This study identifies the determinants of households’ willingness to pay for an improvement in solid waste-collection services based on 381 households in Kampala. Employing the double-bounded contingent valuation method, households’ mean willingness to pay for improved solid waste collection service was estimated to be USh 2,439 per month. Both the decision to pay and the amount households are willing to pay for improved solid waste collection services are influenced by income, education, age, and home ownership. A socially acceptable fee which the majority of people are willing to pay should be set to avoid the free-rider problem.
AlberiniA. (1995). Efficiency vs bias of willingness-to-pay estimates: Bivariate and interval-data models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 169-180.
AltafM. A.DeshazoJ. R. (1996). Household demand for improved solid waste management: A case study of Gujranwala, Pakistan. World Development, 24, 857-868.
4.
ArrowK.SolowR.PortneyP.LeamerE.RadnerR.SchumanH. (1993). Contingent Valuation Methodology Report, report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58, 4602-4614.
5.
BangaM. (2008). The economics of solid waste management, the case of Kampala City, Uganda (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Dar-es-Salaam, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.
6.
BasiliM.MatteoM. D.FerriniS. (2006). Analysing demand for environmental quality: A Willingness to Pay/Accept Study in the province of Siena (Italy). Waste Management, 26, 209-219.
7.
CaliaP.StrazzeraE. (2000). Bias and Efficiency of Single Vs Double-Bound Models for Contingent Valuation Stusies: A Monte Carlo Analysis. Applied Economics, 32(10), 1329-1336.
8.
CameronT. A. (1988). A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: Maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15, 355-379.
9.
CameronT. A.JamesM. D. (1987). Efficient estimation methods for closed-ended Contingent Valuation Survey data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 269-276.
10.
CameronT.A.QuigginJ. (1994). Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice with Follow-up Questionnaire. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(3), 218-234.
11.
CarsonR. T. (2000). Contingent valuation: A user’s guide. Environmental Science and Technology, 34, 1413-1418.
12.
ChienY.HuangC. J.ShawD. (2005). A general model of starting point bias in double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50, 362-377.
13.
Cointreau-LevineS.CoadA.GopalanP. (2000).Guidance pack: Private sector participation in municipal solid waste management. St Gallen: Swiss Centre for Development Cooperation in Technology and Management.
14.
CummingsR. G.TaylorL. O. (1999). Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. American Economic Review, 89, 649-665.
15.
FontaW. M.IchokuH. E. (2005). The application of contingent valuation method to community-led financing schemes: Evidence from rural Cameroon. Journal of Developing Areas, 39(1), 109-126.
16.
FontaW. M.IchokuH. E.OgujiubaK. K.ChukwuO. J. (2008). Using a contingent valuation approach for improved solid waste management facility: Evidence from Enugu State, Nigeria. Journal of African Economies, 17, 277-304.
17.
FujitaY.FujiiA.FurukawaS.OgawaT. (2005). Estimation of willingness-to pay (WTP) for water and sanitation services through contingent valuation method (CVM)—A case study in Iquitos City, The Republic of Peru. Retrieved from http://www.jbic.go.jp/en/research/report/jbic-review/pdf/report10_2.pdf
18.
HanemannW. M. (1984). Welfare evaluation in contingent evaluation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66, 332-341.
19.
JinJ.WangZ.RanS. (2006). Comparison of contingent valuation and choice experiment in solid waste management programs in Macao. Ecological Economics, 57, 430-441.
20.
KriströmB. (1997). Spike models in contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 1013-1023.
21.
KasoziJ. (2008). Garbage Power. Article in the Sunday Vision Newspaper. SundayVision, 24February, 2008.
22.
ListJ.A. (2001). Do Explict Warnings Eliminate the Hypothetical Bias in Elicitation Procedures? Evidence from Field Auctions for Sports Cards. American Economic Review, 91, 1498-1507.
23.
LouviereJ. J.HensherD. A.SwatJ. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and application. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
24.
LuskJ. (2003). Effects of cheap talk on consumer willingness to pay for golden rice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85, 840-856.
25.
McFaddenD. (1974). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour. In ZarembkaP. (Ed). Frontiers in Econometrics, New York, Academic Press.
26.
MekonnenA. (2000). Valuation of community forestry in Ethiopia: A Contingent Valuation Study of rural households. Environment and Development Economics, 5, 289-308.
27.
MitchellR. C.CarsonR. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
28.
ReiserB.ShechterM. (1999). Incorporating zero values in the economic valuation of environmental program benefits. Environmetrics, 10, 87-101.
29.
StrazzeraE.GeniusM.ScarpaR.HutchinsonG. (2003). The effects of protest votes on the estimates of WTP for use values of recreational sites. Environmental and Resource Economics, 25, 461-476.
30.
StrazzeraE.ScarpaR.CaliaP.GarrodG.WillisK. (2003). Modeling zero values and protest responses in contingent valuation surveys. Applied Economics, 35(2), 133-138.
VellaF. (1992). Simple tests for sample selection bias in censored and discrete choice models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7, 413-421.
33.
VellaF. (1998). Estimating models with sample selection bias: A survey. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 127-169.
34.
WhittingtonD.BriscoeJ.MuX.BarronW. (1990). Estimating the willingness to pay for water services in developing countries: A case study of the use of contingent valuation surveys in Southern Haiti. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 38, 293-311.
35.
ZainK. K. (1999). The right garbage collection service charge estimated through contingent valuation method: The case of Istanbul. Retrieved from http://siti.feem.it/gnee/pap-abs/zaim.pdf
