Tanzanian Environmental Impact Assessment Laws and Practice for Projects in World Heritage Sites

Abstract

Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is an integral component of sound decision-making. Environmental impact assessment helps to prevent or reduce environmental harms by informing the decision-makers the likely environmental impacts of intended project, its alternatives and/or mitigation measures before the implementation starts. This study examines the effectiveness of Tanzania EIA laws and related practice on the protection of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the world heritage sites during implementation of development projects. The study used data obtained from government officials, policies, laws and reports; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and World Heritage Committee reports; and scholarly works. The study demonstrates that Tanzania EIA laws are inadequate to ensure effective protection of OUV of world heritage sites against harms caused by development projects. The laws do not guarantee effective and broader participation of stakeholders and inclusion of heritage impact assessment in EIA study. The study, therefore, recommends for reform of EIA laws and institutions responsible for supervising EIA.

Keywords

environmental impact assessment world heritage sites laws in practice effectiveness Tanzania

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

African Union Commission . (2015). Agenda 2063: The Africa we want (Popular version). African Union Commission. https://au.int/sites/default/files/documents/36204-doc-agenda2063_popular_version_en.pdf.

Bellini

(2008). Ngorongoro: Broken promises – what price our heritage? https://pubs.iied.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/migrate/12546IIED.pdf?

Cuppen

Broekhans

Enserink

(2012). Public participation in EIA and attitude formation. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.660348.

Daily News Reporter (2020). Tanzania: Govt upbeat on nyerere hydropower project completion. Daily News. https://dailynews.co.tz/news/2020-04-065e8b3acb59aa7.aspx.

Dei

G. J. S.

(1993). Sustainable development in the African context: Revisiting some theoretical and methodological issues. Africa Development, XVIII(2), 97–110.

Duinker

P. N.

Greig

L. A.

(2007). Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: Improving explorations of the future. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(3), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.11.001

Dye

Hartmann

(2019). The true cost of power: The facts and risks of buildng Stiegler’s Gorge hydropower dam in selous game reserve, Tanzania. WWF. https://c402277.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/publications/1078/files/original/ESIA_Classification_Memo_for_Disclosure_-_GEF_Nepal_LD_2013.pdf?1499097238

EACJ (2014). African Network for Animal Welfare (ANAW) v The Attorney General of the United Republic of Tanzania, Unreported). EACJ. https://www.eacj.org/?cases=the-attorney-general-of-the-united-republic-of-tanzania-vs-african-network-for-animal-welfare.

Environmental Investigation Agency (2021). World heritage dammed: The need to uphold the integrity of the world heritage convention in the case of Tanzania’s reckless selous-rufiji hydropower project. Environmental Investigation Agency. https://eia-international.org/wp-content/uploads/2021-EIA-Report-World-Heritage-Dammed-Single-pages.pdf

10.

General Assembly of the World Heritage Convention (2015). Policy for the integration of a sustainable development perspective into the processes of the world heritage convention. World Heritage Committee.

11.

Guilanpour

Sheate

W. R.

(1997). A systematic review of tanzanian environmental impact statements. Project Appraisal, 12(3), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688867.1997.9727053

12.

Hoag

H. J.

Öhman

M.-B.

(2008). Turning water into power: Debates over the development of Tanzania’s Rufiji River Basin, 1945–1985. Technology and Culture, 49(3), 624–651. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.0.0061

13.

ICOMOS (2009). World heritage in danger: A compendium of key decisions on the conservation of cultural heritage properties on the unesco list of world heritage in danger (compendium II). ICOMOS. https://whc.unesco.org/document/106357

14.

ICOMOS (2011). Guidance on heritage impact assessments for cultural world heritage properties: A publication of the international Council on monuments and sites. ICOMOS and World Heritage Centre. https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/2018-07/icomos_guidance_on_heritage_impact_assessments_for_cultural_world_heritage_properties.pdf

15.

IUCN (2013). World heritage advice note: Environmental assessment. IUCN. https://www.iucn.org/sites/dev/files/import/downloads/iucn_advice_note_environmental_assessment_18_11_13_iucn_template.pdf

16.

IUCN (2017). IUCN conservation outlook assessment 2017: Selous game reserve. IUCN. https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/node/994/pdf/en?year=2017

17.

IUCN (2019a). Technical review of the environmental impact assessment for the Rufiji hydropower project in selous game reserve. IUCN. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2019-015-En.pdf

18.

IUCN (2019b). Independent technical review of the “strategic environmental assessment for the proposed Rufiji hydropower project” in selous game reserve world heritage site, Tanzania. IUCN. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2019-044-En.pdf

19.

Lamtey

(2018). Tanzania to ‘fast-track EIA certificates’: Makamba says. The citizen. https://www.thecitizen.co.tz/news/Govt-to--fast-track-EIA-certificates-/1840340-4652162-11mahdk/index.html

20.

Leelakrishnan

(1992). Environmental impact assessment: Legal dimensions. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 34(4), 541–562.

21.

Momtaz

(2002). Environmental impact assessment in Bangladesh: A critical review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00106-8

22.

Morgan

R. K.

(2012). Environmental impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557

23.

Mwalyosi

Hughes

(1998). The performance of EIA in Tanzania: An assessment (IRA research paper No. 41 an IIED environmental planning issued No 14). Institute of Resource Assessment and International Institute for Environmental and Development. https://pubs.iied.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/migrate/7781IIED.pdf

24.

