Participation of citizens in local energy decisions is increasingly recognized as helpful for a successful decentralized energy transition. In this article, we focus on energy cooperatives in which private individuals jointly develop facilities to generate energy from renewable sources, thus involving citizens both politically and economically. Focusing on Switzerland and Germany, we show that there is a strong linkage between such cooperatives and municipalities, characterized by collaboration and support, and that the cooperatives are well suited as collaborating partners. We also show that federalist structures are most suited for such local arrangements as municipalities must have leeway to support cooperatives in a targeted manner and to compensate for shortcomings in the energy policy of superordinate governmental levels. Based on these results, we suggest that local governments should be given sufficient financial capacities and autonomy to strengthen implementation of a decentralized energy transition that involves citizens. However, we also recognize that municipal structures alone are often insufficient and that superordinate policies, especially national subsidies, remain essential. Hence, policies at the municipal and national levels should take greater account of citizen initiatives, such as energy cooperatives, which exhibit various noncommodifiable advantages relevant to the energy transition.
AvelinoF.BosmanR.FrantzeskakiN.AkerboomS.BoontjeP.HoffmanJ., … WittmayerJ. (2014). The (self-)governance of community energy: Challenges & prospects (DRIFT practice brief no. PB 2014.01).
Rotterdam, the Netherlands:
Dutch Research Institute for Transitions.
2.
BauwensT.Devine-WrightP. (2018).
Positive energies? An empirical study of community energy participation and attitudes to renewable energy.Energy Policy,
118, 612–625.
3.
BauwensT.GotchevB.HolstenkampL. (2016).
What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives.Energy Research and Social Science,
13, 136–147.
4.
BerkaA. L.CreamerE. (2018).
Taking stock of the local impacts of community owned renewable energy: A review and research agenda.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
82, 3400–3419.
5.
BoschS.PeykeG. (2011).
Gegenwind für die Erneuerbaren – Räumliche Neuorientierung der Wind-, Solar- und Bioenergie vor dem Hintergrund einer verringerten Akzeptanz sowie zunehmender Flächennutzungskonflikte im ländlichen Raum [Oppositing against renewables. Spatial reorientation of wind, solar and bioenergy against the background of reduced acceptance and increasing land use conflicts in rural areas]. Raumforschung und Raumordnung,
69, 105–118.
6.
BulkeleyH.KernK. (2006).
Local government and the governing of climate change in Germany and the UK.Urban Studies,
43(12), 2237–2259.
7.
CallaghanG.WilliamsD. (2014).
Teddy bears and tigers. How renewable energy can revitalise local communities.Local Economy,
29(6–7), 657–674.
8.
CreamerE.EadsonW.van VeelenB.PinkerA.TingeyM.Braunholtz-SpeightT. … Lacey BarnacleM. (2018).
Community energy: Entanglements of community, state, and private sector.Geography Compass,
12(7), 1–16.
9.
DeborS. (2018). Multiplying mighty Davids? The influence of energy cooperatives on Germany’s energy transition.
Cham, Switzerland:
Springer International.
10.
DerthickM. (2010). Compensatory federalism. In RabeB. G. (Ed.), Greenhouse governance: Addressing climate change in America (pp. 58–72).
Washington, DC:
Brookings Institution Press.
Deutscher Genossenschafts-und Raiffeisenverband. (2017). Energiegenossenschaften: Ergebnisse der DGRV Jahresumfrage [Energy cooperatives: Results of the DGRV annual survey]. Retrieved from https://www.genossenschaften.de/zahlen-und-fakten
13.
DóciG.GotchevB. (2016).
When energy policy meets community. Rethinking risk perceptions of renewable energy in Germany and the Netherlands.Energy Research & Social Science,
22, 26–35.
14.
Ebers BroughelA.HamplN. (2018).
Community financing of renewable energy projects in Austria and Switzerland: Profiles of potential investors.Energy Policy,
123, 722–736.
