Rapid urbanization in rural Vietnam is reshaping spatial structures, livelihoods, and cultural landscapes. This study examines these transformations through a case study of Dai Loc District, Quang Nam Province, using household surveys and interviews. The findings highlight three intersecting challenges: displacement of traditional livelihoods, erosion of cultural-spatial memory, and rising environmental stress from unregulated industrial growth. In response, the paper proposes the 3C Framework for Rural Redevelopment and Modernization, organized around three strategic pillars: livelihood connectivity through vocational realignment, cultural-spatial continuity in planning, and eco-industrial coordination to strengthen environmental resilience. These pillars rest on principles of adaptive livelihoods, community-based development, and ecological integration. The framework advances shifts toward participatory planning, long-term livelihood support, and context-sensitive development. Positioned as both an analytical lens and a policy-oriented guide, the 3C Framework offers practical directions for strengthening rural resilience under accelerating modernization and calls for more inclusive, balanced, and culturally grounded planning approaches.
AdebayoT. S.AlolaA. A.UllahS.AbbasS. (2024). The growth impacts of agriculture value‐added, energy utilization, and environmental degradation in Pakistan: Causality in continuous wavelet transform approach. In Natural Resources Forum (Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 343–363). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
BankW. (2016). Transforming Vietnamese agriculture: Gaining more for less. World Bank.
4.
BoissauS.CastellaJ.-C. (2003). Constructing a common representation of local institutions and land use systems through simulation-gaming and multiagent modeling in rural areas of Northern Vietnam: The SAMBA-week methodology. Simulation & Gaming, 34(3), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878103255789
5.
BruunO. (2020). Environmental protection in the hands of the state: Authoritarian environmentalism and popular perceptions in Vietnam. The Journal of Environment & Development, 29(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496520905625
BrydenJ. M.HartK. (2004). A new approach to rural development in Europe: Germany, Greece, Scotland, and Sweden. E. Mellen Press Lewiston.
8.
CampbellH. W.ChristmanS. P. (1982). Field techniques for herpetofaunal community analysis. Herpetological Communities, (13-15),, 181–193.
9.
CastellaJ.-C.TrungT. N.BoissauS. (2005). Participatory simulation of land-use changes in the northern mountains of Vietnam: The combined use of an agent-based model, a role-playing game, and a geographic information system. Ecology and Society, 10(1), art27. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-01328-100127
10.
ChambersR. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd.
11.
ChambersR.ConwayG. (1991). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper 296, Brighton: IDS.
12.
CrostaN.DaviesA.MaguireK. (2006). The new rural paradigm: Policies and governance. OECD Publishing.
13.
CummingG. S. (2011). Spatial resilience in social-ecological systems. Springer Science & Business Media.
14.
DangT. D.TranT. A. (2020). Rural industrialization and environmental governance challenges in the Red River Delta, Vietnam. The Journal of Environment & Development, 29(4), 420–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496520942564
DavoudiS.ShawK.HaiderL. J.QuinlanA. E.PetersonG. D.WilkinsonC.FünfgeldH.McEvoyD.PorterL. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? “Reframing” resilience: Challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: Resilience assessment of a pasture management system in Northern Afghanistan urban resilience: What does it mean in planning practice? Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? The politics of resilience for planning: A cautionary note: Edited by Simin Davoudi and Libby Porter. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
17.
EllisF. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press.
FanP.OuyangZ.NguyenD. D.NguyenT. T. H.ParkH.ChenJ. (2019). Urbanization, economic development, environmental and social changes in transitional economies: Vietnam after Doimoi. Landscape and Urban Planning, 187, 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.014
FortierF.Thi Thu TrangT. (2013). Agricultural modernization and climate change in Vietnam’s post‐socialist transition. Development and Change, 44(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12001
GibbsD. (2003). Trust and networking in inter-firm relations: The case of eco-industrial development. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 18(3), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269094032000114595
24.
GilesJ.GrosjeanG.Le CoqJ.-F.HuberB.BuiV. L.LäderachP. (2021). Barriers to implementing climate policies in agriculture: A case study from Viet Nam. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, Article 439881. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.439881
25.
GuoY.LiS. (2024). A policy analysis of China’s sustainable rural revitalization: Integrating environmental, social and economic dimensions. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, Article 1436869. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1436869
26.
GustafsonP. (2001). Meanings of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0185
27.
HaT. M.BoschO. J.NguyenN. C.TrinhC. T. (2017). System dynamics modelling for defining livelihood strategies for women smallholder farmers in lowland and upland regions of northern Vietnam: A comparative analysis. Agricultural Systems, 150, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.008
28.
HayN.Van KienP. (2022). Building new rural areas in Vietnam. In Sustainable rural development perspective and global challenges. IntechOpen.
29.
HuyenP. T. T.GiangP. Q. (2024). Agricultural land use in Vietnam in the context of urbanization: Status and policy implications. Environmental & Socio-Economic Studies, 12(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2024-0005
30.
KerkvlietB. J. T.SeldenM. (1998). Agrarian transformations in China and Vietnam. The China Journal, 40, 37–58.
