There is currently limited knowledge about the effects of introducing genetically modified (GM) crops into smallholder farming or about how biosafety requirements are interpreted and adopted by smallholders. A case study was conducted on introduction of GM (Bt) maize to South African smallholders. The results reveal low general awareness about agricultural technology among smallholders and an incompatibility between smallholder practices and biosafety requirements. The implications are low understanding of biosafety measures and low compliance. Therefore, essential prerequisites for the safe introduction of GM crops to smallholders are increased smallholder knowledge on modern plant varieties and improved agricultural advisory services that better match the smallholder context. In addition, information about GM crops and biosafety implementation must be modified to better suit smallholders.
AltieriM. A.RossetP. (1999). Ten reasons why biotechnology will not ensure food security, protect the environment and reduce poverty in the developing world. AgBioForum, 2, 155-162.
2.
AltieriM. A.Funes-MonzoteF. R.PetersenP. (2011). Agroecologically efficient agricultural systems for smallholder farmers: Contributions to food sovereignty. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32, 1-13.
3.
AssefaY.Van den BergJ. (2009). Genetically modified maize: Adoption practices of small-scale farmers in South Africa and implications for resource poor farmers on the continent. Aspects of Applied Biology, 96, 215-223.
4.
BembridgeT. J. (1991). Technology transfer in small-scale dryland crop production: Future challenges. Development Southern Africa, 8, 479-493.
5.
BennettR.ButheleziT. J.IsmaelY.MorseS. (2003). Bt cotton, pesticides, labour and health: A case study of smallholder farmers in the Makhathini flats, Republic of South Africa. Outlook on Agriculture, 32, 123-128.
6.
BennettR.IsmaelY.MorseS.ShankarB. (2004). Reductions in insecticide use from adoption of Bt cotton in South Africa: Impacts on economic performance and toxic load to the environment. Journal of Agricultural Science, 142, 665-674.
7.
BorlaugN. E. (2000). Ending world hunger. The promise of biotechnology and the threat of antiscience zealotry. Plant Physiology, 124, 487-490.
8.
ByerleeD.HeiseyP. W. (1996). Past and potential impacts of maize research in sub-Saharan Africa: A critical assessment. Food Policy, 21, 255-277.
CollierD. (2012). Regulatory frameworks governing seed supply and access: Implications for traditional and small-scale farmers in South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: University of Cape Town.
11.
CollierD.MoituiC. (2009). Africa’s regulatory approach to biotechnology in agriculture: An opportunity to seize socio-economic concerns. African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 17, 29-56.
12.
DawsonJ.C.MurphyK.M.JonesS.S. (2008). Decentralized selection and participatory approaches in plant breeding for low-input systems. Euphytica, 160, 143-154.
13.
De WetC. (1990). The socio-ecological impact of development schemes in the “homelands” of South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 86, 440-447.
14.
FitzgeraldD. (1993). Farmers deskilled: Hybrid corn and farmers’ work. Technology and Culture, 34, 324-343.
15.
GlennaL.L.JussaumeR.A.DawsonJ.C. (2011). How farmers matter in shaping agricultural technologies: Social and structural characteristics of wheat growers and wheat varieties. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 213-224.
16.
GouseM.PiesseJ.ThirtleC.PoultonC. (2009). Assessing the performance of GM maize amongst smallholders in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. AgBioForum, 12, 78-89.
17.
GouseM.PrayC. E.KirstenJ.SchimmelpfennigD. (2005). A GM subsistence crop in Africa: The case of Bt white maize in South Africa. International Journal of Biotechnology, 7, 84-94.
18.
HebinckP.FayD.KondloK. (2011). Land and agrarian reform in South Africa’s Eastern Cape province: Caught by continuities. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11, 220-240.
19.
KfirR.OverholtW. A.KhanZ. R.PolaszekA. (2002). Biology and management of economically important lepidopteran cereal stem borers in Africa. Annual Review of Entomology, 47, 701-731.
20.
KrugerM.Van RensburgJ. B. J.Van den BergJ. (2009). Perspective on the development of stem borer resistance to Bt maize and refuge compliance at the Vaalharts irrigation scheme in South Africa. Crop Protection, 28, 684-689.
21.
KrugerM.Van RensburgJ. B. J.Van den BergJ. (2011). Resistance to Bt maize in Busseola fusca (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Vaalharts, South Africa. Environmental Entomology, 40, 477-483.
22.
KrugerM.Van RensburgJ. B. J.Van den BergJ. (2012). Transgenic Bt maize: Farmers’ perceptions, refuge compliance and reports of stem borer resistance in South Africa. Journal of Applied Entomology, 136, 38-50.
23.
LouetteD.SmaleM. (2000). Farmers’ seed selection practices and traditional maize varieties in Cuzalapa, Mexico. Euphytica, 113, 25-41.
24.
McCannJ.C.DaltonT. J.MekuriaM. (2006). Breeding for Africa’s new smallholder maize paradigm. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 4, 99-107.
25.
MercerK. L.PeralesH. R.WainwrightJ. D. (2012). Climate change and the transgenic adaptation strategy: Smallholder livelihoods, climate justice, and maize landraces in Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 22, 495-504.
26.
MorrisM.BellonM. (2004). Participatory plant breeding research: Opportunities and challenges for the international crop improvement system. Euphytica, 136, 21-35.
27.
PemslD.WaibelH.GutierrezA. P. (2005). Why do some Bt-cotton farmers in China continue to use high levels of pesticides?International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 3, 44-56.
28.
RussellA. W. (2008). GMOs and their contexts: A comparison of potential and actual performance of GM crops in a local agricultural setting. Geoforum, 39, 213-222.
29.
SchnurrM. A. (2012). Inventing Makhathini: Creating a prototype for the dissemination of genetically modified crops into Africa. Geoforum, 43, 784-792.
30.
ScoonesI. (2002). Can Agricultural Biotechnology be Pro-Poor? A Sceptical Look at the Emerging “Consensus”IDS Bulletin, 33, 114-119.
31.
SmaleM.JayneT. (2003). Maize in Eastern and Southern Africa: “Seeds” of Success in Retrospect. EPTD Discussion papers. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
32.
SnappS. S.BlackieM. J.DonovanC. (2003). Realigning research and extension to focus on farmers’ constraints and opportunities. Food Policy, 28, 349-363.
StoneG. D. (2004). Biotechnology and the Political Ecology of Information in India. Human Organization, 63, 127-140.
35.
StoneG. D. (2007). Agricultural deskilling and the spread of genetically modified cotton in Warangal. Current Anthropology, 48, 67-103.
36.
ThomsonJ. A. (2008). The role of biotechnology for agricultural sustainability in Africa. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 905-913.
37.
TrippR. (2001). Can biotechnology reach the poor? The adequacy of information and seed delivery. Food Policy, 26, 249-264.
38.
Van RensburgJ. B. J. (2007). First report of field resistance by the stem borer, Busseola fusca (Fuller) to Bt-transgenic maize. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 24, 147-151.
39.
Van RensburgJ. B. J.Van RensburgG. D. J.GiliomeeJ. H.WaltersM. C. (1987). The influence of rainfall on the seasonal abundance and flight activity of the maize stalk borer, Busseola fusca in South Africa. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 4, 183-187.
40.
WaddingtonS. R.MudharaM.HlatshwayoM.KunjekuP. (1991). Extent and causes of low yield in maize planted late by smallholder farmers in sub-humid areas of Zimbabwe. Farming Systems Bulletin, Eastern and Southern Africa, 9, 15-31.
41.
WambuguF. (1999). Why Africa needs agricultural biotech. Nature, 400, 15-16.
