Finance is one of the essential enablers to mitigate climate change and adapt to climate action. The study examines a timeline, scientometric attributes of literature, high-interest research fields, cutting-edge Climate Change and Financial Markets achievements. CiteSpace and R’s Bibliometrix examine Scopus data for bibliometric study. Data show that climate change is hurting finance more since the 2015 Paris Agreement. Chinese and US proactive contributions are significant geographically. Paper and reference citation analysis reveals climate change and financial market clusters. The study findings divide the significant literature into three dimensions of the climate change risk in the financial market. This includes physical risk, transition risk and corporate climate risk disclosure. The study suggests policymakers should focus on a standardized framework for corporate climate risk disclosure and climate policy formation to achieve carbon targets. This article calls for more research. The research will help in understanding existing research and enable future research publication, execution, and dissemination.
AcheampongA. O. (2019). Modelling for insight: Does financial development improve environmental quality?Energy Economics, 83, 156–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2019.06.025
2.
AlkatheryM. A.ChaudhuriK.NasirM. A. (2022). Implications of clean energy, oil and emissions pricing for the GCC energy sector stock. Energy Economics, 112, Article 106119. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2022.106119
3.
AlsaifiK.ElnahassM.SalamaA. (2020a). Carbon disclosure and financial performance: UK environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 711–726. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2426
4.
AlsaifiK.ElnahassM.SalamaA. (2020b). Market responses to firms’ voluntary carbon disclosure: Empirical evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, Article 121377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121377
5.
AndresJ.TautivaD.HuamanJ.Ponce OlivaR. D.PonceR. D.ClO. R. (2022). Trends in research on climate change and organizations: A bibliometric analysis (1999–2021). Management Review Quarterly, 74, 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11301-022-00298-1
6.
AntoniukY. (2023). The effect of climate disclosure on stock market performance: Evidence from Norway. Sustainable Development, 31(2), 1008–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2437
7.
AriaM.CuccurulloC. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2017.08.007
8.
AttenboroughD. (2022). Corporate disclosures on climate change: An empirical analysis of FTSE all-share British fossil fuel producers. European Business Organization Law Review, 23(2), 313–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-022-00246-2
9.
BabikerM. H. (2001). Subglobal climate-change actions and carbon leakage: The implication of international capital flows. Energy Economics, 23(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(00)00065-7
10.
BartolT.BudimirG.Dekleva-SmrekarD.PusnikM.JuznicP. (2014). Assessment of research fields in Scopus and Web of Science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1491–1504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1148-8
11.
BattistonS.DafermosY.MonasteroloI. (2021). Climate risks and financial stability. Journal of Financial Stability, 54, Article 100867. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFS.2021.100867
12.
BeauchampC.CormierD. (2022). Corporate disclosure of CO2 embedded in oil and gas reserves: Stock market assessment in a context of global warming. Managerial Finance, 48(12), 1689–1706. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-12-2021-0596
13.
BhatnagarS.SharmaD. (2022). Evolution of green finance and its enablers: A bibliometric analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 162, Article 112405. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2022.112405
14.
BiesbroekR.CandelJ. J. L. (2020). Mechanisms for policy (dis)integration: Explaining food policy and climate change adaptation policy in The Netherlands. Policy Sciences, 53(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11077-019-09354-2/FIGURES/3
BraaschA.VelteP. (2023). Climate reporting quality following the recommendations of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures: A focus on the German capital market. Sustainable Development, 31(2), 926–940. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2430
18.
BroadstockD. C.ChengL. T. W. (2019). Time-varying relation between black and green bond price benchmarks: Macroeconomic determinants for the first decade. Finance Research Letters, 29, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FRL.2019.02.006
19.
BuschT.HoffmannV. H. (2011). How Hot Is Your Bottom Line? Linking Carbon and Financial Performance. Business & Society, 50(2), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311398780
CallonM.CourtialJ. P.LavilleF. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280/METRICS
22.
CalvinK.DasguptaD.KrinnerG.MukherjiA.ThorneP. W.TrisosC.RomeroJ.AldunceP.BarrettK.BlancoG.CheungW. W. L.ConnorsS.DentonF.Diongue-NiangA.DodmanD.GarschagenM.GedenO.HaywardB.JonesC.HaM. (2023). IPCC, 2023: Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental panel on climate change [core writing team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
23.
CaoY.QiF.CuiH.YuanM. (2023). Knowledge domain and emerging trends of carbon footprint in the field of climate change and energy use: A bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30(13), 35853–35870. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-022-24756-1/FIGURES/12
24.
