Triggering Community Conservation Through the Trade of Carbon Offsets: The Case of the Ejido Felipe Carrillo Puerto,Mexico

Abstract

Based on qualitative research and a case study analysis, this article describes how a local conservation initiative grounded on the potential to trade carbon offsets in the voluntary market has triggered a multipurpose scheme for community conservation in the ejido of Felipe Carrillo Puerto, Mexico. We describe how the Felipe Carrillo Puerto has engaged in the creation of two community-conserved areas, an ecotourism venture, and two projects of payment for environmental services. We show how creating a portfolio of conservation projects has allowed the ejido to diversify their sources of income in addition to creating an important number of jobs related to conservation. We discuss the implications of the community experiences with different conservation schemes, the market-based instruments that can trigger community conservation, and the importance of giving local communities the opportunity to define their own conservation paths.

Keywords

community conservation market-based instruments carbon sequestration payment for ecosystem services Mexico

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adriansen

H. K.

(2012) Timeline interviews: A tool for conducting life history research. Qualitative Studies 3(1): 40–55.

Agarwal

(2001) Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development 29(10): 1623–1648. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00066-3.

Arsel

Büscher

(2012) Nature™ Inc.: Changes and continuities in neoliberal conservation and market-based environmental policy. Development and Change 43(1): 53–78. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01752.x.

Barkin

(1987) The end to food self-sufficiency in Mexico. Latin American Perspectives 14(3): 271–297.

Bray

D. B.

Duran

Anta

Martin

Mondragon

(2008) A new conservation and development frontier: Community protected areas in Oaxaca, Mexico. Current Conservation 2(2): 7–9.

Bray

D. B.

Ellis

E. A.

Armijo-Canto

Beck

C. T.

(2004) The institutional drivers of sustainable landscapes: A case study of the “Mayan Zone” in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Land Use Policy 21(4): 333–346. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.11.001.

Brenner

(2010) Gobernanza ambiental, actores sociales y conflictos en las Áreas Naturales Protegidas mexicanas [Environmental governance, social actors and conflicts in Mexican natural protected areas]. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 2(55): 283–310.

Chapin, M. (2004, November/December). A challenge to conservationists. World Watch, 17(6), 17–31.

Charchalac Santay, S. (2012). Experiencias en compensació n por servicios ambientales en América Latina (PSA o REDD+): Descripció n de casos relevantes [Experiences in compensation for environmental services in Latin America (PSA or REDD +): Description of relevant cases] (p. 60). Washington DC: Forest Trends Association.

10.

Christensen, J. (2004) Win-win illusions. Over the past two decades, efforts to heal the rift between poor people and protected areas have foundered. So what next? Conservation in Practice, 5(1), 12–19.

11.

Corbera

(2011) Mexico’s PES-carbon programme: A preliminary assessment and impacts on rural livelihoods. In: Tacconi

Mahanty

Suich

(eds) Payments for environmental services, forest conservation and climate change: Livelihoods in the REDD?, Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar, pp. 54–81.

12.

Corbera

Soberanis

C. G.

Brown

(2009) Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services: An analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry programme. Ecological Economics 68(3): 743–761. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008.

13.

Denscombe

(2010) The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects, 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, pp. 373.

14.

Ejido de Felipe Carrillo Puerto. (2009). El proyecto Much Kanan K’aax “Juntos cuidemos la selva.” The project Much Kanan K'aax “Together we take care of the forest”. Felipe Carrillo Puerto, Quintana Roo: U'yo'olché.

15.

Elbroch

Mwampamba

T. H.

Santos

M. J.

Zylberberg

Liebenberg

Minye

Reddy

(2011) The value, limitations, and challenges of employing local experts in conservation research. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 25(6): 1195–1202. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01740.x.

16.

Ellis

E. A.

Porter-Bolland

(2008) Is community-based forest management more effective than protected areas? Forest Ecology and Management 256(11): 1971–1983. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.07.036.

17.

Faust

B. B.

(2001) Maya environmental successes and failures in the Yucatan Peninsula. Environmental Science & Policy 4(4–5): 153–169. doi:10.1016/S1462-9011(01)00026-0.

18.

Ferraro

P. J.

Kiss

(2002) Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 298(5599): 1718–1719. doi:10.1126/science.1078104.

19.

García-Frapolli

Ramos-Fernández

Galicia

Serrano

(2009) The complex reality of biodiversity conservation through Natural Protected Area Policy: Three cases from the Yucatan peninsula, Mexico. Land Use Policy 26(3): 715–722. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.09.008.

20.

Global Environment Facility-Small Grants Programme (2012) Community-based carbon accounting: A pilot project on how communities can engage in REDD+, New York, NY: United Nations Development Program (UNDP).

21.

Haenn

(1999) The power of environmental knowledge: Ethnoecology and environmental conflicts in Mexican conservation. Human Ecology 27(3): 477–491.

22.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2011). Perspectiva estadística Quintana Roo 2011. Aguascalientes: Author.

23.

Ingram

J. C.

(2012) Introduction to innovative financing: The role of payments for ecosystem services in poverty reduction bundling. In: Carter Ingram

DeClerck

Rumbaitis del Rio

(eds) Integrating ecology and poverty reduction. The application of ecology in development solutions, New York, NY: Springer.

