckner, J., & Saavedra, L. (1998). Do local governments engage in strategic property-tax competition? Unpublished manuscript.
13.
Bruestle, A. (1993). East Asia's urban environment. Environmental Science and Technology, 27, 2280-2280.
14.
Budiman, A. (1988). The emergence of the bureaucratic capitalist state in Indonesia. In L. T. Ghee (Ed.), Reflections on development in Southeast Asia (pp. 110-127). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
15.
Campbell, L. (1994). International environmental standards: Their role in mutual recognition of ecolabelling schemes. Geneva: United Nations Environment Program.
16.
Casey-Lefkowitz, C. (1997). A comparative look at the role of citizens in environmental enforcement. National Environmental Enforcement Journal, 12, 29-44.
17.
Casey-Lefkowtiz, C., Futrell, S., Austen, J. W., & Bass, S. (1996). The evolving role of citizens in environmental enforcement. In J. Gerardu & C. Wasserman (Eds.), Fourth International Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, April 22-26, 1996, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
18.
Chi, C. (1994). Growth with pollution: Unsustainable development in Taiwan and its consequences. Studies in Comparative International Development, 29, 23-44.
19.
Chu, Y. (1994). The realignment of business-government relations and regime transition in Taiwan. In A. MacIntyre (Ed.), Business and government in industrializing Asia(pp. 113-141). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
Daniels, R. J. (1991). Shall Provinces Compete? The Case for a Competitive Corporate Law Market. McGill Law Journal, 36, 130-190.
21.
Esty, D. (1994). Greening the GATT. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
22.
Esty, D. (1996). Revitalizing Environmental Federalism. Michigan Law Review, 95, 570-653.
23.
Gadgil, M., & Ramachandra, G. (1995). Ecology and equity: The use and abuse of nature in contemporary India. London and New York: Routledge.
24.
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. (1991). International Trade 90-91. Geneva: Author.
25.
Goodstein, E. (1996, December). Why no pollution havens? US net export performance and environmental regulation. Paper presented at the Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DC.
26.
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. In P. Garber, (Ed.), The U.S.-Mexico free trade agreement. Cambridge: MIT Press.
27.
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 40, 353-377.
28.
Guang, X. (1997). An estimate of the economic consequences of environmental pollution in China. Beijing: Policy Research Center of the National Environmental Protection Agency.
29.
Haigh, N. (1987). EEC environmental policy and Britain. London: Longman.
30.
Heerings, H. (1993). The role of environmental policies in influencing patterns of investments of transnational corporations: Case study of the phosphate fertilizer industry. In OECD, environmental policies and industrial competitiveness (pp. 113-119). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
31.
Hertsgaard, M. (1997). Our real China problem. The Atlantic Monthly, 280, 97-114.
32.
Hettige, H., Huq, S., Pargal, S., & Wheeler, D. (1996). Determinants of pollution abatement in developing countries: Evidence from South and Southeast Asia. World Development, 24, 1891-1904.
33.
Hettige, H., Lucas, R.E.B., & Wheeler, D. (1992). The toxic intensity of industrial production: Global patterns, trends and trade policy. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings, 82, 478-481.
34.
Hutchcroft, P. (1994). Botty capitalism: Business-government relations in the Philippines. In A. MacIntyre (Ed.), Business and government in industrializing Asia (pp. 216-244). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R., & Stavins, R. N. (1994). Environmental Regulation and International Competitiveness: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
36.
Joseph, T. (1996). European environmental regulation: Resolving differences between member states' environmental standards and enforcement levels. Draft paper for the Global Environment and Trade Study, Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy.
37.
Kalt, J. (1988). The impact of domestic regulatory policies on US international competitiveness. In A. M. Spence & H. A. Hazard (Eds.), International competitiveness (pp. 221-262). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
38.
Kanbur, R., Keen, M., & van Wijnbergen, S. (1995). Industrial competitiveness, environmental regulation and direct foreign investment. In I. Goldin & A. L. Winters (Eds.), The economics of sustainable development (pp. 289-302). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Klevorick, A. (1996). Reflections on the race to the bottom. In J. Bhagwati & R. Hudec (Eds.), Fair trade and harmonization: Prerequisites for free trade? (Vol. 2, pp. 459-468). Cambridge: MIT Press.
40.
Kwan, C. H. (1994). Economic interdependence in the Asia-Pacific region. London and New York: Routledge.
41.
Laothamatas, A. (1994). From clientelism to partnership. In A. MacIntyre (Ed.), Business and government in industrializing Asia (pp. 195-215). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42.
Lomas, O. (1988). Environmental protection, environmental conflict and the European Community. McGill Law Journal, 33, 507-539.
43.
Low, P., & Yeats, A. (1992). Do dirty industries migrate? In P. Low (Ed.), International trade and the environment (pp. 89-104). Washington, DC: World Bank.
44.
Moon, C. (1994). Changing patterns of business-government relations in South Korea. In A. MacIntyre (Ed.), Business and government in industrializing Asia (pp. 142-166). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
45.
Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1988). Economic competition among jurisdictions: Efficiency enhancing or distortion inducing?Journal of Public Economics, 35, 333-354.
46.
O'Connor, D. (1992). Managing the environment in developing countries. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
47.
O'Connor, D. (1994). Managing the environment with rapid industrialization. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
48.
