A Sustainable Development Assessment for the Load Capacity Factor and Carbon Footprint in India: The Role of Information and Communication Technologies,Renewable Energy,and Structural Changes

Abstract

The increase in India’s carbon emissions and the decline in its environmental quality are a threat to the realization of the global sustainable development goals (SDGs). Minimizing the negative environmental impacts from fossil fuels through analysis of the determinants of India’s ecological quality is an important research topic. The objective of this study is to examine the impact of information and communication technologies (ICT), renewable energy, and structural changes on environmental quality in India. In this context, the study uses the novel Fourier quantile causality test for the period 1995m1-2021m12. The results of the study show that structural changes have no impact on carbon footprint and load capacity factor, while renewable energy and ICT contribute to the improvement of environmental quality. Based on the findings of the study, the Indian government is recommended to rise investment in ICT and renewable energy to pursue a growth strategy in line with the SDGs.

Keywords

internet usage structural change sustainable development renewable energy technological progress

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdulmagid Basheer Agila

Khalifa

W. M.

Saint Akadiri

Adebayo

T. S.

Altuntaş

(2022). Determinants of load capacity factor in South Korea: Does structural change matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(46), 69932–69948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20676-2

Adebayo

T. S.

Oladipupo

S. D.

Rjoub

Kirikkaleli

Adeshola

(2022). Asymmetric effect of structural change and renewable energy consumption on carbon emissions: Designing an SDG framework for Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02065-w

Adebayo

T. S.

Ullah

Kartal

M. T.

Ali

Pata

U. K.

Ağa

(2023). Endorsing sustainable development in BRICS: The role of technological innovation, renewable energy consumption, and natural resources in limiting carbon emission. The Science of the Total Environment, 859(Pt 1), 160181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160181

Adedoyin

F. F.

Agboola

P. O.

Ozturk

Bekun

F. V.

Agboola

M. O.

(2021). Environmental consequences of economic complexities in the EU amidst a booming tourism industry: Accounting for the role of brexit and other crisis events. Journal of Cleaner Production, 305, 127117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127117.

Ahmed

Ahmad

Rjoub

Kalugina

O. A.

Hussain

(2022). Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 30(4), 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2251

Alola

A. A.

Bekun

F. V.

Sarkodie

S. A.

(2019). Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. The Science of the Total Environment, 685, 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139.

Avom

Nkengfack

Fotio

H. K.

Totouom

(2020). ICT and environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Effects and transmission channels. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 120028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120028.

Balsalobre-Lorente

Contente dos Santos Parente

Leitão

N. C.

Cantos-Cantos

J. M.

(2023). The influence of economic complexity processes and renewable energy on CO2 emissions of BRICS. What about industry 4.0? Resources Policy, 82, 103547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103547.

Bekun

(2022). Mitigating emissions in India: Accounting for the role of real income, renewable energy consumption and investment in energy. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(1), 188–192. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.12652

10.

Bekun

F. V.

Gyamfi

B. A.

Onifade

S. T.

Agboola

M. O.

(2021). Beyond the environmental Kuznets Curve in E7 economies: Accounting for the combined impacts of institutional quality and renewables. Journal of Cleaner Production, 314, 127924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127924.

11.

Ben Lahouel

Taleb

Managi

Guesmi

(2022). The threshold effects of ICT on CO₂ emissions: Evidence from the MENA countries. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-022-00346-w.

12.

Bibi

Khan

M. K.

Tufail

M. M. B.

Godil

D. I.

Usman

Faizan

(2023). How ICT and globalization interact with the environment: A case of the Chinese economy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30(3), 8207–8225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22677-7

13.

Chang

Taghizadeh-Hesary

Saydaliev

H. B.

(2022). How do ICT and renewable energy impact sustainable development? Renewable Energy, 199, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.082.

14.

Charfeddine

Umlai

(2023). ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 184, 113482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113482.

15.

Cheng

Hsueh

H. P.

Ranjbar

Wang

M. C.

Chang

(2021). Urbanization, coal consumption and CO₂ emissions nexus in China using bootstrap Fourier Granger causality test in quantiles. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 14(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-020-00263-0

16.

Dickey

D. A.

Fuller

W. A.

(1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517

17.

Dogan

Pata

U. K.

(2022). The role of ICT, R&D spending and renewable energy consumption on environmental quality: Testing the LCC hypothesis for G7 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 135038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135038.

18.

Ehigiamusoe

K. U.

Lean

H. H.

Somasundram

(2022). Unveiling the non-linear impact of sectoral output on environmental pollution in Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(5), 7465–7488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16114-4

19.

