From June 20 to 22, 2012, 45,000 participants from governments, the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, and major groups met in Rio De Janeiro for the “Rio+20” United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. The outcome document titled “The Future We Want” alludes to a grand vision for addressing global challenges in the framework of sustainable development: economic, social, and environmental. But the 53-page long document only reiterates promises made elsewhere. It fails to lay out a coherent roadmap forward, much less to define binding targets with specific deadlines. The declaration, however, does reflect a changing political reality in international negotiations. Developing countries are playing a much more assertive role in pushing poverty eradication as the overarching priority than at any time before. Rio+20 furthermore presents a snapshot of the divers interests and voices that shape the discourse on sustainable development, 20 years after the original 1992 Rio Conference launched the debate.
BeineckeF. G.NoppenT. V. (2012, June22) We have met the solution and it is us. New York Times, Op-ed.
3.
Brundtland Report/World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. New York, NY. Oxford University Press.
4.
ChandhokeN. (2002). The limits of global civil society. In GlasiusM.KaldorM.AnheierH. (Eds.), Global civil society 2002 (pp. 35-54). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
ChatterjeeP.FingerM. (1994). The earth brokers. New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
ClémençonR. (2006). What future for the global environment facility. Journal of Environment and Development, 14(1), 53-74.
7.
ClémençonR. (2009). Innovative Financing Mechanisms for the GEF. First Meeting for the Fifth Replenishment of the GEF Trust Fund, March 17-18, 2009, Paris. GEF/R.5/8, February27, 2009
8.
ClémençonR. (2012, March). From Rio 1992 to Rio 2012 and beyond: Revisiting the role of trade rules and financial transfers for sustainable development. Journal of Environment & Development, 21, 5-14.
9.
ClineW. (1992). The economics of global warming. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
10.
DriesenD. M., ed. (2010). Economic Thought and U.S. Climate Change Policy. Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.
11.
DyerG. (2010). Climate Wars. The Fight for Survival as the World Overheats. New York: Oneworld Publications.
12.
Fukuda-ParrS.HulmeD. (2011). “International norm dynamics and the “End of poverty”: Understanding the millennium development goals. Global Governance17, 17-36.
13.
HaasP. M.LevyM. A.ParsonE. A. (1992, October). Appraising the Earth Summit: How should we judge UNCED’s success?Environment, 34, 8.
14.
HaleT. N.MauzerallD. L. (2004, September). Thinking globally and acting locally: Can the Johannesburg partnerships coordinate action on sustainable development?Journal of Environment & Development, 13, 220-239.
International Institute for Sustainable Development. (2012, June25). Earth Negotiations Bulletin: Daily coverage from June 13 to June 22, final summary. Retrieved from http://www.iisd.ca/uncsd/rio20/enb/
17.
JacksonJ. H. (2008). The case of the world trade organization. International Affairs, 84, 437-454.
18.
JinnahS. (2011). Strategic Linkages: The Evolving Role of Trade Agreements in Global Environmental Governance. The Journal of Environment & Development, 20, 191-215.
19.
JohnsonS.KwakJ. (2011). 13 Bankers. The Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financing Meltdown. New York: Vintage Books, Random House.
20.
Journal of Environment and Development. (2012, March). Special 20th Anniversary Issue of JED: From Rio 1992 to Rio 2012 and Beyond: Taking Stock and Moving Forward in the Search for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from http://jed.sagepub.com/content/21/1.toc
21.
Journal of Environment and Development. (2012, June). Policy Instruments for Sustainable Development at Rio +20, Guest edited by DamonMariaSternerThomas. Retrieved from http://jed.sagepub.com/content/21/2.toc
22.
LomborgB. (2001). The skeptical environmentalist: Measuring the state of the world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
OreskesN.ConwayE. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt. How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
24.
PearceD. W.WarfordJ. J. (1993). World without end. Economics, environment, and sustainable development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
RedcliffM. (Ed.). (2000). Sustainability. Life chances and livelihoods. London, UK: Routledge.
27.
ReimannK. (2006). A view from the top: International politics, norms and the worldwide growth of NGOs. International Studies Quarterly, 50, 45-67.
28.
Progress on the Sidelines (2012, June23). Progress on the sidelines as Rio Conference ends. New York Times.
29.
Rio+20 Earth Summit. (2012a, June20). Rio+20 Earth summit: Pressure for deal - Will leaders hold their nerve?The Guardian.
30.
RobinsonJ. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48, 369-384.
31.
SeghezzoL. (2009). The five dimensions of sustainability. Environmental Politics, 18, 539-556.
32.
SmithS. (1994). Environment on the Periphery of International Relations: An Explanation. In ThomasC. (Ed.), Rio—Unravelling the Consequences (pp. 28-45.). Portland, OR: Frank Cass.
33.
StiglitzJ. (2006). Making globalization work. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
34.
ToussaintE.MilletD. (2010). Debt, The IMF and the World Bank. Sixty questions, sixty answers. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