CarèR.WeberO. (2023). How much finance is in climate finance? A bibliometric review, critiques, and future research directions. Research in International Business and Finance, 64, Article 101886. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2023.101886
25.
ChenC. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/ASI.20317
26.
ChenC. (2016). CiteSpace: A practical guide for mapping scientific literature (Vol. 169). Novinka.
27.
ChenY.GuoK.JiQ.ZhangD. (2023a). “Not all climate risks are alike”: Heterogeneous responses of financial firms to natural disasters in China. Finance Research Letters, 52, Article 103538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103538
28.
ChenZ.ZhangL.WengC. (2023b). Does climate policy uncertainty affect Chinese stock market volatility?International Review of Economics & Finance, 84, 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IREF.2022.11.030
29.
ChoiD.GaoZ.JiangW. (2020). Attention to global warming. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1112–1145. https://doi.org/10.1093/RFS/HHZ086
30.
Diaz-RaineyI.GehrickeS. A.RobertsH.ZhangR. (2021). Trump vs. Paris: The impact of climate policy on U.S. listed oil and gas firm returns and volatility. International Review of Financial Analysis, 76, 101746. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IRFA.2021.101746
31.
DonthuN.KumarS.MukherjeeD.PandeyN.LimW. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
32.
DonthuN.KumarS.PattnaikD. (2020). Forty-five years of journal of business research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2019.10.039
33.
DuK.LiP.YanZ. (2019). Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2019.06.010
34.
EleftheriadisI. M.AnagnostopoulouE. G. (2015). Relationship between corporate climate change disclosures and firm factors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 780–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1845
FahimniaB.SarkisJ.DavarzaniH. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003
38.
FahmyH. (2022). The rise in investors’ awareness of climate risks after the Paris Agreement and the clean energy-oil-technology prices nexus. Energy Economics, 106, 105738. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2021.105738
39.
FangZ.XieJ.PengR.WangS. (2021). Climate finance: Mapping air pollution and finance market in time series. Econometrics, 9(4), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics9040043
40.
FlammerC.ToffelM. W.ViswanathanK. (2021). Shareholder activism and firms’ voluntary disclosure of climate change risks. Strategic Management Journal, 42(10), 1850–1879. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3313
41.
FujiiH.IwataK.KanekoS.ManagiS. (2013). Corporate Environmental and Economic Performance of Japanese Manufacturing Firms: Empirical Study for Sustainable Development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(3), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.1747
42.
GaoY.LiY.WangY. (2023). The dynamic interaction between investor attention and green security market: An empirical study based on Baidu index. China Finance Review International, 13(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-06-2021-0136
GianfrateG.PeriM. (2019). The green advantage: Exploring the convenience of issuing green bonds. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.022
HaqueS.DeeganC.InglisR. (2016). Demand for, and impediments to, the disclosure of information about climate change-related corporate governance practices. Accounting and Business Research, 46(6), 620–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1133276
51.
HouY.WangQ. (2021). A bibliometric study about energy, environment, and climate change. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(26), 34187–34199. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-14059-2/FIGURES/1
52.
HowarthR. B. (2003). Discounting and uncertainty in climate change policy analysis. Land Economics, 79(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147023
53.
HuangH. H.KersteinJ.WangC.WuF. (2022). Firm climate risk, risk management, and bank loan financing. Strategic Management Journal, 43(13), 2849–2880. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMJ.3437
54.
HusainS.SohagK.WuY. (2022). The response of green energy and technology investment to climate policy uncertainty: An application of twin transitions strategy. Technology in Society, 71, Article 102132. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2022.102132
55.
IkeG. N.UsmanO.AlolaA. A.SarkodieS. A. (2020). Environmental quality effects of income, energy prices and trade: The role of renewable energy consumption in G-7 countries. The Science of the Total Environment, 721, 137813. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.137813
IrfanM.ChenZ.AdebayoT. S.Al-FaryanM. A. S. (2022). Socio-economic and technological drivers of sustainability and resources management: Demonstrating the role of information and communications technology and financial development using advanced wavelet coherence approach. Resources Policy, 79, Article 103038. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2022.103038
58.
IslamM. M.ChowdhuryM. A. M.BegumR. A.AmirA. A. (2022). A bibliometric analysis on the research trends of climate change effects on economic vulnerability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(39), 59300–59315. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-022-20028-0/FIGURES/3
59.
JungH.SongC. K. (2023). Managerial perspectives on climate change and stock price crash risk. Finance Research Letters, 51, Article 103410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103410
60.