Evans

Mesagan

E. P.

(2022). ICT-trade and pollution in Africa: Do governance and regulation matter? Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(3), 511–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.06.003

20.

Fareed

Pata

U. K.

(2022). Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption and income in top ten renewable energy-consuming countries: Advanced Fourier based panel data approaches. Renewable Energy, 194, 805–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.156.

21.

Fareed

Salem

Adebayo

T. S.

Pata

U. K.

Shahzad

(2021). Role of export diversification and renewable energy on the load capacity factor in Indonesia: A fourier quantile causality approach. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 770152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.770152.

22.

Gallant

A. R.

(1981). On the bias in flexible functional forms and an essentially unbiased form: The Fourier flexible form. Journal of Econometrics, 15(2), 211–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(81)90115-9

23.

Global Footprint

Network.

(2023). National footprint accounts. Route de Jeunes 91227 Geneva (Acacias) Switzerland. https://data.footprintnetwork.org/?_ga=2.98286495.1411283141.1692138589-179964658.1689705468#/ (accessed 20 July 2023).

24.

Granger

C. W.

(1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791

25.

Grossman

G. M.

Krueger

A. B.

(1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Working paper No: 3914. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914.

26.

Guloglu

Emre Caglar

Korkut Pata

(2023). Analyzing the determinants of the load capacity factor in OECD countries: Evidence from advanced quantile panel data methods. Gondwana Research, 118, 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.02.013.

27.

Hasanov

F. J.

Mukhtarov

Suleymanov

(2023). The role of renewable energy and total factor productivity in reducing CO2 emissions in Azerbaijan. Fresh insights from a new theoretical framework coupled with Autometrics. Energy Strategy Reviews, 47, 101079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101079.

28.

Huan

Hassan

M. S.

Tahir

M. N.

Mahmood

Al-Darwesh

H. R. I.

(2022). The role of energy use in testing N–shaped relation between industrial development and environmental quality for Chinese economy. Energy Strategy Reviews, 43, 100905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100905.

29.

Ibrahim

R. L.

Ajide

K. B.

Usman

Kousar

(2022). Heterogeneous effects of renewable energy and structural change on environmental pollution in Africa: Do natural resources and environmental technologies reduce pressure on the environment? Renewable Energy, 200, 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.134.

30.

IEA . (2022). India’s clean energy transition is rapidly underway, benefiting the entire World. International Energy Agency 9 rue de la Fédération 75739 Paris Cedex. https://www.iea.org/commentaries/india-s-clean-energy-transition-is-rapidly-underway-benefiting-the-entire-world (accessed 11 August 2023).

31.

Islam

M. S.

Rahaman

S. H.

(2023). The asymmetric effect of ICT on CO2 emissions in the context of an EKC framework in GCC countries: the role of energy consumption, energy intensity, trade, and financial development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(31), 77729–77741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27590-1.

32.

Jahanger

Zaman

Hossain

M. R.

Awan

(2023). Articulating CO₂ emissions limiting roles of nuclear energy and ICT under the EKC hypothesis: An application of non-parametric MMQR approach. Geoscience Frontiers, 14(5), 101589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101589

33.

Jin

Ahmed

Pata

U. K.

Kartal

M. T.

Erdogan

(2023). Do investments in green energy, energy efficiency, and nuclear energy R&D improve the load capacity factor? An augmented ARDL approach. Geoscience Frontiers, 101646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101646.

34.

Kartal

M. T.

Samour

Adebayo

T. S.

Kılıç Depren

(2023). Do nuclear energy and renewable energy surge environmental quality in the United States? New insights from novel bootstrap Fourier Granger causality in quantiles approach. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 155, 104509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104509.

35.

Khan

Oubaih

Elgourrami

F. Z.

(2022). The effect of renewable energy sources on carbon dioxide emissions: Evaluating the role of governance, and ICT in Morocco. Renewable Energy, 190, 752–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.140.

36.

Wang

(2022). Does renewable energy reduce ecological footprint at the expense of economic growth? An empirical analysis of 120 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 346, 131207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131207.

37.

Lin

Wambersie

Wachernagel

(2021). Estimating the date of Earth overshoot day 2021. Global Footprint Network, Switzerland. https://www.overshootday.org/content/uploads/2021/07/Earth-Overshoot-Day-2021-Nowcast-Report.pdf (accessed 10 August 2023).

38.

Malmodin

Lundén

(2018). The energy and carbon footprint of the global ICT and E&M sectors 2010–2015. Sustainability, 10(9), 3027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093027

39.

