Globally, several governments have adopted various forms of green stimulus policies (GSP) to manage environmental challenges and revitalize their national economies during crises. However, research on the varieties of GSPs within a country and the possible drivers of this diversity remain scarce. This study qualitatively compares the green growth and green new deal policies adopted under two different administrations in South Korea. Although both GSPs share similar components, they vary in their focus on nuclear energy and international cooperation. This study postulates that these differences are associated with the degree to which each administration saw GSP through the lens of a developmental state. Besides providing a comparative tool for examining GSPs and their elements, this research contributes to GSP research in a non-Western developed-country setting by highlighting how domestic factors shape the nature and composition of GSPs.
AgrawalaS.DussauxD..MontiN. (2020). What policies for greening the crisis response and economic recovery? Lessons learned from past green stimulus measures and implications for the COVID-19 crisis. OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 164. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c50f186f-en
2.
BarbierE. B. (2010a). A global green new deal: Rethinking the economic recovery. Cambridge University Press.
ChuY. W. (2016). The Asian developmental state: Ideas and debates. In: The Asian developmental state (pp. 1–25). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137476128_1
DentC. (2019). East Asia’s new developmentalism: State capacity, climate change and low-carbon development. In SinghJ.OvadiaJ. (Eds), Developmental states beyond East Asia. New York: Routledge.
9.
DentC. M. (2018). East Asia’s new developmentalism: State capacity, climate change and low-carbon development. Third World Quarterly, 39(6), 1191–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1388740
EckersleyR. (2021). Greening states and societies: From transitions to great transformations. Environmental Politics, 30(1–2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1810890
12.
ElkerboutM.EgenhoferC.Núñez FerrerJ.CatutiM.KustovaI.RizosV. (2020). The European green deal after Corona: Implications for EU climate policy. CEPS Policy Insights, pp. 1–12.
13.
European Commission (2019). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European economic and social Committee and the Committee of the regions “the European green deal” COM (640, pp. 11–12).
14.
FiorinoD. J. (2017). Green economy: Reframing ecology, economics, and equity. In MeadowcroftJ.FiorinoD. J. (Eds), Conceptual innovation in environmental policy (pp. 281–306). Cambridge: Massachusetts: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262036580.003.0012
GosensJ.JotzoF. (2020). China’s post-COVID-19 stimulus: No green new deal in sight. Environmental Innovation and Societal. Transitions, 36, 250–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.07.004.
GundersonR.YunS. J. (2017). South Korean green growth and the Jevons paradox: An assessment with democratic and degrowth policy recommendations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.006.
20.
HaY-H.ByrneJ. (2019). The rise and fall of green growth: Korea’s energy sector experiment and its lessons for sustainable energy policy. Energy and Environment, 8(4), Article e335. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.335
21.
HanH. (2015a). Korea's pursuit of low-carbon green growth: A middle-power state's dream of becoming a green pioneer. The Pacific Review, 28(5), 731–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2015.1013491
22.
HanH. (2015b). Authoritarian environmentalism under democracy: Korea’s river restoration project. Environmental Politics, 24(5), 810–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1051324
23.
HanH. (2019). Energy transition and the roles of local government: Renewable energy policy under the Moon administration. Asia Pacific Journal of Business, 10(1), 87–103. (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.32599/apjb.10.1.201903.87
24.
HongS. (2011). Where is the nuclear nation going? Hopes and fears over nuclear energy in South Korea after the Fukushima disaster. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 5(3), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-1415901
KalinowskiT. (2021). The politics of climate change in a neo-developmental state: The case of South Korea. International Political Science Review, 42(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120924741
LadislawS.GoldbergerN. (2010). Assessing the global green stimulus. Center for strategic and international studies.
32.
LeeJ. H.WooJ. (2020). Green new deal policy of South Korea: Policy innovation for a sustainability transition. Sustainability, 12(23), 10191. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310191
33.
LeeS. J.HanT. (2006). The demise of “Korea, Inc.”: Paradigm shift in Korea's developmental state. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 36(3), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330680000191
34.
LeeT. (2021). From nuclear energy developmental state to energy transition in South Korea: The role of the political epistemic community. Environmental Policy & Governance, 31(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1919
35.
LeeT.KimM.ChifambaN. (2021). Political framework of green new deal: A comparative analysis of the EU and US proposals. The Korean Journal of International Studies, 19(2), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2021.08.19.2.221
36.
LeeT.RyuS.KimM. (2022). Public deliberation on nuclear power plant construction: The impact of values, processes, and personal attributes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 131794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131794.
37.
LimE. (2021). A comparative study of power mixes for green growth: How South Korea and Japan see nuclear energy differently. Energies, 14(18), 5681. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185681
38.
LoiseauE.SaikkuL.AntikainenR.DrosteN.HansjürgensB.PitkänenK.LeskinenM.KuikmanP.ThomsenM. (2016). Green economy and related concepts: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.024.
Merino-SaumA.ClementJ.WyssR.BaldiM. G. (2020). Unpacking the green economy concept: A quantitative analysis of 140 definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118339.
41.
MinnsJ. (2001). Of miracles and models: The rise and decline of the developmental state in South Korea. Third World Quarterly, 22(6), 1025–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590120099777
NamA.WeibleC. M.ParkK. (2022). Polarization and frames of advocacy coalitions in South Korea's nuclear energy policy. Review of Policy Research, 39(4), 387–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12466
44.
NewellP.MulvaneyD. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12008
45.
O’DonnellJ. K. (2013). Nuclear power in South Korea’s green growth strategy: Green growth Quarterly update III-2013. Council on Foreign Relations.
SonnenscheinJ.MundacaL. (2015). Decarbonization under green growth strategies? The case of South Korea. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.060.
48.
TienhaaraK. (2014). Varieties of green capitalism: Economy and environment in the wake of the global financial crisis. Environmental Politics, 23(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.821828