31.
KimDungN.BushS. R.MolA. P. (2016). NGOs as bridging organizations in managing nature protection in Vietnam. The Journal of Environment & Development, 25(2), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496516642499
32.
LeC. Q.DaravongS.DuongN. Q.TranT. Q.VongpraseuthT. (2025). Urbanization and its impact on the livelihood of agricultural villagers on the fringe of Hanoi City, Vietnam. International Journal of Humanities Education, 13(1).
33.
LêV. T. (2022). Quyết định số 326/QĐ-TTg ngày 09/3/2022: Phê duyệt Quy hoạch sử dụng đất quốc gia thời kỳ 2021–2030, tầm nhìn đến năm 2050. Thủ tướng Chính phủ. https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&docid=205446
34.
LewickaM. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
35.
LongH.LiuY. (2016). Rural restructuring in China. (Vol. 47, pp. 387–391). Elsevier.
36.
LongH.LiuY.HouX.LiT.LiY. (2014). Effects of land use transitions due to rapid urbanization on ecosystem services: Implications for urban planning in the new developing area of China. Habitat International, 44, 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.011
37.
MarsdenT. (2003). The condition of rural sustainability. Royal Van Gorcum.
38.
MarsdenT. (2017). The condition of rural sustainability: Issues in the governance of rural space in Europe. In The reform of the CAP and rural development in Southern Europe (pp. 19–37). Routledge.
39.
McGeeT. G. (2008). Managing the rural–urban transformation in East Asia in the 21st century. Sustainability Science, 3(1), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-007-0040-y
40.
MeyfroidtP.RudelT. K.LambinE. F. (2010). Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(49), 20917–20922. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014773107
41.
NavarroF. A.WoodsM.CejudoE. (2016). The LEADER initiative has been a victim of its own success. The decline of the bottom‐up approach in rural development programmes. The cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(2), 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12079
42.
NguyenT. A.GillenJ.RiggJ. (2020). Economic transition without agrarian transformation: The pivotal place of smallholder rice farming in Vietnam's modernisation. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.12.008
43.
NguyenT. B. N.NguyenP. Q. (2020). The new rural area program in Vietnam from the sense of place theory perspective: Case of Quang Nam Province. International Journal of Conservation Science, 11(2), 601–614.
44.
Nguyen QuangP. (2015). Urban land grab or fair urbanization? Compulsory land acquisition and sustainable livelihoods in Hue, Vietnam. Utrecht University.
45.
Nguyen Thi MinhD. (2023). Agricultural Transformation Towards Urbanization: A Study of the Peri-Urban Area in Da Lat City, Vietnam. In Urban transformational landscapes in the city-hinterlands of Asia: Challenges and approaches (pp. 305–323). Springer.
OsmanB. M.ShireS. A.AliF. H.MohamedA. A. (2025). Examining the drivers of environmental degradation in Somalia: The role of agriculture, economic and population growth. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00786-2
48.
Pham ThiN.KappasM.FaustH. (2021). Impacts of agricultural land acquisition for urbanization on agricultural activities of affected households: A case study in Huong Thuy Town, Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam. Sustainability, 13(15), 8559. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158559
Prime Minister of Vietnam. (2020). Decision No. 1804/QD-TTg approving the Program for Supporting the Development of the Collective Economy and Cooperatives for the period 2021–2025 (November 13, 2020). https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/default.aspx?pageid=27160&docid=201565
51.
Prime Minister of Vietnam. (2022). Decision No. 318/QD-TTg issuing the national criteria set for new-style rural communes and advanced new-style rural communes forthe 2021–2025 period (March 8, 2022). https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&docid=205441.
ScoonesI. (2013). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. In Critical perspectives in rural development studies (pp. 159–184). Routledge.
54.
ScoonesI. (2015). Sustainable rural livelihoods and rural development. Fernwood Publishing.
55.
SolesburyW. (2003) Sustainable livelihoods: a case study of the evolution of DFID policy (Vol. 217). Overseas Development Institute.
56.
TambeS. (2022). Sustainable livelihoods approach. In Teaching and learning rural livelihoods: A guide for educators, students, and practitioners (pp. 45–56). Springer.
TuanN. T.HegedűsG. (2022). Urbanization and post-acquisition livelihood in a peri-urban context in Vietnam: A geographical comparison between Hanoi, Danang, and Vinh City. Land, 11(10), 1787. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101787
59.
Van der PloegJ. D.RentingH.BrunoriG.KnickeiK.MannionJ.MarsdenT.De RoestK.Sevilla-GuzmánE.VenturaF. (2017). Rural development: From practices and policies towards theory. In The rural (pp. 201–218). Routledge.
WoodsM.McDonaghJ. (2011). Rural Europe and the world: Globalization and rural development. European Countryside, 3(3), 153. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-012-0001-z
63.
ZhangY.ZhengH.ChenB.SuM.LiuG. (2015). A review of industrial symbiosis research: Theory and methodology. Frontiers of Earth Science, 9(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-014-0445-8
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
