This article shows that some commonly advocated methodological principles
of modern political science are inapprapriate for the study of complex ecological-political systems. It also provides conceptual tools for thinking about the causal
roles of environmental and demographic factors, and it discusses various
strategies for hypothesis and inference testing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beauchamp, T., & Rosenberg, A. (1981). Hume and the problem of causation.New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Broecker, W. (1987). Unpleasant surprises in the greenhouse?Nature, 328(6126),123-126.
3.
Chen, R., & Fiering, M. (1989). Climate change in the context of multiple environmental threats (Research Report RR-89-1Providence, RI: Brown University, World Hunger Program.
4.
Dessler, D. (1992, April). The architecture of causal analysis.Paper presented at the Seminar for Philosophy and Methodology of the Social Sciences, Center for International Affairs, Harvard University
5.
Dessler, D. (1994). How to sort causes in the study of environmental change and violent conflict In N. Graeger & D. Smith (Eds.), Environment, poverty, conflict (PRIO Report 02/94; pp. 91-112). Oslo, Norway: International Peace Research Institute .
6.
Diesing, R. (1991). How does social science work? Reflections on practice.Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
7.
Dion, D. (1994). Evidence and inference in the comparative case study Unpublished draft paper, Department of Political Science, University of Michigan.
8.
Eckstein, H. (1975). Case study and theory in political science In F. Greenstein & N. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science, Vol. 1, Political science: Scope and theory (pp. 79-133). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
9.
Fearon, J. (1991). Counterfactuals and hypothesis testing in political scienceWorld Politics, 43(2),169-195.
10.
Fodor, J. (1975). Introduction: Two kinds of reductionism. In The language of thought (pp. 1-26). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Geddes, B. (1990). How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics In J. Stimson (Ed.), Political analysis: An annual publication of the Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Vol. 2 (pp. 131-150). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
12.
George, A., & McKeown, T. (1985). Case studies and theories of organizational decision making In R. Coulam & R. Smith (Eds.), Advances in information processing in organizations, Vol. 2 (pp. 21-58). London: JAI.
13.
Goertz, G. (1994). Contexts of international politics.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
14.
Goldstone, J. (1991). Revolution and rebellion in the early modern world.Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Hempel, C. (1965). Aspects of scientific exploration.New York: Free Press.
16.
Holdren, J. (1991). Population and the energy problemPopulation and Environment, 12(3), 231-255.
17.
Homer-Dixon, T. (1991). On the threshold: Environmental changes as causes of environmental conflictInternational Security , 16(2), 76-116.
18.
Homer-Dixon, T. (1994). Environmental scarcities and violent conflict: Evidence from casesInternational Security , 19(1), 5-40.
19.
Humphreys, R. (1989). The chances of explanation: Causal explanation in the social, medical, and physical sciences.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry.San Francisco: Chandler.
21.
King, G., Keohane, R., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
Levy, M. (1995). Is the environment a national security issue?International Security, 20(2), 35-62.
23.
Ludwig, D., Hilborn, R., & Walters, C. (1993). Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: Lessons from historyScience, 260(5104), 17, 36.
24.
Mill, J.S. (1859). System of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive.New York: Harper.
25.
Most, B., & Starr, H. (1989). Inquiry and international politics.Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
26.
Quine, W.Van Orman (1953). Two dogmas of empiricism. From a logical point of view : Nine logico-philosophical essays (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies.Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
Rosenberg, A. (1980). Obstacles to the nomological connection of reasons and actionsPhilosophy of Social Sciences , 10, 79-91.
29.
Salmon, W. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Schiffer, S. (1991). Ceteris Paribus LaesMind , 100(397), 1-17.
31.
Smil, V. (1993). Global ecology: Environmental change and social f lexibility.London: Routledge .
32.
Smil, V. (1994). Some contrarian notes on environmental threats to national securityCanadian Foreign Policy , 2(2), 85-87.
33.
Sober, E. (1988). Apportioning causal responsibilityThe Journal of Philosuphy, 85(6), 303-318.
34.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Van Inwagen, P. (1980). Time and cause: Essays presented to Richard TaylorDordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
36.
Wallensteen, P. (1986). Food crops as a factor in strategic policy and action In A. Westing (Ed.), Global resources and international conflict: Environmental factors in strategic policy and action (pp. 154-155). New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
Westing, A. (Ed.). (1986). Global resources and international conflict: Environmental factors in strategic policy and action.New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Wiman, B. (1991, June). Implications of environmental complexity for science and policyGlobal Environmental Change , 235-247.
