The exploitation of forest resources for human activities significantly contributes to forest degradation and increases carbon emissions. Forests play a crucial role in capturing the carbon released into the atmosphere, thereby reducing air pollution. However, when forests are degraded, leading to higher carbon emissions, countries must implement reforestation programs through afforestation, reforestation, and agroforestry. Green finance, therefore, has become a central means for these countries to carry out such initiatives to sequester carbon. The objective of this study is to analyze the role of green finance in moderating the effect of deforestation on decarbonization in sub-Saharan Africa. Using data collected from 44 sub-Saharan countries and the FMOLS and System GMM methods, the outcomes suggest that green finance mitigates the impact of deforestation on carbon emissions. Consequently, policies aimed at establishing monitoring bodies could enhance the effective utilization of these funds for decarbonization purposes.
AjanakuB. A.CollinsA. R. (2021). Economic growth and deforestation in African countries: Is the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis applicable?Forest Policy and Economics, 129(1), Article 102488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102488
2.
AkpankeT. A.DekaA.OzdeserH.SerajM. (2023). The role forest resources, energy efficiency, and renewable energy in promoting environmental quality. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(9), 1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11617-8
Al MamunMDBoubakerS.NguyenD. K. (2022). Green finance and decarbonization: Evidence from around the world. Finance Research Letters, 46(Part B), Article 102807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102807
5.
AnochiwaL. I.AgbanikeT. F.ChukwuA. B.IkpeM.OttaN. N. (2022). Urbanization and carbon emissions: Looking at the role of mobile phone adoption in Sub-Saharan African countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(52), 78526–78541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20994-5
6.
ArellanoM.BoverS. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
7.
AsonguS. A.OdhiamboN. M. (2020). How enhancing gender inclusion affects inequality: thresholds of complementary policies for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 28(1), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1977
8.
BennisL. (2023). Green finance in Marocco: Challenges and perspectives in the era of climate change. Revue Francaise d’économie et de Gestion, 4(4), 29–61. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7800132
9.
BlundellR.BondS. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
10.
CaravaggioN. (2020). A global empirical re-assessment of the Environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation. Forest Policy and Economics, 119(1), Article 102282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102282
11.
CaryM.BekunF. V. (2021). Democracy and deforestation: The role of spillover effects. Forest Policy and Economics, 125(1), Article 102398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102398
12.
ChowdhuryT.DattaR.MohajanH. (2013). Green finance is essential for economic development and sustainability. International Journal Of Research In Commerce, Economics & Management, 3(1), 104–108. https://ijrcm.org.in/
13.
ÇitilM.İlbasmışM.OlanrewajuV. O.BarutA.KaraoğlanS.AliM. (2023). Does green finance and institutional quality play an important role in air quality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(18), 53962–53976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26016-2
14.
CopelandB. R.TaylorM. S. (1994). North-South Trade and the Environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 755–787. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118421
15.
De HoyosR. E.SarafidisV. (2006). Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. The Stata Journal, 6(4), 482–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0600600403
16.
DukuC.HeinL. (2021). The impact of deforestation on rainfall in Africa: A data-driven assessment. Environmental Research Letters, 16(6), Article 064044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfcfb
17.
EdquistH.BergmarkP. (2024). How is mobile broadband intensity affecting CO2 emissions? A macro analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 48(2), Article 102668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102668
18.
EllisonD.LocatelliB.SheilD.CohenJ.MurdiyarsoD.GutierrezV.NoordwijkM. v.CreedI. F.PokornyJ.GaveauD.SpracklenD. V.TobellaA. B.IlstedtU.TeulingA. J.GebrehiwotS. G.SandsD. C.MuysB.VerbistB.SullivanC. A.LocatelliB. (2017). Trees, forests and water: Cool insights for a hot world. Global Environmental Change, 43(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.01.002
19.
Engwali FonD.Ongo NkoaB. E.Messie PondieT. M. (2023). Effet de la deforestation sur le changement climatique en Afrique subsaharienne (ASS): la finance verte importe-t-elle. In Economie et développement(Vol. 219, pp. 416–448). Collection Dynamique Economique et Développement.
20.
FAO. (2021). La situation des forêts dans le monde. Rapport de FAO.
GianfrateG.PeriM. (2019). The green advantage: Exploring the convenience of issuing green bonds. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219(1), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.022
24.
GlomsrødS.WeiT. (2018). Business as unusual: The implications of fossil divestment and green bonds for financial flows, economic growth and energy market. Energy for Sustainable Development, 44(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.02.005
GuertinM. A.Poirier-GhysG.ReedM. G.DuprasJ. (2019). L’éducation relative à l’environnement dans la Réserve de biosphère du mont Saint Hilaire: observations et tensions. Éducation relative à l'environnement, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4000/ere.3810
29.
Hamit-HaggarM. (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: A panel cointegration analysis from Canadian industrial sector perspective. Energy Economics, 34(1), 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.06.005
HurlinC.MignonV. (2007). Une Synthèse des Tests de Cointégration sur Données de Panel. Economie et Prevision, 180-181(4-5), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.2007.7683
KhanM. (2020). CO2 emissions and sustainable economic development: New evidence on the role of human capital. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1279–1288. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2083
34.
KongX.GhaffarS.DetermannM.FrieseK.JomaaS.MiC.ShatwellT.RinkeK.RodeM. (2022). Reservoir water quality deterioration due to deforestation emphasizes the indirect effects of global change. Water Research, 221(1), Article 118721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118721
35.
KudratovaS.HuangX.ZhouX. (2018). Sustainable project selection: Optimal project selection considering sustainability under reinvestment strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.259
LiK.CuiG.LuL. (2020). Efficient estimation of heterogeneous coefficients in panel data models with common shocks. Journal of Econometrics, 206(2), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.08.011
38.