24.

Kinzig

A. P.

Perrings

Chapin

F. S.

III Polasky

Smith

V. K.

Tilman

Turner

B. L.

II (2011) Paying for ecosystem services—Promise and peril. Science 334: 603–604. December.

25.

Luzar

E. J.

Diagne

(1999) Participation in the next generation of agriculture conservation programs: The role of environmental attitudes. The Journal of Socio-Economics 28(3): 335–349. doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(99)00021-9.

26.

Martin

Campo

Camacho

Sauceda

G. E.

Juan

X. Z.

(2010) Negotiating the web of law and policy: Community designation of indigenous and community conserved areas in Mexico. Policy Matters 17: 195–204.

27.

Mcafee

Shapiro

E. N.

(2010) Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: Nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the state. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100(3): 579–599.

28.

Montagnini

Finney

(2011) Payments for environmental services in Latin America as a tool for restoration and rural development. Ambio 40(3): 285–297. doi:10.1007/s13280-010-0114-4.

29.

Muradian

(2013) Payments for ecosystem services as incentives for collective action. Society & Natural Resources 26(10): 1155–1169.

30.

Muradian

Rival

(2012) Between markets and hierarchies: The challenge of governing ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 1(1): 93–100. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.009.

31.

Narloch

Drucker

A. G.

Pascual

(2011) Payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services for sustained on-farm utilization of plant and animal genetic resources. Ecological Economics 70(11): 1837–1845. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.018.

32.

Newing

(2011) Conducting research in conservation: Social sciences methods and practice, New York, NY: Routledge.

33.

Pathak, N., Bhatt, S., Balasinorwala, T., Kothari, A., & Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (2004). Community conserved areas: A bold frontier for conservation. Tehran: TILCEPA/IUCN, CENESTA, CMWG and WAMIP.

34.

Porter-Bolland, L., Ruiz-Mallén, I., Camacho-Benavides, C., & McCandless, S.R. (Eds.). (2013). Community Action for Conservation. Mexican Experiences. New York: Springer.

35.

Reyes-Garcia

Ruiz-Mallen

Porter-Bolland

Garcia-Frapolli

Ellis

Mendez

M.-E.

Sanchez-Gonzalez

M.-C.

(2013) Local understandings of conservation in southeastern Mexico and their implications for community-based conservation as an alternative paradigm. Conservation Biology 27(4): 856–865. doi:10.1111/cobi.12056.

36.

Rico García-Amado

Ruiz Pérez

Barrasa García

(2013) Motivation for conservation: Assessing integrated conservation and development projects and payments for environmental services in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico. Ecological Economics 89: 92–100. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.002.

37.

Rico García-Amado

Ruiz Pérez

Reyes Escutia

Barrasa García

Contreras Mejía

(2011) Efficiency of payments for environmental services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a biosphere reserve in Chiapas, Mexico. Ecological Economics 70(12): 2361–2368. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.016.

38.

Robson

J. P.

(2007) Local approaches to biodiversity conservation: Lessons from Oaxaca, Southern Mexico. International Journal of Sustainable Development 10(3): 267–286.

39.

Roth

R. J.

Dressler

(2012) Market-oriented conservation governance: The particularities of place. Geoforum 43(3): 363–366. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.01.006.

40.

Schelhas

Pfeffer

M. J.

(2009) When global environmentalism meets local livelihoods: Policy and management lessons. Conservation Letters 2(6): 278–285.

41.

Simonian

(1995) Defending the land of the jaguar: A history of conservation in Mexico, 1st ed. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 326.

42.

Taylor

P. L.

Zabin

(2000) Neoliberal reform and sustainable forest management in Quintana Roo, Mexico: Rethinking the institutional framework of the forestry pilot plan. Agriculture and Human Values 17: 141–156.

43.

Taylor, S. J. & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. Madrid, España: Espasa Libros.

44.

TEEB. (2011). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in national and international policy making. London: Earthscan.

45.

Tellez

(1993) Nueva legislación de tierras, bosques y aguas [New legislation on land, forest and water], Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

46.

U’yo’olché. (2005). Estudio de ordenamiento territorial del ejido de Felipe Carrillo Puerto, Quintana Roo. [Study of land use zoning of the ejido Felipe Carrillo Puerto, Quintana Roo]. Felipe Carillo Puerto, Quintana Roo: U'yo'oché.

47.

United Nations Environment Programme. (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. Geneva: United Nations Environmental Program.

48.

Wendland

K. J.

Honzák

Portela

Vitale

Rubinoff

Randrianarisoa

(2010) Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: Opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar. Ecological Economics 69(11): 2093–2107. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.01.002.

49.

Wunder, S. (2006). Pagos por servicios ambientales: Principios básicos esenciales [Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts]. CIFOR Occasional Paper 42. Jakarta: CIFOR.

50.

Wunder

Wertz-Kanounnikoff

(2009) Payments for ecosystem services: A new way of conserving biodiversity in forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3–5): 576–596. doi:10.1080/10549810902905669.