Mwalyosi

Hughes

Howlett

(1999). Introduction course on environmental impact assessment in Tanzania: Resource handbook. International Institute for Environment and Development and Institute for Resource Assessment. https://pubs.iied.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/migrate/7791IIED.pdf

25.

Mwalyosi

R. B. B.

Mohamed

Hughes

Dalal-Clayton

(1995). Environmental assessment in Tanzania: A needs assessment for training. [IRA Research Paper No. 36]. IRA & IIED. https://pubs.iied.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/migrate/7756IIED.pdf

26.

Mwenda

(2020). Tanzania to build Stiegler’s Gorge dam in a wildlife reserve and UNESCO site. Lifegate. https://www.lifegate.com/stieglers-gorge-dam-tanzania

27.

National Environment Commission (2011). Environmental management tools and techniques:a learning material. National Environment Commission.

28.

Nyihirani

Katima

Mbululo

(2014). Performance of environmental impact assessment (EIA) regime in Tanzania. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 7(1), 754–764. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v7i1.6s

29.

Ortolano

Shepherd

(1995). Environmental impact assessment: Challenges and opportunities. Impact Assessment, 13(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1995.9726076

30.

Røskaft

Fyumagwa

Gereta

Keyyu

Ntalwila

Nyahongo

Hassan

Bevanger

Graae

Lein

Skj

(2012). The dynamics of large infrastructure development in conservation of the Serengeti ecosystem – the case study of a road through Serengeti national park(p. 22). Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute. https://rmgsc.cr.usgs.gov/outgoing/Powell/Migration/TAWIRI-IPBES_Report_first-phase2011.pdf

31.

Sosovele

(2011). Governance challenges in Tanzania’s environmental impact assessment practice. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 5(2), 126–130.

32.

The Attorney General of the United Republic of Tanzania v African Network for Animal Welfare (ANAW) (2015). Appeal No. 3 OF 2014. EACJ, July 29 https://www.eacj.org/?cases=the-attorney-general-of-the-united-republic-of-tanzania-vs-african-network-for-animal-welfare

33.

Trail Smelter Case (United States, Canada) (1938). III Reports of International Arbitral Awards 1905 (16 April 1938 and 11 March 1941). Office of Legal Affairs: United Nations. Retrieved January 30, 2022, from https://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_III/1905-1982.pdf.

34.

UN (1993). Report of the united Nations conference on environment and development (Vol. 1). United Nations. https://undocs.org/en/A/CONF.151/26/Rev.1(vol.I)

35.

UN (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf

36.

UNEP (2008). Desalination Resource and guidance manual for environmental impact assessments. United Nations Environment Programme, Regional Office for West Asia, & World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean.

37.

UNESCO (2012). Managing natural World Heritage: World Heritage resource manual. UNESCO. http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity-703-1.pdf.

38.

UNESCO (2018). UNESCO reiterates its grave concern over planned dam construction within selous game reserve world heritage property (United Republic of Tanzania). UNESCO. https://whc.unesco.org/en/news/1920#:∼:text=The%20Committee%20also%20recalled%20its,impacts%20of%20the%20Stiegler's%20Gorge

39.

UNESCO (2019). UNESCO concerned about insufficient strategic environmental assessment of the Rufiji hydropower project in selous game reserve (Tanzania). UNESCO. https://whc.unesco.org/en/news/2071

40.

UNESCO (n.d.). Serengeti national park. Unesco. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/156

41.

URT (1995). The Tanzania development vision 2025. http://www.tzonline.org/pdf/thetanzaniadevelopmentvision.pdf

42.

URT (1997). National environmental policy. Vice President’s Office. https://www.nemc.or.tz/uploads/publications/sw-1576228807-NEP%201997.pdf

43.

URT, Ministry of Energy and Minerals (2019). Rufiji hydropower project: The untold story of the socio-economic benefits of the project in transforming lives to generations of Tanzanians. http://www.maelezo.go.tz/storage/app/uploads/public/5d3/d91/a72/5d3d91a72b973281392133.pdf

44.

URT, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism (2001). Guidelines & procedures for undertaking environmental impact assessment in marine parks and reserves in Tanzania.

45.

URT, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism (2019). A report on state of conservation of selous game reserve world heritage property (N199).

46.

Warnock

(2013). World heritage sites and sustainable development: Case of the western ghats. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 55(3), 327–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3263873

47.

Waterpower (2019). Independent report says Rufiji environmental assessment is ‘inadequate’. Waterpower. https://www.waterpowermagazine.com/news/newsindependent-reports-says-rufiji-environmental-assessment-is-inadequate-7563907

48.

World Heritage Committee (2010). Decisions adopted by the world heritage committee at its 34th session. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2010/whc10-34com-20e.pdf

49.

World Heritage Committee (2011). Decisions adopted by the world heritage committee at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011). World Health Committee. https://whc.unesco.org/archive/2011/whc11-35com-20e.pdf

50.

World Heritage Committee (2017). Decisions adopted during the 41st session of the world heritage committee, forty-first session, 2 – 12 July 2017. https://whc.unesco.org/archive/2017/whc17-41com-18-en.pdf

51.

World Heritage Committee (2019). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. https://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide12-en.pdf

52.

WWF (2018). Tanzania and the world heritage sites. WWF. https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?326433/Tanzania-and-the-World-Heritage-Sites.