KajikawaY.OhnoJ.TakedaY.MatsushimaK.KomiyamaH. (2007). Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: An analysis of the citation network. Sustainability Science, 2, 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-007-0027-8/TABLES/3
61.
KamathA. N.ShenoyS. S.Subrahmanya KumarN. (2022). An overview of investor sentiment: Identifying themes, trends, and future direction through bibliometric analysis. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 19(3), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi
KimS. J.AtukerenE.KimH. (2023). Does the market’s reaction to greenhouse gas emissions differ between B2B and B2C? Evidence from South Korea. Finance Research Letters, 53, Article 103640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103640
64.
KouloukouiD.Sant’AnnaÂ. M. O.da Silva GomesS. M.de Oliveira MarinhoM. M.de JongP.KiperstokA.TorresE. A. (2019). Factors influencing the level of environmental disclosures in sustainability reports: Case of climate risk disclosure by Brazilian companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1721
65.
KruegerP.SautnerZ.StarksL. T. (2020). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1067–1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/RFS/HHZ137
66.
KumarS.ManagiS.MatsudaA. (2012). Stock prices of clean energy firms, oil and carbon markets: A vector autoregressive analysis. Energy Economics, 34(1), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2011.03.002
67.
LeeC. C.ChangY. F.WangE. Z. (2022). Crossing the rivers by feeling the stones: The effect of China’s green credit policy on manufacturing firms’ carbon emission intensity. Energy Economics, 116, Article 106413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106413
68.
LeeC. C.LeeC. C. (2022). How does green finance affect green total factor productivity? Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 107, Article 105863. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2022.105863
69.
LeeL.ChowdhuryA.ShubitaM. (2023). Impact of Paris Agreement on financing strategy: Evidence from global FPSO industry. Technological Forecasting and SocialChange, 188, Article 122266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122266
70.
LeeS. Y.ParkY. S.KlassenR. D. (2015). Market responses to firms’ voluntary climate change information disclosure and carbon communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1321
71.
LeiG.LiuF.LiuP.ZhouY.JiaoT.DangY. H. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of forensic entomology trends and perspectives worldwide over the last two decades (1998–2017). Forensic Science International, 295, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORSCIINT.2018.12.002
72.
LeimbachM.BauerN. (2022). Capital markets and the costs of climate policies. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 24(3), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-021-00327-5
73.
LiW.LiuT.WeiM. (2023). Heterogeneous response of the stock market to CO2 emissions in China. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, Article 1074262. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.1074262
74.
LiX.OzturkI.MajeedM. T.HafeezM.UllahS. (2022). Considering the asymmetric effect of financial deepening on environmental quality in BRICS economies: Policy options for the green economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 331, Article 129909. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.129909
75.
LiangC.UmarM.MaF.HuynhT. L. D. (2022). Climate policy uncertainty and world renewable energy index volatility forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, Article 121810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121810
76.
LiesenA.FiggeF.HoepnerA.PattenD. M. (2017). Climate change and asset prices: Are corporate carbon disclosure and performance priced appropriately?Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 44(1-2), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/JBFA.12217
77.
LinB.SuT. (2020). Mapping the oil price-stock market nexus researches: A scientometric review. International Review of Economics & Finance, 67, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.01.007
78.
LiuB.FanY.XueB.WangT.ChaoQ. (2022). Feature extraction and classification of climate change risks: A bibliometric analysis. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194(7), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10661-022-10074-Z/FIGURES/6
79.
LiuZ.SunH.TangS. (2021). Assessing the impacts of climate change to financial stability: Evidence from China. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 13(3), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2020-0108
80.
LuoL.LanY. C.TangQ. (2012). Corporate Incentives to Disclose Carbon Information: Evidence from the CDP Global 500 Report. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 23(2), 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-646X.2012.01055.X
81.
LvW.LiB. (2023). Climate policy uncertainty and stock market volatility: Evidence from different sectors. Finance Research Letters, 51, Article 103506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103506
82.
MajiS. G.KalitaN. (2022). Climate change financial disclosure and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Indian energy sector based on TCFD recommendations. Society and Business Review, 17(4), 594–612. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-10-2021-0208
83.
MarianiM.PizzutiloF.CaragnanoA.ZitoM. (2021). Does it pay to be environmentally responsible? Investigating the effect on the weighted average cost of capital. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(6), 1854–1869. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2164
84.
Martín-MartínA.Orduna-MaleaE.ThelwallM.Delgado López-CózarE. (2018). Google scholar, Web of science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informatics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2018.09.002
MillischerL.EvdokimovaT.FernandezO. (2023). The carrot and the stock: In search of stock-market incentives for decarbonization. Energy Economics, 120, Article 106615. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2023.106615
MonasteroloI.de AngelisL. (2020). Blind to carbon risk? An analysis of stock market reaction to the Paris agreement. Ecological Economics, 170, Article 106571. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2019.106571
89.