15.
EhnertF.KernF.BorgströmS.GorissenL.MaschmeyerS.EgermannM. (2018).
Urban sustainability transitions in a context of multi-level governance: A comparison of four European states.Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions,
26, 101–116.
FormanA. (2017).
Energy justice at the end of the wire: Enacting community energy and equity in Wales.Energy Policy,
107, 649–657.
19.
FrantzeskakiN.AvelinoF.LoorbachD. (2013). Outliers or frontrunners? Exploring the (self-) governance of community-owned sustainable energy in Scotland and the Netherlands. In MichalenaE.HillsJ. (Eds.), Renewable energy governance. Understanding the complexities and challenges of RE implementation (pp. 101–116),
Berlin, Germany:
Springer.
20.
FuchsD.GrafA. (2017). Lokale Innovationsimpulse im europäischen Mehr-Ebenen-System [Local innovation stimuli in the European multi-level system]. In FuchsG. (Ed.), Lokale Impulse für Energieinnovationen (pp. 145–160).
Wiesbaden, Germany:
Springer.
21.
GeitmannR. (2002). Beschnittene Anwendungsbereiche für Bürgerbegehren und –entscheid [Limited scope for citizens' petitions and referendums]. In SchillerT.MittendorfV. (Eds.), Direkte Demokratie (pp. 166–178).
Wiesbaden, Germany:
Westdeutscher Verlag.
22.
GrafS.DirnbergerF.GaßA. (2013). Gemeinden in der Energiewende. Örtliche Energiepolitik – Vertreter örtlicher Interessen – Energieverbraucher – Energiewirtschaftliche Beratung [Municipalities in the Energy Turnaround. Local Energy Policy -- Representatives of Local Interests -- Energy Consumers -- Energy Economic Consulting].
Wiesbaden, Germany:
Kommunal- und Schulbuchverlag.
23.
GugerliD. (1994). Allmächtige Zauberin unserer Zeit -- Zur Geschichte der elektrischen Energie in der Schweiz [Almighty sorceress of our time -- The history of electrical energy in Switzerland].
Zurich, Switzerland:
Chronos Verlag.
24.
HealeyP. (2015).
Citizen-generated local development initiative. Recent English experience.International Journal of Urban Sciences,
19(2), 109–118.
25.
HoppeT.GrafA.WarbroekB.LammersI.LeppingI. (2015).
Local governments supporting local energy initiatives. Lessons from the best practices of Saerbeck (Germany) and Lochem (the Netherlands).Sustainability,
7(2), 1900–1931.
26.
HufenJ. A. M.KoppenjanJ. F. M. (2015).
Local renewable energy cooperatives. Revolution in disguise?Energy, Sustainability and Society,
5(1), 161.
KlaggeB.MeisterT. (2018).
Energy cooperatives in Germany—An example of successful alternative economies?Local Environment,
41(1), 1–20.
29.
KooijH.-J.OtemanM.VeenmanS.SperlingK.MagnussonD.PalmJ.HvelplundF. (2018).
Between grassroots and treetops: Community power and institutional dependence in the renewable energy sector in Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands.Energy Research and Social Science,
37, 52–64.
LadnerA.KeufferN.BaldersheimH. (2016).
Measuring local autonomy in 39 countries (1990–2014).Regional & Federal Studies,
26(3), 321–357.
32.
LinderW. (2007).
Die deutsche Föderalismusreform – von außen betrachtet. Ein Vergleich von Systemproblemen des deutschen und des schweizerischen Föderalismus [The reform of German federalism -- an external view. A Comparison of Systemic Problems of German and Swiss Federalism].Politische Vierteljahresschrift,
48(1), 3–16.
33.
MarkantoniM. (2016).
Low carbon governance: Mobilizing community energy through top-down support?Environmental Policy and Governance,
26(3), 155–169.
34.