LimazieM. S.WoniS. (2024). Foreign direct investment and carbon emissions in ECOWAS: Does good governance matter?Journal of Economics and Development, 26(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-08-2023-0158
39.
LiuA.ImranM.NassaniA. A.BinsaeedR. H.ZamanK. (2024). Reducing carbon emissions with Geoscience solutions: A look at the contributions of nuclear energy, technology, and green finance. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(4), Article 101698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101698
40.
LiuJ.LiM.DingY. (2021). Econometric analysis of the impact of the urban population size on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(12), 18186–18203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01433-w
41.
LiuJ. Y.XiaY.FanY.LinS. M.WuJ. (2017). Assessment of a green credit policy aimed at energy intensive industries in China based on a financial CGE model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163(1), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.111
42.
LiuX.WangE.CaiD. (2019). Green credit policy, property rights and debt financing: Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 29(1), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.014
43.
MahadevanR.SunY. (2020). Effects of foreign direct investment on carbon emissions: Evidence from China and its Belt and Road countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 276(1), Article 111321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111321
44.
MahadevanR.SunY. (2020). Effects of foreign direct investment on carbon emissions: Evidence from China and its Belt and Road countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 276, 111321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111321
45.
MalthusT. R. (1798). An essay on the principle of population. J. Johnson.
46.
NchofoungT. N.AchuoE. D.AsonguS. A. (2021). Resources rents and inclusive human development in developing countries. Resources Policy, 74(1), Article 102382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102382
47.
NchofoungT. N.AsonguS. A. (2022). ICT for sustainable development: Global comparative evidence of globalization thresholds. Telecommunications Policy, 46(5), Article 102296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102296
48.
Németh-DurkóE. (2021). Determinants of carbon emissions in a European emerging country: Evidence from ARDL cointegration and Granger causality analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(5), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1839808
ÖzcanB. (2013). The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: A panel data analysis. Energy Policy, 62, 1138–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.016
51.
PedroniP. (1996). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels and the case of purchasing power parity (Working Paper). Indiana University, Department of Economics.
52.
PedroniP. (2002). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653
53.
PedroniP. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073
54.
PesaranM. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
PhillipsP. C. B.HansenB. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. The Review of Economic Studies, 57(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297545
57.
PoberezhnaA. (2018). Addressing water sustainability with blockchain technology and green finance. In MarkeA. (Ed.), Transforming climate finance and green investment with blockchains. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814447-3.00014-8
58.
RomanoA. A.ScandurraG.CarforaA.FodorM. (2017). Renewable investments: The impact of green policies in developing and developed countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 738–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.024
SadiqM.ChauK. Y.HaN. T. T.PhanT. T. H.NgoT. Q.HuyP. Q. (2024). The impact of green finance, eco-innovation, renewable energy and carbon taxes on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries: Evidence from CS ARDL estimation. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(4), Article 101689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101689
62.
SarkodieS. A.AdamsS.OwusuP. A.LeirvikT.OzturkI. (2020). Mitigating degradation and emissions in China: The role of environmental sustainability, human capital and renewable energy. The Science of the Total Environment, 719(1), Article 137530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137530
63.
SartG.BayarY.DanilinaM.SezginF. H. (2022). Economic freedom, education and CO2 emissions: A causality analysis for EU member states. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 8061. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138061
64.
TangD.ZhongH.ZhangJ.DaiY.BoamahV. (2022). The effect of green finance on the ecological and environmental quality of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), Article 12492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912492
65.
TchamyouV.EdohO. M.AsonguS. (2025). Gender economic inclusion and sustainable development in Africa. International Journal of Social Economics. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-06-2024-0498
66.
TchamyouV. S.ErreygersG.CassimonD. (2019). Inequality, ICT and financial access in Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139(1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.004
67.
Van NoordwijkM.EllisonD. (2019). Rainfall recycling needs to be considered in defining limits to the world’s green water resources. Environmental Science, 116(17), 8102–8103. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903554116
68.
WangJ.XuY. (2021). Internet usage, human capital and CO2 emissions: A global perspective. Sustainability, 13(15), 8268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158268
69.
WangS.ZengJ.HuangY.ShiC.ZhanP. (2018). The effects of urbanization on CO2 emissions in the Pearl River Delta: A comprehensive assessment and panel data analysis. Applied Energy, 228(1), 1693–1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.155
WesterlundJ. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967
72.
ZhanY.WangY.ZhongY. (2023). Effects of green finance and financial innovation on environmental quality: New empirical evidence from China. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(3), Article 2164034. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2164034
73.
ZhangD.MohsinM.Taghizadeh-HesaryF. (2022). Does green finance counteract the climate change mitigation: Asymmetric effect of renewable energy investment and R&D. Energy Economics, 113(1), Article 106183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106183
74.
ZhangY.BawuerjiangR.LuM.LiY.WangK. (2024). Green finance and environmental pollution: Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 84(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2024.08.022
75.
ZhaoJ.ZhaoZ.ZhangH. (2019). The impact of growth, energy and financial development on environmental pollution in China: New evidence from a spatial econometric analysis. Energy Economics, 29(1), Article 104506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104506
76.
ZhouX.TangX.ZhangR. (2020). Impact of green finance on economic development and environmental quality: A study based on provincial panel data from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(16), 19915–19932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08383-2
77.
ZhouY.ZhouJ. (2024). Study on the impact of green finance and environmental regulations on haze pollution in China. Atmosphere, 15(1548), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121548
78.
ZhuX.ZhuS.HuangY.HuangH. (2021). How does green finance affect urban environmental pollution in China—Take haze pollution as an example. Tropical Geography, 41(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003303