Nazlioglu

Gormus

N. A.

Soytas

(2016). Oil prices and real estate investment trusts (REITs): Gradual-shift causality and volatility transmission analysis. Energy Economics, 60, 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.09.009.

40.

Yang

Razzaq

(2022). How do natural resources, digitalization, and institutional governance contribute to ecological sustainability through load capacity factors in highly resource-consuming economies? Resources Policy, 79, 103068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103068.

41.

Omri

Saidi

(2022). Factors influencing CO₂ emissions in the MENA countries: The roles of renewable and non-renewable energy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(37), 55890–55901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19727-5

42.

Our World in

Data.

(2023). Per capita energy consumption from renewables, 2022. Global Change Data Lab. https://ourworldindata.org/ (accessed 13 June 2023).

43.

Pata

U. K.

(2018). The effect of urbanization and industrialization on carbon emissions in Turkey: Evidence from ARDL bounds testing procedure. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(8), 7740–7747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1088-6

44.

Pata

U. K.

(2021a). Do renewable energy and health expenditures improve load capacity factor in the USA and Japan? A new approach to environmental issues. The European Journal of Health Economics, 22(9), 1427–1439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01321-0

45.

Pata

U. K.

(2021b). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO 2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: Testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(1), 846–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10446-3

46.

Pata

U. K.

Caglar

A. E.

Kartal

M. T.

Kılıç Depren

(2023). Evaluation of the role of clean energy technologies, human capital, urbanization, and income on the environmental quality in the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production, 402, 136802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136802.

47.

Pata

U. K.

Dam

M. M.

Kaya

(2023). How effective are renewable energy, tourism, trade openness, and foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions? An EKC analysis for ASEAN countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30(6), 14821–14837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23160-z

48.

Pata

U. K.

Samour

(2023). Assessing the role of the insurance market and renewable energy in the load capacity factor of OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30(16), 48604–48616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25747-6

49.

Quito

del Río-Rama

M. D. L. C.

Álvarez-García

Durán-Sánchez

(2023). Impacts of industrialization, renewable energy and urbanization on the global ecological footprint: A quantile regression approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1529–1541. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3203

50.

Rees

W. E.

(1992). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, 4(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789200400212

51.

Sharif

Kartal

M. T.

Bekun

F. V.

Pata

U. K.

Foon

C. L.

Kılıç Depren

(2023). Role of green technology, environmental taxes, and green energy towards sustainable environment: Insights from sovereign nordic countries by CS-ARDL approach. Gondwana Research, 117, 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.01.009.

52.

Sharma

Sinha

Kautish

(2021). Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124867.

53.

Siche

Pereira

Agostinho

Ortega

(2010). Convergence of ecological footprint and emergy analysis as a sustainability indicator of countries: Peru as case study. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 15(10), 3182–3192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.10.027.

54.

Statista . (2023). Investment in clean energy globally in 2019, by select country. Statista Inc. Germany. https://www.statista.com/statistics/799098/global-clean-energy-investment-by-country/ (accessed 10 August 2023).

55.

Sun

Usman

Radulescu

Pata

U. K.

Balsalobre-Lorente

(2023). New insights from the STIPART model on how environmental-related technologies, natural resources and the use of the renewable energy influence load capacity factor. Gondwana Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.05.018.

56.

Taghvaee

V. M.

Nodehi

Saboori

(2022). Economic complexity and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: Sector-wise environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(53), 80860–80870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21491-5

57.

Toda

H. Y.

Yamamoto

(1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1–2), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8

58.

Wang

Sun

Korkut Pata

(2023). Linking trade openness to load capacity factor: The threshold effects of natural resource rent and corruption control. Gondwana Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.05.016

59.

World Bank (2023). World development indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators (accessed 20 July 2023).

60.

Zhang

Pan

(2019). Impact of affluence and fossil energy on China carbon emissions using STIRPAT model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(18), 18814–18824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04950-4

61.

Zheng

Ahmed

Xie

Majeed

M. T.

Hafeez

(2023). Green growth and carbon neutrality targets in China: Do financial integration and ICT matter? Journal of Cleaner Production, 405, 136923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136923.

62.

Zivot

Andrews

D. W. K.

(1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1992.10509904

63.

Zulfiqar

Tahir

S. H.

Ullah

M. R.

Ghafoor

(2023). Digitalized world and carbon footprints: Does digitalization really matter for sustainable environment? Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30(38), 88789–88802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28332-z