MeisterT.SchmidB.SeidlI.KlaggeB. (under review). How municipalities support energy cooperatives: Survey results from Germany and Switzerland.
35.
MignonI.RüdingerA. (2016).
The impact of systemic factors on the deployment of cooperative projects within renewable electricity production—An international comparison.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
65, 478–488.
36.
NoldenC. (2013).
Governing community energy—Feed-in tariffs and the development of community wind energy schemes in the United Kingdom and Germany.Energy Policy,
63, 543–552.
37.
ReynoldsB. J. (2000).
The one member-one vote rule in cooperatives.Journal of Cooperatives,
15, 47–62.
RodiM. (2016).
Kommunale Energiepolitik in liberalisierten Energiemärkten [Municipal energy policy in liberalized energy markets].EWeRK,
3, 177–181.
40.
SagerF. (2014). Infrastrukturpolitik: Verkehr, Energie und Telekommunikation [Infrastructure policy: transport, energy and telecommunications]. In KnoepfelP.PapadopoulosY.SciariniP.VatterA.HäusermannS. (Eds.), Handbuch der Schweizer Politik. Manuel de la politique Suisse (pp. 721–748).
Zurich, Switzerland:
Verlag Neue Zürcher Zeitung.
41.
SagerF.BürkiM.LuginbühlJ. (2014).
Can a policy program influence policy change? The case of the Swiss EnergieSchweiz program.Energy Policy,
74, 352–365.
42.
SalmS.HilleS. L.WüstenhagenR. (2016).
What are retail investors’ risk-return preferences towards renewable energy projects? A choice experiment in Germany. Energy policy,
97, 310–320.
43.
SchmidB.SeidlI. (2018). Zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement und Rahmenbedingungen für erneuerbare Energie in der Schweiz [Civil society engagement and framework conditions for renewable energies in Switzerland]. In HolstenkampL.RadtkeJ. (Eds.), Handbuch Energiewende und Partizipation (pp. 1093–1106).
Wiesbaden, Germany:
Springer VS.
44.
SchreursM. A. (2008).
From the bottom up.The Journal of Environment & Development,
17(4), 343–355.
45.
SchwalbL.WalkH. (2007). Blackbox governance—Lokales engagement im Aufwind [Blackbox governance--Local engagement on the rise]. In SchwalbL.WalkH. (Eds.), Local governance - mehr Transparenz und Bürgernähe? (pp. 7–22).
Wiesbaden, Germany:
VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
46.
SerlavosM. (2018). Les citoyens deviennent acteurs de la transition énergétique - l’exemple de l’énergie citoyenne en Suisse romande [Citizens becoming actors in the energy transition--the example of citizen energy in French-speaking Switzerland]. In NiwaN.FrundB. (Eds.), Volteface. La transition énergétique: un projet de société (pp. 91--109).
Lausanne, Paris:
Editions d’en bas; Editions Charles Léopold Mayer.
van VeelenB. (2018).
Negotiating energy democracy in practice: Governance processes in community energy projects.Environmental Politics,
27(4), 644–665.
49.
VatterA. (2018). Das politische System der Schweiz.
Baden-Baden, Germany:
Nomos Verlag.
50.
WalkerG.Devine-WrightP. (2008).
Community renewable energy. What should it mean?Energy Policy,
36(2), 497–500.
51.
WarbroekB.HoppeT. (2017).
Modes of governing and policy of local and regional governments supporting local low-carbon energy initiatives; Exploring the cases of the Dutch regions of Overijssel and Fryslân.Sustainability,
9(1), 75.
52.
WarrenC. R.McFadyenM. (2010).
Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland.Land Use Policy,
27(2), 204–213.
53.
WohlfahrtstätterC.BoutellierR. (2010).
Wie liberalisiert ist der Schweizer Strommarkt wirklich? [How liberalized is the Swiss electricity market in actual fact] Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen,
60(8), 58–59.