O'Connor, D. (1996). Grow now/clean later, or the pursue of sustainable development?Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
49.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1995). Report on trade and environment to the OECD council at ministerial level. Paris: Author.
50.
Pargal, S., & Wheeler, D. (1996). Informal regulation of industrial pollution in developing countries: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 1314-1326.
51.
Pethig, R. (1996). Non-cooperative national environmental policies and capital mobility. In J. B. Braden, H. Folmer, & T. S. Ulen (Eds.), Environmental policy with political and economic integration: The European Union and the United States (pp. 175-204). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
52.
Plofchan, Jr., T. K. (1992). Recognizing and countervailing environmental subsidies. International Law, 26, 763-780.
53.
Porter, G. (1998). Pollution standards and trade: The “environmental assimilative capacity” argument. Georgetown Public Policy Review, 4, 49-74.
54.
Radetzki, M. (1992). Economic growth and the environment. In P. Low (Ed.), International trade and the environment. Washington, DC: World Bank.
55.
Revesz, R. (1992). Rehabilitating interstate competition: Rethinking the “race to the bottom” rational for federal environmental regulation. New York University Law Review, 67, 1210-1210.
56.
Robison, D. (1988). Industrial pollution abatement: The impact on the balance of trade. Canadian Journal of Economics, 21, 69-82.
57.
Rosencranz, A., & Yurchak, K. D. (1996). Progress on the environmental front: The regulation of industry and development in India. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 19, 489-489.
58.
Ruishu, L., Xia, Y., Li, J., Zhang, J., & Lu, Y. (1993). A study on environmental protection and foreign trade development in China. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development/United Nations Development Program (UNCTAD/UNDP) Project on Reconciliation of Environment and Trade Policies.
59.
Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets cure for air pollution emissions?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 147-162.
60.
Shinn, D. (1993). Economic growth and environmental problems in South Korea: The role of the government. In M. C. Howard (Ed.), Asia's environmental crisis (pp. 235-253), Boulder, CO: Westview.
61.
Sorsa, P. (1992). GATT and environment: Basic issues and some developing country concerns. In P. Low (Ed.), International trade and the environment (pp. 325-340), Washington, DC: World Bank.
62.
Sorsa, P. (1994). Competitiveness and environmental standards: Some exploratory results (World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 1249). Washington, DC: World Bank.
63.
Stern, D., Common, M. S., & Barbier, E. B. (1996). Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development, 24, 1158-1158.
64.
Stevens, C. (1993). Do environmental policies affect competitiveness?The OECD Observer, 183, 22-25.
65.
Stewart, R. B. (1993). Environmental regulation and international competitiveness. The Yale Law Journal, 102, 2039-2106.
66.
Tang, S., & Tang, C. (1997). Democratization and environmental politics in Taiwan. Asian Survey, 37, 281-294.
67.
Tait, A. N., & Li, K. (1997). Trade regimes and China's accession to the World Trade Organization. Journal of World Trade, 31, 93-103.
68.
Thai environment report agrees on new ambient standards. (1995, January 19). Daily Environment Report, p. B3-B3.
69.
Tobey, J. A. (1990). The effects of domestic environment policies on patterns of world trade: An empirical test. Kyklos, 43, 191-209.
70.
Tyler, P. (1994, September 25). A tide of pollution threatens China's prosperity. The New York Times, 3-3.
71.
United National Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (1995). Environment, international competitiveness and development: Lessons from empirical studies. Geneva: UNCTAD Trade and Development Board, Ad Hoc Working Group on Trade, Environment and Development [TD/B/WG.6/10].
72.
United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (UNCSD). (1995). Decisions and recommendations adopted by the third session of the Commission for Sustainable Development, New York, 11-28 April. New York: Author.
73.
Urquidi, V. (1995, September). Economic and regulatory policy instruments in developing countries with special reference to Mexico. Paper presented at the Pacific Trade and Development Conference, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
74.
von Amsberg, J. (1998). Policy approaches to promote cleaner production in Argentina, Brazil and Chile [On-line]. Available: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/vonamsberg/oecdw.htm.
75.
Warford, J., Munashinghe, M., & Cruz, W. (1991). The greening of economic policy reform: Vol. 1, Principles. Washington, DC: World Bank.
76.
Weyland, K. (1996). Democracy without equity. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
77.
Wilson, J. (1996). Capital mobility and environmental standards: Is there a theoretical basis for a race to the bottom? In J. Bhagwati & R. Hudec (Eds.), Fair trade and harmonization: Prerequisites for free trade?Cambridge: MIT Press.
78.
World Bank. (1989). Philippines: Environment and natural resource management study. Washington, DC: Author.
79.
World Bank. (1994). Indonesia: Environment and development. Washington, DC: Author.
80.
Worth, N. (1992). Harmonizing capital adequacy rules for international banks and securities firms. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 18, 133-133.
81.
Yang, C., Wang, J., Chan, C., Chen, P., Huang, J., & Cheng, M. (1997). Respiratory and irritant health effects of a population living in a petrochemical-polluted area in Taiwan. Environmental Research, 74, 145-149.
82.
You, J. (1995). The Korean model of development and its environmental implications. In V. Bhaskar & A. Glyn (Eds.), The North, the South and the environment: Ecological constraints and the global economy. New York: St. Martin's.