MuchiriM. K.Erdei-GallyS.Fekete-FarkasM.LaknerZ. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of green finance and climate change in post-paris agreement era. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(12), Article 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/JRFM15120561
90.
NamK. (2021). Investigating the effect of climate uncertainty on global commodity markets. Energy Economics, 96, Article 105123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105123
91.
NohJ. H.ParkH. (2023). Greenhouse gas emissions and stock market volatility: An empirical analysis of OECD countries. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 15(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2021-0124
92.
OgunrindeO.ShittuE.DhandaK. K. (2022). Distilling the interplay between corporate environmental management, financial, and emissions performance: Evidence from U.S. Firms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(6), 3407–3435. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3040158
93.
PanC.SunT.MirzaN.HuangY. (2022). The pricing of low emission transitions: Evidence from stock returns of natural resource firms in the GCC. Resources Policy, 79, Article 102986. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2022.102986
94.
ParamatiS. R.MoD.GuptaR. (2017). The effects of stock market growth and renewable energy use on CO2 emissions: Evidence from G20 countries. Energy Economics, 66, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2017.06.025
95.
PaulJ.BarariM. (2022). Meta-analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—what, why, when, where, and how?Psychology and Marketing, 39(6), 1099–1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/MAR.21657
96.
PaulJ.BenitoG. R. G. (2018). A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: What do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading?Asia Pacific Business Review, 24(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2017.1357316
97.
PhamL. (2021). Frequency connectedness and cross-quantile dependence between green bond and green equity markets. Energy Economics, 98, Article 105257. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2021.105257
98.
PhamL.HaoW.TruongH.TrinhH. H. (2023). The impact of climate policy on U.S. Environmentally friendly firms: A firm-level examination of stock return, volatility, volume, and connectedness. Energy Economics, 119, Article 106564. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2023.106564
99.
PietersR.BaumgartnerH. (2002). Who talks to whom? Intra- and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161348
100.
Piñeiro-ChousaJ.López-CabarcosM. Á.Ribeiro-SorianoD. (2020). Does investor attention influence water companies’ stock returns?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158(3), Article 120115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120115
101.
QianW.SuryaniA. W.XingK. (2020). Does carbon performance matter to market returns during climate policy changes? Evidence from Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, Article 121040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121040
102.
RahmanS. U.FaisalF.AliA. (2022). Financial development and shadow economy: A bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database (1985–2021). Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(3), 2238–2265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00980-5
103.
ReboredoJ. C. (2018). Green bond and financial markets: Co-Movement, diversification and price spillover effects. Energy Economics, 74, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2018.05.030
104.
ReboredoJ. C.UgoliniA. (2022). Climate transition risk, profitability and stock prices. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, Article 102271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102271
105.
ReidE. M.ToffelM. W. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), 1157–1178. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.796
106.
RubtsovA.XuW.ŠevićA.ŠevićŽ. (2021). Price of climate risk hedging under uncertainty. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165(1), Article 120430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120430
107.
SabéM.SulstarovaA.ChenC.HydeJ.PouletE.AlemanA.DownarJ.BrandtV.MalletL.SentissiO.NitscheM. A.BiksonM.BrunoniA. R.SamueleC.SolmiM. (2023). A century of research on neuromodulation interventions: A scientometric analysis of trends and knowledge maps. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 152, Article 105300. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2023.105300
108.
SantiC. (2023). Investor climate sentiment and financial markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 86, Article 102490. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IRFA.2023.102490
109.
SecinaroS.BresciaV.CalandraD.SaitiB. (2020). Impact of climate change mitigation policies on corporate financial performance: Evidence-based on European publicly listed firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2491–2501. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1971
110.
ShaikhI. (2022). On the relationship between policy uncertainty and sustainable investing. Journal of Modelling in Management, 17(4), 1504–1523. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-12-2020-0320
111.
ShinH.PerdueR. R. (2019). Self-service technology research: A bibliometric co-citation visualization analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 80, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHM.2019.01.012
112.
SinghaniaM.GuptaS.ChadhaG.BrauneE.DanaL. P.IdowuS. O. (2023). Mapping 26 years of climate change research in finance and accounting: A systematic scientometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30(35), 83153–83179. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-023-27828-Y
113.
SobollA.KlierT.HeumannS. (2012). The prospective impact of climate change on tourism and regional economic development: A simulation study for Bavaria. Tourism Economics, 18(1), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2012.0103
114.
StremerschS.VerniersI.VerhoefP. C. (2007). The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1509/JMKG.71.3.171
115.
SunY.ZouY.JiangJ.YangY. (2023). Climate change risks and financial performance of the electric power sector: Evidence from listed companies in China. Climate Risk Management, 39, Article 100474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2022.100474
116.
SweilehW. M. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed literature on climate change and human health with an emphasis on infectious diseases. Globalization and Health, 16, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12992-020-00576-1/TABLES/8
117.
ThistlethwaiteJ. (2015). The politics of experimentation in climate change risk reporting: The emergence of the climate disclosure standards board (CDSB). Environmental Politics, 24(6), 970–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1051325
118.
TsiotsouR. H.KolesB.PaulJ.LoureiroS. M. C. (2022). Theory generation from literature reviews: A methodological guidance. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(5), 1505–1516. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJCS.12861
119.
UrhanB.HoştutS.Güdekliİ. A.AydoğanH. (2023). Climate change and marketing: A bibliometric analysis of research from 1992 to 2022. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30(34), 81550–81572. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-023-26071-9
120.
VermaS.GustafssonA. (2020). Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach. Journal of Business Research, 118, 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2020.06.057
121.
WangH.-t.QiS.-z.LiK. (2023). Impact of risk-taking on enterprise value under extreme temperature: From the perspectives of external and internal governance. Journal of Asian Economics, 84, Article 101556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2022.101556
122.
WasimR. (2019). Corporate (non)disclosure of climate change information. Law Review, 119, 1311–1354. https://doi.org/10.2307/26650740
123.
WinschelJ. (2021). Climate change policies and carbon-related CEO compensation systems: An exploratory study of European companies. Journal of Global Responsibility, 12(2), 158–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-06-2020-0065
124.
XuD.SherazM.HassanA.SinhaA.UllahS. (2022). Financial development, renewable energy and CO2 emission in G7 countries: New evidence from non-linear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Economics, 109, Article 105994. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2022.105994
125.
XuX.HuangS.LuceyB. M.AnH. (2023). The impacts of climate policy uncertainty on stock markets: Comparison between China and the US. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88, Article 102671. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IRFA.2023.102671
126.
YadavA.ChakrabortyA. (2023). Relationship between investor sentiment and stock returns: A bibliometric analysis using SCOPUS database. Global Business and Economics Review, 28(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/GBER.2023.10046444
YeN.KuehT. B.HouL.LiuY.YuH. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of corporate social responsibility in sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, Article 122679. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.122679
129.
YinX.XuZ. (2022). An empirical analysis of the coupling and coordinative development of China’s green finance and economic growth. Resources Policy, 75, Article 102476. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2021.102476
130.
YuJ.ZhangL.PengL.WuR. (2023). Which component of air quality index drives stock price volatility in China: A decomposition-based forecasting method. Finance Research Letters, 51, Article 103406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103406
131.
ZemigalaM. (2019). Tendencies in research on sustainable development in management sciences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 796–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.009
132.
ZengJ.QuJ.MaH.GouX. (2021). Characteristics and trends of household carbon emissions research from 1993 to 2019: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, Article 126468. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.126468
133.
ZerbibO. D. (2019). The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 98, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBANKFIN.2018.10.012
134.
ZhangK.LiangQ. M. (2020). Recent progress of cooperation on climate mitigation: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, Article 123495. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.123495
135.
ZhangS. Y. (2022). Are investors sensitive to climate-related transition and physical risks? Evidence from global stock markets. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, Article 101710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101710
136.
ZhangY.NiuH.YuQ. (2021). Impacts of climate change and increasing carbon dioxide levels on yield changes of major crops in suitable planting areas in China by the 2050s. Ecological Indicators, 125, Article 107588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107588
137.
ZhaoH.ZhangF.KwonJ. (2018). Corporate social responsibility research in international business journals: An author co-citation analysis. International Business Review, 27(2), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.09.006
138.
ZhouX. Y.CaldecottB.HoepnerA. G. F.WangY. (2022). Bank green lending and credit risk: An empirical analysis of China’s green credit policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1623–1640. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2973
139.
ZhuJ.HuaW. (2017). Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 110(2), 893–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-016-2187-8
140.
ZhuJ.LiuW. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8
141.
ZieglerA.BuschT.HoffmannV. H. (2011). Disclosed corporate responses to climate change and stock performance: An international empirical analysis. Energy Economics, 33(6), 1283–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.03.007
